QOTD: Your Least Favorite Front-drive Nineties Ride?

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Last week, Steph penned a QOTD where he let commenters loose on front-drive American cars made between 1980 and 2010. The ask was to pick a favorite from the wide selection; one you’d buy today as new.

This week we’re going to take the opposite tack and talk about the front-drive car you like the least.



Today, the game will be more limited in scope. Instead of multiple decades, we’ll focus solely on the 1990s. Any car put forth today should be of a model year between 1990 and 1999. No limitation on country of manufacture — they’re all game. From a decade which produced many fine examples of front-drive cars, picking a loser might take a bit of pondering. For your author, the choice was obvious.

Here we are — the gigantic and terrible Chrysler Imperial of 1990. At the turn of the decade, Chrysler decided it needed a new flagship sedan in its lineup, and thus the Imperial nameplate rose from the ashes once again.

Riding on a super-extended K-car platform known as Y, the Imperial was the largest sedan ever sourced from the K. A full-size 203 inches long, the Imperial came stuffed with Mark Cross leather, digital almost everything, an optional car phone on the sun visor, and a hefty price tag. Chrysler intended to compete with other large, front-drive sedans like the Continental, DeVille, and Park Avenue. All those choices were better than the Imperial. The pontoon boat proportions and floaty suspension matched well with the 1978 levels of exterior gingerbread. A relative flop, the Imperial lasted only through 1993. At that point, it was mercifully replaced by the quite superior LHS.

Let’s hear about your least favorite front-drive Nineties ride.

[Images: Murilee Martin/TTAC, Chrysler ]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 165 comments
  • HotPotato HotPotato on Apr 13, 2019

    The Toyota Tercel was my least favorite car at the time. Incredibly light and fragile bits assembled with incredible care and precision. I did't get it. Seemed to me like sculpting Michelangelo's David out of dog poop. Anything Daewoo. Anything Hyundai, at least in the early 1990s. Any early Quad 4 car. Base Cavalier. But they could redeem themselves in sport trim. I dug the early Z24(6?) with the V6, square-in-a-circle wheels, and Coke-bottle skirts. The later Cavalier Z24 with the 16-valve engine was more adult-looking and reasonably priced, but IIRC carelessly assembled and a bit floppy.

  • Ponchoman49 Ponchoman49 on Apr 17, 2019

    Definitely the stretched to the limit K/Y New Yorker and Imperial. They looked like something that GM might have rejected 5-6 years earlier and were looking by this point quite outdated with their boxy square vinyl roof encrusted opera lamp shapes. The interiors were lavish but these cars were too narrow. Then there was the horrid Ultra Drive trans axles that were being replaced at a feverish pace across every Chrysler dealership in the nation. The one sort of bright spot was the 3.3 and 3.8 Chrysler designed V6's. But by this point Cadillac had there much improved and more powerful 200 Hp 4.9 V8 out and Ford of course had the 4.6 Mod motor. Honorable mentions going to the Hyundai Excel/ Kia Sephia and the any of the crap Daewoo products being sold. My folks, who were retired by this point went to work part time for Enterprise rental and said these were the worst cars in their fleets and were always having to go to the dealer for repair work. Mom also mentioned how the carpeting or flooring felt like someone glued hair fibers on a piece of cardboard and was really difficult to clean on some of the Mitsubishi's and Kias at the time. True cheap crap.

  • ToolGuy North America is already the greatest country on the planet, and I have learned to be careful about what I wish for in terms of making changes. I mean, if Greenland wants to buy JDM vehicles, isn't that for the Danes to decide?
  • ToolGuy Once again my home did not catch on fire and my fire extinguisher(s) stayed in the closet, unused. I guess I threw my money away on fire extinguishers.(And by fire extinguishers I mean nuclear missiles.)
  • Carson D The UAW has succeeded in organizing a US VW plant before. There's a reason they don't teach history in the schools any longer. People wouldn't make the same mistakes.
  • B-BodyBuick84 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport of course, a 7 seater, 2.4 turbo-diesel I4 BOF SUV with Super-Select 4WD, centre and rear locking diffs standard of course.
  • Corey Lewis Think how dated this 80s design was by 1995!
Next