Trade War Watch: Trump Launches National Security Investigation On Auto Imports

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
trade war watch trump launches national security investigation on auto imports

President Donald Trump issued a tweet promising car manufacturers good tidings on Wednesday. “There will be big news coming soon for our great American Autoworkers,” he said. “After many decades of losing your jobs to other countries, you have waited long enough!”

Later that same day, the administration announced it had launched a national security investigation into car and truck imports under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. The Commerce Department explained that the probe would investigate whether imported vehicles and parts threaten the domestic industry’s wellbeing, taking into account its ability to develop new technologies and the impact of tariffs.

“There is evidence suggesting that, for decades, imports from abroad have eroded our domestic auto industry,” Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said.

While Ross assures a “thorough, fair and transparent investigation,” opposition to the probe has already begun to emerge. “China opposes the abuse of national security clauses, which will seriously damage multilateral trade systems and disrupt normal international trade order,” Gao Feng, spokesman for the Chinese Ministry of Commerce, said at a news briefing on Thursday.

China recently agreed to cut its tariffs on imported automobiles in a bid to open its market to foreign automakers. This occurred after the U.S. announced new import taxes on steel and aluminum. Meanwhile, America recently worked out a deal with South Korea that involved a tentative promise to open its own market a bit if the western nation agreed to give it a break on steel tariffs.

No such deal exists with Japan. Curious, since it’s one of the United States’ closest security allies and imposes no tariffs on vehicles.

According to Reuters, Germany’s DIHK Chambers of Industries and Commerce said Trump completely ignored the fact that German companies invest heavily in the U.S. and create manufacturing jobs there — a claim that could be similarly made for Japan and South Korea.

“To cite aspects of national security as justification is totally constructed and far-fetched. We almost have to take this as a provocation,” DIHK President Eric Schweitzer said. “I gain more and more the impression that the United States no longer believes in competition for ideas and customers, but only in the right of the supposedly stronger.”

“It fills me with great concern that the U.S. is moving away from a free and fair world trade order,” he added.

The Commerce Department’s claim that the probe is intended to determine if lost domestic production has affected the U.S. economy seems clear cut enough, but analyzing if automakers lost the ability to research advanced technologies is somewhat perplexing. While the United States isn’t the global leader in every category that qualifies as advanced tech, it’s the way in the field of autonomous driving and remains competitive just about everywhere else as far as development is concerned.

A Trump administration official said prior to the probe’s announcement that the expected strategy would be involve pressuring Canada and Mexico to make concessions on NAFTA. Considering how poorly and slowly those talks have progressed, threatening research that could result in higher import fees could be a way to convince them to play ball. The investigation could have a similar goal in regard to other countries that ship a lot of cars to the United States, too.

In a meeting with automakers earlier this month, Trump speculated that tariffs on imported automobiles and parts may be increased. Sources claimed the president said 20 percent or 25 percent on some vehicles, which would represent a massive increase. While trucks have been subject to U.S. import duties of 25 percent for decades, imported cars sit at a only 2.5 percent.

For the sake of comparison, Europe imposes a relatively flat 10 percent import tariff on vehicles. China has said it will reduce its 25 percent fee on automobiles to 15 percent starting this July. However, trucks are expected to stay at 20 percent.

Join the conversation
3 of 117 comments
  • Akear Akear on May 25, 2018

    This should have happened 20 years ago. It no longer matters now. To simplify things just walk away from NAFTA.

  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on May 26, 2018

    Soviet Union was fully self-dependent. Everything was designed and made internally even computer chips and personal computers (which suck BTW and rarely worked). Soviet Union had unlimited resources - that's how it won the war with Germany. After WWII SU was very strong and consolidated country with unbeatable victorious army. Nevertheless SU collapsed in just 40 years after WWII. In contrast America was always divided country in permanent state of civil war cold or hot except of short period of national unity after WWII and 9/11. All Americans care about is mighty $ and happy to sell out everything and lay off all countrymen and send all jobs abroad. Half of Americans at any given moment hate political system, president and party in power. American companies has very short life cycle and grow and die fast - take "mighty" iconic Xerox for example which is in process to be taken over by Fujifilm. Eventually American companies die and have after life in China, Japan or Europe. Nevertheless America somehow not only survived but exported American way of life all over the world including Europe and Asia and totally dominates the world. Germany's and Japan's world domination did not materialize as well as Chinese will not. If some country or axis try to blackmail America or declare war on America America will simply eliminate that country one way or another. Only naive people may think US will never use WMD or overwhelming deadly sanctions or cyber warfare (where America dominates) or assassination using drones or satellites. As a matter of fact US used WMD against civilian population, as well as firebombing, regime change, assassinations of foreign leaders. Just ask Saddam who dared to threaten US and sitting president or Qaddafi who annoyed US. Or watch Kim who dares to challenge US with nuclear weapon (big mistake) to be gone in few years along with his ridiculous and failed regime. And same with Iranian regime which is on death throes already - no need to negotiate with them. So outsourcing less productive job does not threaten national security, but waking the sleeping tiger with overwhelming economic power does and we are not talking about US national security here. Regarding Trump I think it is just negotiation tactics.

    • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on May 27, 2018

      Inside Looking Out, I agree with you regarding the tumultuous history the USA has had. I also agree with you that the US will still be around in the future and still have influence. The amount I don't quite agree or with your scenario. The scenario you present is too rosy. The US will decline, but in a similar fashion to Great Brittan. It will take several decades of gradual loss of influence. Economically the US will gradually wind back a little, just like the UK had done. It doesn't mean living standards will not rise, but will not rise a quickly as other nations. On the global stage you will see a unified EU, China, Japan and even Russia have more input into the resolution of geopolitical issues, ie, Iran, North Korea, etc. This has already begun since the US is dropping out of multilateral agreements of late. As the US dismisses and disagrees with outcomes in the rest of the World it will become more isolated and it will find it harder to do business and influence. The US now doesn't have the global coverage militarily it had only 50 years ago. I essentially see a gradual winding back of US influence, militarily, politically and economically as other nations rise. For the US to become what it once was is near on impossible. I think the US needs to work and collaborate a little more closely with other nations to maintain maximum global influence. As for Donald Trump, he's blown significant opportunities for US influence, ie, Trans Pacific Trade Pact, Paris Accord, Iran, even his recent Korea issue. With Korea he's let in the EU, China, Japan and South Korea to find a resolution. All Trump can do now is go for the ride. Military action against North Korea will be out, as the "rest" of the World will come to a decision on how to manage North Korea. He's blown it on so many fronts and p!ssed off many friends and Allies with his ridiculous stance on trade. Trump is a liability to the US.

  • RICK Once had 78 TOWN COUPE and wish I had never let it go! Ultimate OTT excessive luxury! Have since had RWD FLEETWOODS, RWD Fifth Avenues ,as well as 89 Lincoln Town Car Signature Series and current 2007 TOWN CAR Signature Limited! All great cars, but 77 through 79 was KING 🤴 of the road! So sad to see what is now considered a luxury vehicle 😢. Who wants to drive a glorified truck 🚚?
  • Kwik_Shift There are better cars to drop $80G on.
  • 28-Cars-Later Opulence!
  • Kwik_Shift If there is no 2WD Access Cab with 6 speed manual, then I'm not interested.
  • RedDevil Radio Garden is my go to for long trips.Thousands of radio stations all over the worldfor free as long as you have internet. Sure beats hunting for the one or two decent stations in most areas.