2019 Mercedes-AMG GT S Roadster: The 515-horsepower Middle Child

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The traditional birth order for children goes from oldest to youngest and biggest to smallest. But cars are a little different. If the market allows for it, you can slot in a middle child almost anywhere you like. Formerly a two-trimmed affair, the Mercedes-AMG GT Roadster is following the hardtop’s lead by expanding its ranks to include a middle-weight bruiser.

For the 2019 model year, AMG Roadsters will now come in a GT S trim. Better than the base unit, but not quite as impressive as its bigger brother, the formula for the mid-level trim is identical to the coupe variant that shares its name — just with an infinite amount of headroom.

The AMG GT and AMG GT C boast 469 horsepower and 465 lb-ft of torque, and 550 hp and 502 lb-ft, respectively. Slotting itself between them, the AMG GT S uses the same 4.0-liter biturbo V8 to produce 515 hp and 494 lb-ft. The combination is good for an 0-to-60 time of 3.7 seconds (estimated) and a top speed of 192 mph — splitting the difference between its siblings once more. That’s the predominant theme with the GT S. You’re getting more just about everywhere, but not so much to negate the GT C’s existence.

However, it’s closer than you might think. The GT S Roadster comes standard with AMG’s sports suspension with adaptive damping system, an electronically controlled limited slip on the rear axle, and variable performance exhaust — items which the base model lacks but come standard on the fancier GT C.

The two models also share multiple programable drive modes, including the “Race” setting that’s unavailable on the lower trim. But it lacks things like rear-wheel steering and has an interior with slightly less leather upholstery as standard. You can, of course, choose to upgrade.

An AMG high-performance composite brake system is obligatory. The front axle features composite discs measuring 15.4 x 1.42 inches, with six-piston fixed calipers, and 14.2 x 1.02 inch single-piston units at the rear. Mercedes will allow you to upgrade them to oversized high-performance ceramics, but we say pass unless you’re a track day junkie.

Standard wheels measure 19 inches up front and 20 in the back and come in a 10-spoke design. However, numerous designs are available for purchase. That might not be a bad investment either, because all three of the roadsters look practically identical. There are a handful of subtle tells, though.

Unlike the base model, the GT S comes with added chrome on the air inlet fins inside of the front bumper. There is also a little bit around the rear diffuser and front splitter. The red calipers are another giveaway. However, that doesn’t help much when trying to differentiate the mid-trim AMG from the GT C Roadster. All you can really do is hunt for more chrome around the lower portions of the bodywork.

Pricing hasn’t been announced yet but the 2019 Mercedes-AMG GT S Roadster has to be slotted in-between $124,400 and $157,000. We expect it to follow the coupe’s lead and be on the higher end of that spectrum, too.

[Images: Daimler AG]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 4 comments
  • Bobmaxed Bobmaxed on May 15, 2018

    I agree 100% with Compaq Deskpro UGLY!

  • RHD RHD on May 16, 2018

    It could be better looking, for sure. Mercedes should look at its past roadsters to see what classic proportions and lines are. This looks like Hyundai had a say in its styling. I would prefer driving this over any other Benz, though. You couldn't actually drive it comfortably, though, unless you had a very expensive comprehensive insurance policy. Is it 4 times better than a Miata? Um, no. It just seems to scream "The guy driving this car is making an outrageous lease payment!" Around my town cars like this are only driven by status-competitive East Indians, and maybe an unmarried dentist or two.

  • ToolGuy I could go for a Mustang with a Subaru powertrain. (Maybe some additional ground clearance.)
  • ToolGuy Does Tim Healey care about TTAC? 😉
  • ToolGuy I am slashing my food budget by 1%.
  • ToolGuy TG grows skeptical about his government protecting him from bad decisions.
  • Calrson Fan Jeff - Agree with what you said. I think currently an EV pick-up could work in a commercial/fleet application. As someone on this site stated, w/current tech. battery vehicles just do not scale well. EBFlex - No one wanted to hate the Cyber Truck more than me but I can't ignore all the new technology and innovative thinking that went into it. There is a lot I like about it. GM, Ford & Ram should incorporate some it's design cues into their ICE trucks.
Next