Feds to Big Auto: Spill It


The U.S. Commerce Department wants automakers to whisper in its ear. And by whisper, we mean fill out a 34-page questionnaire detailing all their secrets — the nitty gritty of product planning, suppliers, and finances not already disclosed in public filings — under threat of financial penalty or imprisonment.
As one would assume, this latest chapter in the Commerce Department’s investigation into the possibility that imported autos pose a national security threat to the U.S. isn’t going over well.
“The breadth and depth of this request is invasive, requiring massive amounts of proprietary and confidential business data from global operations — all under the pretense of national security,” Gloria Bergquist, spokeswoman for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, told Bloomberg. The Alliance represents several unnamed automakers who received the questionnaire.
“Frankly, it’s stunning from an administration committed to getting government out of the way of business,” Bergquist said.
The Trump administration kicked off the investigation to determine whether tariffs are needed on imported vehicles and parts. Automakers protested the threatened 25-percent tariff, claiming U.S. consumers would face steep price hikes in the wake of any new import levy. Even vehicles built in the U.S., like the Toyota Camry, stand to see a not-inconsequential MSRP boost.
Many see the threats as Trump’s way of forcing the European Union to back off its own 10 percent import tariffs on foreign autos.
To automakers that received the questionnaire, however, the more immediate issue is the discomfort that comes from spilling your secrets. From Bloomberg:
The Trump administration wants such things as how much each company’s research budget goes to specific areas such as autonomous driving, electric drive, connected vehicles, and lightweight technology. The questionnaire also seeks a list of suppliers for major vehicles systems and where they’re located.
The Trump administration also wants details about company business plans from now until 2020. One section of the questionnaire asked for plans for every global plant, requiring the companies to reveal whether the plants will be expanded, contracted, modernized, or closed. The administration also asked the companies for explanations about why they manufacture in foreign trade zones.
The survey also asks if imports hurt sales, profits or margins. And it directly asks, “How has import competition affected your U.S. manufacturing operations, sales, employment, planned expansions, investments, etc. with respect to the production of passenger cars, light trucks, SUVs and vans from 2013 to Q2 2018.”
Former Commerce Department chief economist Susan Helper said that, in the past, such questionnaires usually targeted the defence industry.
“I can see both sides on this — it is burdensome for companies, but on the other hand it’s important for policy makers to understand global supply chains as they have an increasing impact on the U.S. economy,” she said.
A hearing scheduled for this coming Thursday in Washington will see 45 industry representatives testify in front of the Commerce Department. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross has until February to conclude the investigation and issue a recommendation to Trump.
[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Corey Lewis It was long overdue for a replacement or something, but additionally the Compass and Renegade are both so similar there doesn't seem to be a need for such overlap.
- CoastieLenn Stellantis gonna stellant. Isn't the Compass similarly sized? How is there a hole in the lineup? Seems to me that they had one two many entrants in the compact crossover segment- being the Cherokee and the Compass. The Renegade takes the sub-compact segment, the Grand Cherokee takes the midsize segment (even though it doesn't have third row seating), and the Wagoneer takes the full sized segment. I really want a nice Cherokee Trailhawk V6, but I can never see myself actually buying one because of the litany of documented issues with basically everything in the Dodge/Jeep/Ram inventory. Their current electrical gremlin trajectory rivals that of VW/Audi, but nearly as expensive to repair.
- MaintenanceCosts Washington Highway 410 over Cayuse and Chinook Passes, in the shadow of Mount Rainier.Grand St. Bernard Pass between Switzerland and Italy, close to the Mont Blanc massif.Colorado 82 over Independence Pass. Highest I've ever been in a car.Skyline Drive in Virginia.California Highway 1 from Monterey to Santa Barbara.A million little unnumbered roads in the German Black Forest, more satisfying at 100 km/h than the Autobahn is at 250.
- Kendahl US 60 between Show Low and Globe, Arizona. It's especially fun in the switchbacks on both sides of the Salt River canyon.
- Arthur Dailey What give with this site? I know that I posted a comment. The site says that there are 12 comments. But when I click on the 'see more' button it resets to say that there are 11 comments and I can't see mine. I am not that egotistical as to believe that my comments are important. But that makes me wonder if others are also having their comments 'erased'.
Comments
Join the conversation
Hey, be nice to each other in the comment section, keep it at least relevant and no dog whistle blowing. Now excuse me while I blow this dog whistle, sit back, and watch the comment section blow up. I almost miss Bertel at this point. Almost.
Big Al--Ideally a Free Trade Agreement but if the US cannot reach one then at least have reciprocal tariffs. The US in the past has not negotiated Free Trade Agreements and has gotten the short end of the stick. I agree with Trump that these trade deals should be renegotiated but I don't agree with his approach. It would be better to have no tariffs across the board but that most likely will never happen. Each country wants to protect their market. In the case of China it is more than just free trade, it is the theft of technology. Denver Mike brings up a valid point about the technical barriers especially the EU countries have on vehicles.