GM's Eyeing Your Tool Shed, Not Just Your Garage, for Revenue

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

If you’re a GM owner in one of three American cities, you’re already able to put your vehicle on the short-term rental market. Now, imagine if you could do the same for your lawnmower. And that kid of yours hardly ever uses his skateboard anymore. What about those rollerblades you picked up in 1992 but mothballed due to the stigma? Everything’s a possibility in this age of micro-mobility and peer-to-peer sharing.

General Motors’ Maven mobility arm, which started off renting company-owned vehicles to cash-strapped taxi haters before launching a pilot with privately-owned cars and trucks, now has its eye on your yard care appliances — and who knows what else.

While cars and trucks and all that lie in between remains the main focus for Maven, nothing’s off the table when considering the future. The vehicles needn’t be used for transportation purposes, either.

Speaking to Automotive News, Julia Steyn, GM Urban Mobility and Maven’s vice president, goes as far as suggesting a benevolent takeover of Earth by beings from beyond the stars could prove lucrative for GM’s mobility business. (They won’t be peaceful. We’re cooked.)

“If there will be a UFO that is going to be able to be shared, I would expect at some point to be able to put it on the Maven platform,” Steyn said, adding that Maven has its eye on just about anything that sits unused for long periods of time.

That list includes your boat and RV. The appeal of Maven peer-to-peer business is that owners can recoup some of the expense of buying/owning a 2015-or-newer vehicle without serving as an operator, which is how Maven Gig operates. With the pilot, launched this year, owners can just send their vehicle to a new, temporary user for a fee via a phone-based app. It’s something of a collar-tugging proposition for owners, who’d best do a little math before signing on. Maven already has a rival in this field in the form of Turo.

“We strongly believe that this is the new way how people will interact with cars,” Steyn said of the peer-to-peer car-sharing service. GM plans to roll the service out in seven additional cities in the coming year, ensuring additional revenue from those Equinoxes and Cruzes.

The cash collected from Maven’s service flows to owners and GM in a 60:40 split. While Steyn said she pocketed a cool grand from putting her crossover on the market during the pilot’s first month, your mileage (and income) may vary. Wear and tear, regularly scheduled maintenance, and depreciation are areas of concern that could cause the renter to lose out in the long term. It’s hard to hop on board with this idea, at least as far as this writer is concerned.

Still, GM’s all for it, and if more people want to hand over their ride, all the better. While coy about Maven’s profitability, Steyn said the initiative has already “generated significant revenue.” Hmmm. No doubt, fielding vehicles on which owners have already paid full price would certainly help the balance sheet.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • Bimmer Bimmer on Nov 12, 2018

    Next step by GM, who wants to rent their wife/GF, when not in use by a husband/BF?

  • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Nov 13, 2018

    The Turo stuff I have experienced has been the form of people acting like rental companies, right down to fees. In a way this is comforting as the person is running a business, who I would be more loath to rent from would be the gig jag off who engages in this sort of behavior.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next