February Might Be the Month to Love a Jag

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Jaguar hopes U.S. buyers fling some woo its way this month, and it’s flinging bundles of cash at dealers to make it happen.

As the British brand is reportedly incentivizing its U.S. dealers to go above and beyond to break sales targets in the early part of 2018, savvy customers stand a good chance of finding a bargain.

The info comes by way of CarsDirect, which reports the brand is offering high-volume dealers up to $100,000 to surpass targets for the two-month period ending February 28th. Jaguar has already adjusted financing offers to lure buyers into the showroom, where salespeople might feel compelled to go lower.

On February 9th, Jaguar began offering zero percent financing on most models — an increasingly scarce rate. That offer applies to the brand’s biggest money maker, the F-Pace. CarsDirect reports a financing offer of 0 percent for 60 months on Jag’s best-selling model, with $2,500 in bonuses thrown in. Slow-selling models like the XJ sedan can be had with up to $8,000 in unadvertised incentives, the publication claims.

While sales of Jaguar-brand vehicles rose a modest 1.2 percent in the U.S. in 2018, the marque finds itself battered by market forces. Its diesel-heavy lineup doesn’t mix well with Europe’s new hatred of oil-burning vehicles, and passenger car sales continue to fall, especially in America. Jaguar Land Rover lost a lot of month last quarter.

In January, U.S. sales of the Jaguar XE sedan sank 31.4 percent, year over year, with the midsize XF falling 52.7 percent. XF sales fell 25.5 percent. The F-Type coupe and convertible saw its volume decline 9 percent last month. The volume leader F-Pace, on the other hand, saw its year-over-year popularity rise 23.5 percent. Compact E-Pace sales came in at 447 units, though a year-over-year comparison isn’t helpful, as the vehicle only entered the market in January 2018.

[Image: Jaguar Land Rover]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 11 comments
  • Civicjohn Civicjohn on Feb 14, 2019

    The point is a high amount of cars in CA are leases, every manufacturer plays the game, and it will help them move some metal. All of my friends in the music/ entertainment industry lease their cars, either by a “car allowance” in their compensation package or they simply make enough to cover the lease payment and they just view it as a monthly expense, like the electric bill. I think having any type of monthly car payment is a disease, but some need to keep up their reputation. But a Caddy? They’ll pick a Jag over that any day.

    • See 4 previous
    • Outsider819 Outsider819 on Feb 17, 2019

      @indi500fan Unfortunately, in this day and age of evermore expensive and complex electronics in vehicles, keeping a purchased vehicle long term is going to get a lot tougher. So, if you keep that in mind and estimate you'll be switching cars every few years, a heavily incentivized lease on a new Jag can make a fair bit of sense.

  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Feb 14, 2019

    Just reduce number of models and prices. Simplify model line like Apple did. Get rid of this ridiculous model designations - I have no idea what all these XF, XJ, X-Pace and so on mean - very similar how Lincoln used to name its cars.

  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
Next