Ghosn Planned to Oust Nissan CEO Prior to Arrest in Japan, Sources Claim

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Prior to his arrest in Japan last month over presumed financial misconduct, Carlos Ghosn was allegedly planning to remove Nissan CEO Hiroto Saikawa. The plot has certainly thickened.

Ghosn, who was serving as Nissan Motor Co.’s chairman before being taken into custody, was believed to be on the cusp of an upper-level management shakeup within the Renault–Nissan–Mitsubishi Alliance. Part of that plan included finding a new CEO for Nissan, according to inside sources.

The Wall Street Journal, who broke the story, reported that timeline of the managerial restructuring was cloudy but involved a meeting scheduled for November with Ghosn hoping to pull the trigger by next spring. “He was getting ready for a shakeup that was going to affect Saikawa,” one source claimed. “It was a path to a different CEO.”

However, any ousting of Saikawa would likely require is involvement in some high-profile scandal (which may yet happen) and/or approval from the automaker’s management board. Bloomberg later claimed that people familiar with Ghosn’s case and Nissan’s operations said there was no plan to eject Saikawa prior to the end of his term, which is slated to continue through April of 2019.

Nissan said it cannot comment on matter at this time. But we can speculate as to why Ghosn might have wanted the CEO removed. Nissan’s financial performance under Saikawa hasn’t been the mind-blowing success story it was when Carlos at the helm. The company’s operating income dropped by 17 percent in the first half of 2018.

Saikawa also pulled back on Ghosn’s strategy of setting extremely ambitious volume targets and has taken heat from the former chairman over the automaker’s continued involvement in the final-inspection scandal that has persisted within its home country. Thus far, Nissan is believed to have recalled at least 1 million vehicles in Japan for failing to adhere to national safety mandates.

The pair have also been ad odds over the on extended power struggle taking place within the Renault–Nissan–Mitsubishi Alliance, an issue Ghosn spent most of 2018 trying to downplay. It’s clear Ghosn he saw the the Alliance as his baby and even seemed to be pushing for a full-blown merger for a while. However, Saikawa stressed the importance of Nissan remaining independent, echoing the tone of its Japanese investors. In July, Carlos attempted to calm shareholders who had caught wind of consolidation rumors.

“Anybody who will ask Nissan and Mitsubishi to become wholly owned subsidiaries of Renault has zero chance of getting a result,” Ghosn said over the summer. “We have not done it for the last 19 years. We’re not going to change today.”

Be that as it may, the former chairman also expressed a dire need for Alliance members to solidify their relationship before its current high-level decision makers retire. There’s a possibility Ghosn had very specific designs for that, which included a new CEO for Nissan that would see things his way.

Monday marks end of Ghosn’s 22-day detention, having been held without charge since his arrest on suspicion of under-reporting compensation for five years. While there’s no guarantee what will happen next, some have posited that he’ll be re-arrested prior to any official indictment. Legal experts have also claimed Japan may dub him a flight risk and deny bail — a relatively common practice that the nation has been criticized for in the past. Japan has a ludicrously high conviction rate and sometimes goes to greater lengths to punish non-violent crimes than Western nations. The United Nations, Japan Federation of Bar Associations, and various human rights groups have criticized the country’s legal system in the past.

Prosecutors are also rumored to hold Nissan accountable for publishing the documents which allegedly misrepresented Ghosn’s remuneration. Official charges are expected to be launched soon.

[Image: Nissan]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 10 comments
  • ScarecrowRepair ScarecrowRepair on Dec 09, 2018

    I suspect Ghosn or anybody else was/could have been working on anything exciting enough for this article to have been written at nearly any given time. "Take a card, any card." "Look, the three of clubs!" "What are the odds?" "1 in 52, same as every card."

    • See 3 previous
    • Highdesertcat Highdesertcat on Dec 10, 2018

      @RHD How about the Japanese car brands formerly under Ghosn’s management? Millions of Americans can choose not to buy those either.

  • Flipper35 Flipper35 on Dec 10, 2018

    It may not all be Saikawa's fault. Maybe some people are waking up to the fact there are better built cars out there for the money. I know I will never own another Nissan and I can't be the only one.

  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
  • TheEndlessEnigma Poor planning here, dropping a Vinfast dealer in Pensacola FL is just not going to work. I love Pensacola and that part of the Gulf Coast, but that area is by no means an EV adoption demographic.
Next