So Long, Synergy? Toyota Wants to Break From Its Hybrid Naming Tradition

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems
so long synergy toyota wants to break from its hybrid naming tradition

Despite long, grinding years of adulthood, the word “synergy” still reminds this author of the character on the excruciatingly 1980s cartoon Jem and the Holograms, which his older sister would commandeer the TV set for on various mornings. To Toyota, the word is the centerpiece of Hybrid Synergy Drive — the name applied to its hybrid drivetrains since the dawn of the gas-electric era.

Times change and, just as hoop earrings are no longer rad, the word “hybrid” has evolved to mean any one of a confusingly long list of gas-electric propulsion systems. Studies show that a great many consumers are still mystified about hybrids.

Hybrid Synergy Drive needs a makeover.

Speaking to Automotive News, Ed Laukes, Toyota Motor North America’s marketing boss, claims his company needs to move in a new direction to end the confusion.

“There have been so many variants of hybrids: our version of what we refer to as hybrid technology versus something maybe you saw from General Motors or something you saw from Ford,” Laukes said at the L.A. Auto Show, site of two Toyota hybrid introductions. “Those variants have confused the consumer, ultimately. They don’t even know what hybrid actually even means.”

Thanks to years of bad marketing on the part of OEMs and poor reporting on the part of the news media, too many consumers believe “hybrid” always signifies the presence of a plug, or even the lack of a gas engine altogether. The rise of the word “electrification,” along with the presence of PHEVs, has further muddied the waters. Automakers (some more than others) are keen to brag about their future “electrified” lineups, carefully avoiding mention that this just means one variant of each model in their lineup will boast, at minimum, a hybrid powerplant.

Because of this, Toyota’s signature hybrid name “could go away over time,” Laukes said, without mentioning how exactly Toyota plans to describe the powertrain to the buyer.

“We’re still a long ways away from making that decision of how that’s going to happen,” he said. “But we have to figure out a way to be able to amplify the messaging around all these different powertrains.”

He added, “There could be potentially some name in the future that could represent multiple alternative powertrains.”

Well, this scenario sounds like it could compound the confusing, especially in the absence of a name addition signifying which alternative powertrain lies beneath the hood of the vehicle. While consumers would know that a certain vehicle is green, they wouldn’t know to what extent. If battery electric vehicles are scary due to range concerns, and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles vanishingly rare due to infrastructure limitations, would-be buyers could hear the green word, jump to the wrong conclusion, and immediately state “Oh, that’s the one that’s not for me.”

Of course, Toyotas has well-paid people on staff to predict and avoid this situation, so it’s possible everything will work out tickety-boo.

Sam De La Garza, marketing chief for Toyota’s small car lineup, suggested to AN that hybrids face the same problem that turbocharged vehicles once grappled with. That issue has since been worked out, he claimed. Has it? Some might suggest that Ford’s naming strategy for its line of turbo mills — Ecoboost — could come across as confusing. It sounds like the name you’d give an engine with electric assist, not turbo assist.

Maybe I’m just used to picking on Ford.

[Image: Toyota]

Join the conversation
4 of 14 comments
  • Brandloyalty Brandloyalty on Dec 03, 2018

    When it comes to hybrids, everyone knows what a Prius is and that it gets good mileage. That's about it. They don't SEE the myriads of other hybrids on the roads, they have no clue about how they work, and they have even less knowledge about the hybrid/phev distinction. My friends are well educated people. They don't notice that my Escape is a hybrid, and that it doesn't shift. When informed it is a hybrid they are surprised to learn I don't plug it in. While they are concerned about the environment, it does not register that they can use 40% less gas and not change their lifestyles at all. Since I bought the hybrid, not a single person I know who has bought a vehicle has bought a hybrid. While I admit to being somewhat oblivious about hybrids before I first test drove one, at least I had them in mind.

  • George B George B on Dec 03, 2018

    Part of the problem is that full hybrids offer the most advantage in horrible stop and go traffic congestion where the hybrid can creep forward with the gas engine stopped. Nobody wants to think about buying a car specifically for being stuck in traffic congestion. Maybe car manufacturers need to develop more luxury hybrids where the emphasis is on electric motor torque and smooth, quiet power delivery, not highest fuel economy numbers on the EPA test cycle.

    • See 1 previous
    • Tonyd Tonyd on Dec 04, 2018

      @brandloyalty Let me show you the NEW corolla/camry/civic/accord..... it gets 50 mpg anywhere and everywhere. Is there anything special about it? Nope! the long pedal makes it go and the short one makes it stop. What color do you like?

  • Lou_BC "They are the worst kind of partisan - the kind that loves their team more than they want to know the truth."Ummm...yeah....Kinda like birtherism, 2020 election stolen, vast voter fraud, he can have top secret documents at Mar-lago, he's a savvy business man, and hundreds more.
  • FreedMike This article fails to mention that Toyota is also investing heavily in solid state battery tech - which would solve a lot of inherent EV problems - and plans to deploy it soon. course, Toyota being Toyota, it will use the tech in hybrids first, which is smart - that will give them the chance to iron out the wrinkles, so to speak. But having said that, I’m with Toyota here - I’m not sold on an all EV future happening anytime soon. But clearly the market share for these vehicles has nowhere to go but up; how far up depends mainly on charging availability. And whether Toyota’s competitors are all in is debatable. Plenty of bet-hedging is going on among makers in the North American market.
  • Jeff S I am not against EVs but I completely understand Toyota's position. As for Greenpeace putting Toyota at the bottom of their environmental list is more drama. A good hybrid uses less gas, is cleaner than most other ICE, and is more affordable than most EVs. Prius has proven longevity and low maintenance cost. Having had a hybrid Maverick since April and averaging 40 to 50 mpg in city driving it has been smooth driving and very economical. Ford also has very good hybrids and some of the earlier Escapes are still going strong at 300k miles. The only thing I would have liked in my hybrid Maverick would be a plug in but it didn't come with it. If Toyota made a plug in hybrid compact pickup like the Maverick it would sell well. I would consider an EV in the future but price, battery technology, and infrastructure has to advance and improve. I don't buy a vehicle based on the recommendation of Greenpeace, as a status symbol, or peer pressure. I buy a vehicle on what best needs my needs and that I actually like.
  • Mobes Kind of a weird thing that probably only bothers me, but when you see someone driving a car with ball joints clearly about to fail. I really don't want to be around a car with massive negative camber that's not intentional.
  • Jeff S How reliable are Audi? Seems the Mazda, CRV, and Rav4 in the higher trim would not only be a better value but would be more reliable in the long term. Interior wise and the overall package the Mazda would be the best choice.