Extremely Minor Changes Coming to the Chrysler 300, If You Want It

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Brace yourselves and hide the kids. The Chrysler 300, an aging full-size sedan whose best sales days are long behind it, wants to add a little flair to its top-flight 300C model.

No, there won’t be a monster of an engine borrowed from a Satanic-sounding Dodge. There won’t be head-turning paint options. Instead, Fiat Chrysler will endow its glitziest model with something found on the lesser-ranked 300S.

It’s an appearance package. A Performance Appearance Package, to use FCA’s chosen moniker. This truly tiny tidbit comes by way of Mopar Insiders, which noticed a new option poised to land on 300 buyers. (The brand’s consumer website does not currently show it.)

You’ll recall that the 300 is not a model that generates many headlines. Indeed, aside from a flurry of press about the model’s near-certain discontinuation in 2021 (or earlier), media stories are reserved for the two Dodge models built alongside the 300 at FCA’s Brampton, Ont. assembly plant. There wasn’t a single 300 on the car carrier I saw leaving Brampton Assembly last month.

Indeed, it was circumstantial evidence of the model’s declining sales relative to the reasonably healthy demand enjoyed by Dodge’s Challenger and Charger.

What does the Performance Appearance Package bring 300C buyers? Basically, a selection of ingredients from the 300S model’s Sport Appearance Package (seen above) — namely, a “performance” front fascia with revised fog lights and barely-there side sills. The 300S’s package, mimicking the looks of the brawny SRT model sold overseas, retails for $1,795 and includes a blacked-out grille surround and rear lip spoiler. The $695 package offered on the 300C doesn’t get that wild.

If it needed to be said, the powertrain does not receive the 6.4-liter V8 that’s also missing from the unavailable SRT’s 300C doppelganger. American 300 buyers stopped being able to tick an SRT box in 2015.

Chrysler 300 sales peaked with the current, rear-drive iteration’s debut in 2005, consistently falling year over year from 2012 onwards. Last year saw 46,593 300s sold in the U.S., compared to more than 144,000 sold in 2005. Over the first five months of 2019, 300 volume declined 36 percent as the Charger’s popularity rose 4 percent.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 36 comments
  • HotPotato HotPotato on Jun 27, 2019

    This design has aged well, and it's the only thing of its kind left. I hope it's with us a while longer. I still loathe low roofs and gun slit windows in big cars though...this vehicle would be infinitely better with headroom and a greenhouse.

  • SuperCarEnthusiast SuperCarEnthusiast on Jul 01, 2019

    It would have much more sales if FCA kept the same powertrains as when it had peak sales with a V8 hemi with AWD!

  • Thomas Same here....but keep in mind that EVs are already much more efficient than ICE vehicles. They need to catch up in all the other areas you mentioned.
  • Analoggrotto It's great to see TTAC kicking up the best for their #1 corporate sponsor. Keep up the good work guys.
  • John66ny Title about self driving cars, linked podcast about headlight restoration. Some relationship?
  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
Next