2019 Subaru Ascent Premier Review - In a Big Country

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems
Fast Facts

2019 Subaru Ascent Premier

Turbocharged 2.4-liter horizontally opposed inline-four (260 hp @ 5600 rpm; 277 lb-ft @ 2000-4800 rpm)
Continuously-variable transmission, all-wheel drive
22 city / 26 highway / 20 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
11.6 city / 9.0 highway / 10.4 combined (NRCan Rating, L/100km)
15.7 (observed mileage, MPG)
Base Price: $45,670 US / $51,895 CAD
As Tested: $45,670 USD / $51,895 CAD
Prices include $975 destination charge in the United States and $1,900 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can't be directly compared.
2019 subaru ascent premier review in a big country

Approaching my Ascent tester behind a not-so-local dealer, I felt a presence. Like a pre-war bank, this thing was solid, monolithic, immovable, looming over all of humanity and granting entry to only a choice few. Given the profit Subaru’s going to make off these things, it’s not an inaccurate comparison.

The last Subaru I drove was an Impreza. Not a WRX or its hotter sister, but a stock Impreza sedan. You don’t see many of them. Before that, it was a Crosstrek. Or was it a Forester? No matter, really. Before that, it was a friend’s short-lived SVX, some 16 or so years ago.

Compared to those compact rides, the midsize Ascent crossover is like the HMS Dreadnought moored alongside a torpedo boat, and that’s exactly what Americans — or what Subaru thinks Americans — want. Thankfully, having found myself behind the wheel of a great number of crossovers of late, the Ascent at least held some quirks to set itself apart.

I know, I know, Matthew Guy covered much of this same ground not long ago in his Ascent review, but two observations are better than one. Bear with me!

Easing the Ascent’s bulk out onto a disgustingly slush-filled February street, the crossover’s firm and supportive seats positively oozed Subaru; it’s a comfort I’ve come to expect from the brand, and it’s one I appreciate. Owners won’t want for coddling. It helps that this was a top-flight Premier (the equivalent of a Touring trim in the U.S.) decked out with every last bell and whistle; rich brown leather covering the seven chairs (larger broods can order eight), EyeSight driver assist features up the wazoo, and, of course, the sense of invulnerability afforded by a high-riding perch.

Get new and used Subaru Ascent pricing here!

In high-speed highway driving, the Ascent’s steering felt … effortless. A little too effortless. Searching in vain for a sport mode button or knob to firm things up, I realized this vehicle’s mission. It isn’t meant to thrill moms and dads on the nights the kids are at their grandparents, or even impress the less aged coworkers at their office. It isn’t meant to get the younger crowd hot under the collar at the idea of buying a crossover. The pretense of sportiness seen with so many other vehicles in this category? Absent. No, the Ascent is just a lot of rolling space. Capable, well buttoned-up space that’s easy for anyone to drive, regardless of arm strength.

Basically, Job One for any crossover. It’s easy to forget that Subaru’s a newbie to the midsize segment.

In a burst of equity, Subaru offers but one powertrain in the Ascent, regardless of trim, and it’s an unusual one — a turbocharged 2.4-liter boxer four, good for 260 hp and 277 lb-ft of torque, mated to a continuously variable transmission. In a fairly homogeneous field, Subaru offered something different under the hood.

And there’s nothing wrong with that, except for the fact that the engine’s fairly noisy, and only in a good way after the thing really warms up. It was frigid the week I had the Ascent, and taking off after a cold startup prompted the same intrusive CVT whine Mr. Guy complained about. On one particularly vortex-plagued morning, the tranny acted like a conventional autobox that couldn’t get out of first gear.

Would the revs ever drop? I waited with baited breath.

On warmer days, the boxer’s truck-like rumble stirred something primal in this driver’s psyche, though buyers of vehicles with a similar price tag would probably demand a little more sound-deadening insulation with their ride.

It snowed that week, too. Oh God, did it snow, and it was in this inclimate weather that time spent behind the Ascent’s wheel entered the realm of “fun.” Subaru’s ever-present symmetrical full-time all-wheel drive (was there ever an automotive term burned so deeply into the public consciousness?) ensured that its largest model is just as adept at tackling the white stuff as any other of the brand’s offerings, blasting through snow like a record producer and not afraid to get a little tail happy when urged. Flappy paddles — the only nod to performance in sight — came in handy on the wintry backroads, through I wasn’t able to find any inclines steep enough to give drivetrain-nannying X-Mode (with Hill Descent) a whirl.

While there’s no chance of heart palpitations during acceleration and passing maneuvers, your average Ascent owner likely won’t find its power lacking, nor will they find much to gripe about on rough roads. As always, taller sidewalls would have helped soften the blow of urban cracks and crevasses, but alas, loaded press fleet crossovers call for 20-inchers — even in winter.

Further evidence of this vehicle’s true purpose can be found in the fact the Ascent, regardless of trim, has not four, not eight, not 12, but 19 cupholders. America! The [s]Beverage King[/s] Ascent clearly does not wish to see occupants grow dehydrated during long road trips. Entertainment won’t be an issue, either — at least, not in this high-zoot trim level, where every occupant has access to a USB port. There’s enough connection points of various types in the Ascent’s cabin to keep an FBI surveillance team humming away for hours.

It’s nice that Subaru went with a fairly stodgy profile for its big guy, otherwise I’d have grazed my scalp while sitting in the back row. Didn’t happen here. I was pleased to find climate vents back there, too, as third-row occupants needn’t adopt the role of steerage-class passengers in a coming-to-America film.

While Subaru’s two-screen center stack presents a familiar sight in the Ascent, another quirk quickly made itself known. On an undulating freeway, the crossover’s light steering (it starts to tighten up over 40 mph, but not enough for my liking) left me feeling uneasy. Time to bolster the defences. Unfortunately, a cursory scan of the steering wheel and dash showed no trace of a lane-hold switch in all the usual hangouts. It was only after I exited the freeway and stopped at a light did I discover the little scamp hiding above my head, near the sunglasses holder.

Subaru does a good job creating a rich-feeling, semi-premium cabin, and the model’s capability in bad weather and backcountry shouldn’t be a matter of doubt. I only wish I had a chance to test it in summer, if only to gauge its fuel economy. Despite its four-cylinder powerplant, the cold weather, soft winter rubber, and excessive idling (defrosting can take time) all conspired to return a combined figure of 15.7 mpg for the week. The EPA rates it at 22 mpg combined.

The verdict? A solid effort from Subaru — it’s a vehicle that gets the basics right, minor quibbles aside. However, if you can live without a panoramic sunroof, 20-inch wheels, stereo upgrade, and ultra-sumptuous seats, you might find the purchase of a lower-trim Ascent easier to rationalize.

[Images: Steph Willems/TTAC]

Join the conversation
2 of 43 comments
  • HotPotato HotPotato on Mar 21, 2019

    In the pix it looks like this has a lower floor than most CUVs. Did they reclaim those vertical inches for interior room? Looks like they kept the pointless body lift to a minimum too. Is the hip height a little lower than other CUVs and does that pay off in cornering stability? CUVs are station wagons. Subaru seems to be making minimal effort to pretend otherwise, and I applaud that. The one exception is the front third of the car --- engine compartment and fenders -- which is way too tall, looking ungainly and compromising visibility for nothing. A boxer takes up very little vertical real estate, so there's no practical reason for this.

  • Ponchoman49 Ponchoman49 on Mar 26, 2019

    An old friend of mine recently bought one of these in a lower trim level. His MPG is not far off what you recorded this Winter with the average coming in around 16. In the warmer months that figure climbs to around 19-19.5 so 22 combined is a stretch unless more highway miles is calculated in of course. Tall heavy boxes on large diameter wheels conspire to give not so great MPG despite the cylinder count and trick CVT transmissions. He has had to take it in for an Air bag warning light that would come on randomly while driving and his bluetooth connection has been troublesome but otherwise he seems to like it.

  • Nrd515 I bought an '88 S10 Blazer with the 4.3. We had it 4 years and put just about 48K on it with a bunch of trips to Nebraska and S. Dakota to see relatives. It had a couple of minor issues when new, a piece of trim fell off the first day, and it had a seriously big oil leak soon after we got it. The amazinly tiny starter failed at about 40K, it was fixed under some sort of secret warranty and we got a new Silverado as a loaner. Other than that, and a couple of tires that blew when I ran over some junk on the road, it was a rock. I hated the dash instrumentation, and being built like a gorilla, it was about an inch and a half too narrow for my giant shoulders, but it drove fine, and was my second most trouble free vehicle ever, only beaten by my '82 K5 Blazer, which had zero issues for nearly 50K miles. We sold the S10 to a friend, who had it over 20 years and over 400,000 miles on the original short block! It had a couple of transmissions, a couple of valve jobs, a rear end rebuild at 300K, was stolen and vandalized twice, cut open like a tin can when a diabetic truck driver passed out(We were all impressed at the lack of rust inside the rear quarters at almost 10 years old, and it just went on and on. Ziebart did a good job on that Blazer. All three of his sons learned to drive in it, and it was only sent to the boneyard when the area above the windshield had rusted to the point it was like taking a shower when it rained. He now has a Jeep that he's put a ton of money into. He says he misses the S10's reliablity a lot these days, the Jeep is in the shop a lot.
  • Jeff S Most densely populated areas have emission testing and removing catalytic converters and altering pollution devices will cause your vehicle to fail emission testing which could effect renewing license plates. In less populated areas where emission testing is not done there would probably not be any legal consequences and the converter could either be removed or gutted both without having to buy specific parts for bypassing emissions. Tampering with emission systems would make it harder to resell a vehicle but if you plan on keeping the vehicle and literally running it till the wheels fall off there is not much that can be done if there is no emission testing. I did have a cat removed on a car long before mandatory emission testing and it did get better mpgs and it ran better. Also had a cat gutted on my S-10 which was close to 20 years old which increased performance and efficiency but that was in a state that did not require emission testing just that reformulated gas be sold during the Summer months. I would probably not do it again because after market converters are not that expensive on older S-10s compared to many of the newer vehicles. On newer vehicles it can effect other systems that are related to the operating and the running of the vehicle. A little harder to defeat pollution devices on newer vehicles with all the systems run by microprocessors but if someone wants to do it they can. This law could be addressing the modified diesels that are made into coal rollers just as much as the gasoline powered vehicles with cats. You probably will still be able to buy equipment that would modify the performance of a vehicles as long as the emission equipment is not altered.
  • ToolGuy I wonder if Vin Diesel requires DEF.(Does he have issues with Sulfur in concentrations above 15ppm?)
  • ToolGuy Presented for discussion: https://xroads.virginia.edu/~Hyper2/thoreau/civil.html
  • Kevin Ford can do what it's always done. Offer buyouts to retirement age employees, and transfers to operating facilities to those who aren't retirement age. Plus, the transition to electric isn't going to be a finger snap one time event. It's going to occur over a few model years. What's a more interesting question is: Where will today's youth find jobs in the auto industry given the lower employment levels?