By on April 2, 2019

General Motors Renaissance Center

General Motors’ legal team has requested that the lawsuit filed by the United Automobile Workers, which claims that its decision to idle factories is in violation of an existing union agreement, be dismissed by a federal judge. The UAW alleges that GM sidestepped the collective bargaining agreement established in 2015 by closing plants prematurely. But the automaker has been careful to say that the facilities are being “unallocated,” claiming the union failed to adhere to the grievance arbitration procedure outlined in its contract — which forbids UAW from going to court until all other avenues have been exhausted.

The request came with a bundle of other motions, filed on March 21st, and included a request to transfer the case from Youngstown, Ohio (where the contentious Lordstown Assembly is located) to the eastern district of Michigan. 

The motion claims the move would be for the “convenience of the parties, witnesses, and in the interest of justice.” Firstly, both GM and the UAW are headquartered there. But General Motors is also concerned it might not get a fair shake so close to Lordstown. “The mere presence of one of these facilities in the judicial district (Northern District of Ohio) is insufficient for venue to properly lie here,” the motion states.

The UAW sued GM in February over a breach the contract claim. It was attempting to stop the company from shuttering its assembly plant in Lordstown — along with transmission plants in White Marsh, Maryland, and Warren, Michigan.

According to The Detroit News, the GM motion says two grievances over plant idling are technically still pending. Obviously, the UAW doesn’t see things in the same manner.

[Image: General Motors]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

6 Comments on “General Motors Asks Judge to Dismiss UAW Case...”


  • avatar

    Strike!

    GM hates America.

  • avatar
    tylanner

    UAW members ought to be ashamed of this tactic….

    “We didn’t discontinue the Cruze because of something the local union did or didn’t do,” Flores wrote. “It was a market-driven decision to discontinue the Cruze, and there were no products to allocate to Lordstown.”

    • 0 avatar
      Erikstrawn

      GM is still making vehicles in China to sell here. GM ought to be ashamed of their tactics. I’m fine with making GM products in China to sell in China, but don’t wave your American heritage around and then offshore the jobs producing cars to sell here.

      • 0 avatar
        A Scientist

        While I don’t have much love for unions and pretty much never defend them, I have to agree with Erikstrawn on this one.

      • 0 avatar
        NormSV650

        If the product is near the top of the segment and the price at the bottom with a longer Buick warranty than the economy offerings from Toyota or Honda, guess where my money is best spent?


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • redapple: Hatch struts still work? W T Fudge? My sawed off broomstick handle was always in the back.
  • kosmo: “How’s that Ranger Raptor coming, Ford? Oh, it isn’t? I see. Thanks for the mobility scooter,...
  • dividebytube: When I’m down south I’m taken aback by the number of decent looking old trucks and even G...
  • redapple: RED…. Great catch. Love it.
  • teddyc73: What an ugly rear end.

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributors

  • Timothy Cain, Canada
  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Mark Baruth, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States