GM Begins Axing 4,000 Salaried Workers

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Last Friday’s whisperings of a “Black Monday” panned out, with General Motors announcing the elimination of roughly 4,000 salaried workers — part of a preexisting pledge to reduce its North American workforce by 15 percent.

Pink slips are in the process of being handed out, an unwanted delivery that should take two weeks to complete. In total, GM hopes to cull 8,000 salaried workers and reduce its executive ranks by 25 percent.

Part of the plan to slim down its 54,000-strong North American workforce by 15,000 employees includes the shuttering of five plants, three of which crank out doomed GM car models.

According to sources who spoke to Reuters, Monday’s targets include hundreds of positions at its information technology centers in Texas, Georgia, Arizona, and Michigan. As well, more than 1,000 jobs are said to be lost at GM’s Warren, Michigan Tech Center. The job cuts were revealed via mass layoff notices sent to state agencies.

In correspondence with Reuters, GM spokesman Pat Morrissey said, “These actions are necessary to secure the future of the company, including preserving thousands of jobs in the U.S. and globally. We are taking action now while the overall economy and job market are strong, increasing the ability of impacted employees to continue to advance in their careers, should they choose to do so.”

This round of cuts comes two months after the automaker eliminated 1,500 contract workers. Some 2,300 salaried workers have already accepted a voluntary buyout, Morrissey said.

As for Canadian layoffs, those are largely complete, CBC reports.

While the Canadian Oshawa Assembly plant is doomed, the fate of Ohio’s Lordstown Assembly and Michigan’s Detroit-Hamtramck facility will be the subject of much debate and advocacy as UAW bargaining talks get started this summer. From these plants pour forth the Chevrolet Cruze, Volt, and Impala, Buick LaCrosse, Cadillac XTS and CT6. Production should cease by the end of the year.

GM claims it plans to keep the CT6 on dealer lots, either by shipping the sedan from China or, ideally, moving production to an alternate U.S. plant.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 30 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Feb 05, 2019

    @highdesertcat--You are probably right the Government will not let GM fail. GM has a few vehicles worth saving such as the Tahoe, Suburban, and Corvette but the plant equipment would be a good buy for pennies on the dollar. I don't think Barra and the board are through with the cutting and downsizing. Buick should be a Chinese specific brand. GM needs to get rid of the designers that designed the new Silverado such an ugly truck and much too important a product for GM to mess up. GM should also get rid of Daewoo they don't need it anymore and it is a drain on GM.

    • Highdesertcat Highdesertcat on Feb 05, 2019

      " I don’t think Barra and the board are through with the cutting and downsizing. " I agree. The reality is here. These chickens have come home to roost. But at least a 1000 or so GM workers have been offered jobs in other plants for now.

  • TheEndlessEnigma TheEndlessEnigma on Feb 06, 2019

    Looks like a disproportionate number of cuts are focused on IT and R&D. That makes sense. As long as the CEO looks good that's all that matters.

  • Dartman EBFlex will soon be able to buy his preferred brand!
  • Mebgardner I owned 4 different Z cars beginning with a 1970 model. I could already row'em before buying the first one. They were light, fast, well powered, RWD, good suspenders, and I loved working on them myself when needed. Affordable and great styling, too. On the flip side, parts were expensive and mostly only available in a dealers parts dept. I could live with those same attributes today, but those days are gone long gone. Safety Regulations and Import Regulations, while good things, will not allow for these car attributes at the price point I bought them at.I think I will go shop a GT-R.
  • Lou_BC Honda plans on investing 15 billion CAD. It appears that the Ontario government and Federal government will provide tax breaks and infrastructure upgrades to the tune of 5 billion CAD. This will cover all manufacturing including a battery plant. Honda feels they'll save 20% on production costs having it all localized and in house.As @ Analoggrotto pointed out, another brilliant TTAC press release.
  • 28-Cars-Later "Its cautious approach, which, along with Toyota’s, was criticized for being too slow, is now proving prescient"A little off topic, but where are these critics today and why aren't they being shamed? Why are their lunkheaded comments being memory holed? 'Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.' -Orwell, 1984
  • Tane94 A CVT is not the kiss of death but Nissan erred in putting CVTs in vehicles that should have had conventional automatics. Glad to see the Murano is FINALLY being redesigned. Nostalgia is great but please drop the Z car -- its ultra-low sales volume does not merit continued production. Redirect the $$$ into small and midsize CUVs/SUVs.
Next