Lincoln's Used-vehicle Subscription Pilot Isn't Going As Planned

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The service doesn’t receive as much press as the new-car subscription services offered by a growing list of premium automakers, but Lincoln’s pilot project did carry many of the same aspirations. It just didn’t carry new cars.

Launched in California earlier this year, Lincoln’s subscription service offers users a range of older, contemporary models — insured, with maintenance covered — for a monthly fee that, depending on where you live, could secure a decent one-bedroom rental apartment. Perhaps unsurprisingly, Ford’s luxury division says demand for the service isn’t exactly red hot.

Speaking to Automotive News, Lincoln’s director of marketing, sales and service, Robert Parker, said it’s a love-’em-and-leave-’em situation. Besides the overall lack of public interest, the automaker discovered those who do sign up back out after a month or two.

“I’ve been surprised how few people are genuinely interested in that type of ownership,” Parker said. “If you had asked me a year ago, I would have said this is the next big thing. A lot of people are struggling to make the math work.”

Lincoln offers the service via the Ford-owned Canvas app. It was believed that, by swapping in and out of a number of vehicles (MKC, MKZ, MKX, Continental), subscribers might become interested in purchasing a new Lincoln. At the very least, Lincoln would make decent coin off of the 2015-2017 vehicles it preferred not to send to auction. A subscription ranges from $500 to $950 a month.

If that sounds pricey, rival Cadillac’s “Book by Cadillac” subscription service charges a flat $1,800 monthly rate, though users (in New York, Los Angeles, and Dallas) gain access to new vehicles, including the top-flight CT6 and Escalade. The CTS-V, ATS-V, and XT5 round out the collection. Subscription services have garnered more than their fair share of detractors, including Edmunds analyst Ivan Drury, who called it a “rich person’s toy.”

Lincoln’s service ultimately attracted people whose car was in the shop, or were waiting to take delivery on a new vehicle. As such, for many the service was used in place of renting, rather than in place of leasing.

“The amount of people coming out after one or two months is very high,” Parker said. “It’s just kind of an interim process.”

What to do? Lincoln could bring the service closer to the dealership, Parker suggests, or perhaps tinker with vehicle availability. Despite the lacklustre demand, Lincoln doesn’t plan on dropping the service altogether — its potential usefulness in boosting exposure to the brand is too great, Parker said. It’s just a work in progress.

[Image: Lincoln Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 29 comments
  • DEVILLE88 DEVILLE88 on Sep 24, 2018

    Put suicide doors on it and it'll fly out the doors!

  • DeadWeight DeadWeight on Sep 24, 2018

    Another unbelievablly idiotic idea/plan by Ford/Lincoln. They are absolutely clueless. Used (let alone new) Lincolns have about as much prestige - at any price (let alone their delusional, artificially high-fixed prices) - as Kia, and less prestige than Subaru in 99.378% of the nation. As for the tard article posted on TTAC today about higher used vehicle pricing despite higher higher inventories, that analysis did not take into account product mix (e.g. pickup trucks and SUVs), it used average vs median pricing, and did not account for higher interest rates, generally, and the much higher prices credit-impaired buyers, in particular, are now paying for alternative financing methods/sources. The used vehicle market, in general, is in for a hard fall sooner rather than later.

  • Ltcmgm78 Just what we need to do: add more EVs that require a charging station! We own a Volt. We charge at home. We bought the Volt off-lease. We're retired and can do all our daily errands without burning any gasoline. For us this works, but we no longer have a work commute.
  • Michael S6 Given the choice between the Hornet R/T and the Alfa, I'd pick an Uber.
  • Michael S6 Nissan seems to be doing well at the low end of the market with their small cars and cuv. Competitiveness evaporates as you move up to larger size cars and suvs.
  • Cprescott As long as they infest their products with CVT's, there is no reason to buy their products. Nissan's execution of CVT's is lackluster on a good day - not dependable and bad in experience of use. The brand has become like Mitsubishi - will sell to anyone with a pulse to get financed.
  • Lorenzo I'd like to believe, I want to believe, having had good FoMoCo vehicles - my aunt's old 1956 Fairlane, 1963 Falcon, 1968 Montego - but if Jim Farley is saying it, I can't believe it. It's been said that he goes with whatever the last person he talked to suggested. That's not the kind of guy you want running a $180 billion dollar company.
Next