Nissan Continued Using Uncertified Inspectors After Misconduct Exposed

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
nissan continued using uncertified inspectors after misconduct exposed

Nissan Motor Co. has recalled 1.2 million new vehicles it sold in Japan over the last three years after discovering vehicle checks were not being performed by certified technicians. After a lengthy internal investigation, the company stated it continued to conduct unaccredited final checks as recently as last week.

News of the discovery came on Wednesday, more than two weeks after Chief Executive Hiroto Saikawa publicly stated only certified technicians had conducted checks since September 20th. Despite attempts to remedy the widespread issue at its Japanese factories, there were at least two technicians lacking the necessary training and credentials at its Shonan Plant located in Tsutsumicho, near Hiratsuka City.

According to Reuters, the company estimates roughly 3,800 vehicles were affected. It temporarily suspended all production at the facility before resuming assembly on October 16th.

Officials from Japan’s Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport inspected Nissan’s factories earlier this month. There, they found names of several certified technicians used on paperwork to sign off on final vehicle checks — inspections that had actually been conducted by non-certified employees.

While it did not state how many more may have been involved in continuing factory misconduct, the ministry found phony stamps being used at five of six Nissan factories earlier this month — resulting in a recall of 386,000 passenger vehicles from this year. It has requested Nissan report the measures taken to prevent a recurrence of the problem by the end of October.

“It’s extremely regrettable, causing anxiety for users and shaking the foundation of the certification system,” said Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Keiichi Ishii.

The ministry stated it will continue to investigate just how common the practice was at Nissan factories and who allowed it to continue. Meanwhile, the automaker has recalled the entirety of its domestic product, promising to conduct re-inspections (at a cost of around $302 million).

[Image: Nissan]

Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • Erikstrawn Erikstrawn on Oct 19, 2017

    Is this a Japanese government requirement, or are these just Nissan's internal inspectors? I know that in the aircraft industry in the US, every part has to have a certificate of conformance from a qualified technician stating that it's airworthy. Does Japan have similar requirements for cars? Does the US have any requirement like this for cars? If it's just Nissan's internal inspectors, it's a bit less scandalous. Also, I work next door to my organization's training manager. Keeping up with everybody's varied certifications can be a massive undertaking.

  • Thegamper Thegamper on Oct 19, 2017

    I bet it is a situation where the "uncertified" inspectors knew perfectly well how to perform the job but simply lacked appropriate government sanctioned certifications. Sort of like a highly regarded doctor or lawyer who didn't pay his annual license dues and suddenly it becomes malpractice for that professional to perform their job. In many areas, like medicine and law, certifications serve an important purpose, others, it is just a way for members of an occupation to keep people from entering said trade. Ill go out on a limb and say that the "certified" inspector probably doesn't require a college degree or doctorate.

  • SCE to AUX Toyota the follower, as usual. It will be 5 years before such a vehicle is available.I can't think of anything innovative from them since the Gen 1 Prius. Even their mythical solid state battery remains vaporware.They look like pre-2009 General Motors. They could fall hard.
  • Chris P Bacon I've always liked the looks of the Clubman, especially the original model. But like a few others here, I've had the Countryman as a rental, and for the price point, I couldn't see spending my own money on one. Maybe with a stick it would be a little more fun, but that 3 cylinder engine just couldn't provide the kick I expected.
  • EBFlex Recall number 13 for the 2020 Explorer and the 2020 MKExplorer.
  • CEastwood Every time something like this is mentioned it almost never happens because the auto maker is afraid of it taking sales away from an existing model - the Tacoma in this instance . It's why VW never brought the Scirrocco and Polo stateside fearful of losing Golf sales .
  • Bca65698966 V6 Accord owner here. The VTEC crossover is definitely a thing, especially after I got a performance tune for the car. The loss of VTEC will probably result in a slower vehicle overall for one reason: power under the curve. While the peak horsepower may remain the same, the amount of horsepower and torque up to that peak may be less overall. The beauty of variable cam lift is not only the ability to gain more power at upper rpm’s on the “big cam”, but the ability to gain torque down low on the “small cam”. Low rpm torque gets the vehicle moving and then big horsepower at upper rpm’s gains speed. Having only one cam profile is now introducing a compromise versus the VTEC setup. I guess it’s possible that with direct injection they are able to keep the low rpm torque there (I’ve read that DI helps with low rpm torque) but I’m skeptical it will match a well tuned variable lift setup.