Blame China: Jaguar Land Rover Layoffs Won't Be Exclusive to Europe

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

On Thursday, Jaguar Land Rover was reported to be in the midst of a plan that would eventually lay off roughly 10 percent of its UK workforce — roughly 4,500 employees. Considering the company has been forced to endure waning demand for sedans and just about everything with a diesel engine, a bit of restructuring was inevitable. Especially since everyone else is doing it at the moment.

However, JLR’s layoffs won’t be exclusive to Europe, as initially presumed. Despite the vast majority of its workforce residing in the United Kingdom, a small portion of its American staff will likely feel the impact, too.

According to Automotive News, a company spokesman would not confirm the number of U.S. employees to be furloughed, but was willing to confirm global layoffs on Friday.

“The reduction does affect our global organization, though the largest impact will be in the U.K. as this is the location of the majority of our workforce,” he explained. “Details of the implementation in other countries outside the U.K. are being finalized. We can confirm there will be a position reduction in North America resulting in a modest number of employee separations.”

In addition to the woeful handling of Brexit causing serious problems for JLR, the company also saw a nearly 22-percent sales decline in China. America was much stronger, with Land Rover having a record year in 2018 (up 23 percent from 2017) while Jaguar languished due to lackluster sedan sales (dropping 23 percent).

Globally, JLR confirmed an overall drop across both brands of 4.6 percent compared with 2017. According to the automaker’s own sales statistics, only about 181,000 of the the 592,708 vehicles JLR sold last year were Jaguars. That was enough to push up Land Rover by 1.2 percent and drop Jag by 6.9 percent against last year’s figures.

From Automotive News:

The company, owned by India’s Tata Group, announced last year a turnaround plan that calls for savings of 2.5 billion [British] pounds in 18 months. Of that total, 1 billion pounds will come from cutting 500 million pounds each from its investment plans for the 2019 and 2020 financial years, the company has said.

“China has driven the sharp deterioration in profits. It’s the single biggest challenge,” JLR’s finance chief, Ken Gregor, told analysts on a financial results call in November. Gregor said that the firm’s Changshu plant in China “has basically been closed for most of October in order to allow the inventory of both our vehicles and dealer inventory to start to reduce.”

Diesel accounts for 90 percent of the automaker’s British sales and 45 percent of global demand, the company said last year. Diesel demand has plunged following new levies in the wake of the Volkswagen Group emissions-cheating scandal.

That trend has only been encouraged by the adoption of the Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicle Test Procedure and most governments’ damnation of diesel. And yet JLR’s biggest problems are still ahead of it. The company cautioned there could be additional losses if the United Kingdom leaves the European Union with a poor trade deal or no deal at all. The EU has been playing hardball since the Brexit vote and it’s unclear if its vehicles would be subject to new tariffs.

While the brunt of its workforce resides in England, JLR has added employees in China and Slovakia via new factories. It’s presumed that those countries will gradually assume a larger share of production as the years roll on. By contrast, JLR only employs around 400 people in the United States.

[Image: Jaguar Land Rover]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
 7 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Jan 11, 2019

    Is it even possible to lay off workers in England? Isn't it a socialist country? Do they get generous pension when laid off? At least they do not need to worry about health insurance.

    • See 4 previous
    • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Jan 13, 2019

      @Get Necked Ya Dumb Nigger! There are plenty of no go zones in Europe so I do not buy this argument.

  • Tstag Tstag on Jan 12, 2019

    Trumps a closet socialist. Think about his support for trade barriers... his love of Russia....

  • Ltcmgm78 It depends on whether or not the union is a help or a hindrance to the manufacturer and workers. A union isn't needed if the manufacturer takes care of its workers.
  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
Next