QOTD: What's Missing From Your Subaru Lineup?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Yesterday’s teaser of the upcoming 2019 Subaru Forester got me thinking, but not about the Forester. Don’t get me wrong, the Forester’s a good vehicle — a gold first-gen model driven by a buddy tackled moderately challenging terrain with aplomb whenever we’d head to the woods for some gunplay — but for many, it’s not the stuff dreams are made of.

No, I started thinking of the blank space in Subaru’s lineup — the missing models that could fill a niche here and there. If given control of the company’s development team, I know exactly what I’d plunk atop the company’s global platform, and maybe you do, too.

Prepare for a shock: It’s a pickup I want. Yes, we had a second swing at the beloved Brat with the short-lived Baja (2003-2006), essentially an Outback with a pickup bed large enough to hold your backpack, but that model didn’t leave the oven in pristine condition.

By taking the popular Outback, chopping the roof off the rear cargo hold, adding six inches of length, and throwing in a set of “sport bars” for rigidity and grab-handle use, Subaru created something of an ugly duckling. To keep rear seat volume in Outback territory, the roofline remained very upright, ending abruptly when it reached the bed. Hardly the graceful transition seen on the Brat. The bed itself, though capable of being extended, was too short. It was too much car, too little pickup.

Subaru had better things to spend its time on.

With the introduction of the 2019 Ascent, the Subaru Global Platform now host vehicles ranging from compact sedan to midsize, three-row SUV. While I highly doubt Subaru will attempt a third unibody, AWD sport pickup, there’s no model I’d like to see more. If it can built the long-wheelbase Ascent on the SGP architecture, a pickup should be a breeze. Ditch the four conventional doors that just eat up too much real estate and swap them for a clamshell configuration. I don’t care if the rear seat isn’t F-150-sized. As long as it’s accessible for the few times you’ll actually have a passenger back there.

Bring back the Brat’s flying buttress look for the C-pillar and give the rear glass a forward rake. Add enough length out back to avoid stubbiness. Ground clearance needn’t be more than the Subie-standard 8.7 inches. Keep the strong 2.4-liter flat-four turbo from the Ascent. Toss in a mild application of butch cladding and ensure it goes into production in Indiana, thus side-stepping the chicken tax. Bam.

Yes, such a vehicle would make your author mighty pleased, though perhaps you’ve got a better idea in mind. If Subaru hauled you to HQ and said “You’re calling the shots, do whatever makes you happy,” what would be your pick for a new model?

[Image: Subaru]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 105 comments
  • Ubermensch Ubermensch on Mar 16, 2018

    Turbo wagons/hatchbacks is the obvious answer. Killing off the WRX hatch was incredibly dumb. Why can't the Crosstrek/Impreza get the 2.0 turbo? I would buy a Crosstrek with a turbo and a manual TODAY.

  • 902Chris 902Chris on Mar 16, 2018

    Let's get crazy for a minute - Let's phone up Subaru of Indiana Automotive Inc (formerly Subaru-Isuzu Automotive Inc - see where I'm going with this). It's time to build the spiritual successor for the Izuzu Amigo that they used to build. Only it will be a Subaru design so it's not a death trap. More like the spiritual successor to the Subaru Brat, only less ute and more convertible SUV. We are going to take the Crosstrek and cut the back roof off to add a removable fiberglass top (like the Amigo or Gen 1 Toyota 4Runner). Factory-add: Method MR502 15" rims (or styled steel 15" for the base trim) BFG ALL-TERRAIN T/A KO2 215/75R15 tires. Call FCA. Tell them to put the Wrangler on notice. Call the bank. Tell them they need to make some room.

  • Theflyersfan OK, I'm going to stretch the words "positive change" to the breaking point here, but there might be some positive change going on with the beaver grille here. This picture was at Car and Driver. You'll notice that the grille now dives into a larger lower air intake instead of really standing out in a sea of plastic. In darker colors like this blue, it somewhat conceals the absolute obscene amount of real estate this unneeded monstrosity of a failed styling attempt takes up. The Euro front plate might be hiding some sins as well. You be the judge.
  • Theflyersfan I know given the body style they'll sell dozens, but for those of us who grew up wanting a nice Prelude Si with 4WS but our student budgets said no way, it'd be interesting to see if Honda can persuade GenX-ers to open their wallets for one. Civic Type-R powertrain in a coupe body style? Mild hybrid if they have to? The holy grail will still be if Honda gives the ultimate middle finger towards all things EV and hybrid, hides a few engineers in the basement away from spy cameras and leaks, comes up with a limited run of 9,000 rpm engines and gives us the last gasp of the S2000 once again. A send off to remind us of when once they screamed before everything sounds like a whirring appliance.
  • Jeff Nice concept car. One can only dream.
  • Funky D The problem is not exclusively the cost of the vehicle. The problem is that there are too few use cases for BEVs that couldn't be done by a plug-in hybrid, with the latter having the ability to do long-range trips without requiring lengthy recharging and being better able to function in really cold climates.In our particular case, a plug-in hybrid would run in all electric mode for the vast majority of the miles we would drive on a regular basis. It would also charge faster and the battery replacement should be less expensive than its BEV counterpart.So the answer for me is a polite, but firm NO.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic 2012 Ford Escape V6 FWD at 147k miles:Just went thru a heavy maintenance cycle: full brake job with rotors and drums, replace top & bottom radiator hoses, radiator flush, transmission flush, replace valve cover gaskets (still leaks oil, but not as bad as before), & fan belt. Also, #4 fuel injector locked up. About $4.5k spread over 19 months. Sole means of transportation, so don't mind spending the money for reliability. Was going to replace prior to the above maintenance cycle, but COVID screwed up the market ( $4k markup over sticker including $400 for nitrogen in the tires), so bit the bullet. Now serious about replacing, but waiting for used and/or new car prices to fall a bit more. Have my eye on a particular SUV. Last I checked, had a $2.5k discount with great interest rate (better than my CU) for financing. Will keep on driving Escape as long as A/C works. 🚗🚗🚗
Next