Japanese Automakers: Trump's Steel Tariff Will Cost You More at the Dealership
Earlier this month, President Trump signed an executive order imposing a 25 percent tariff on foreign steel and a 10 percent tariff on foreign aluminum. Hoping to receive an exception, the Japanese auto lobby warned that the U.S. import tax would definitely inflate the price of models built by the companies it represents. That’s bad news.
However, the White House has already omitted its NAFTA partners from the tariffs, adding that it would consider further exceptions based on countries’ contributions to U.S. national security, military alliances, trading history, and how much they pay into strategic alliances like NATO.
While Japan is a longtime trading partner with the U.S., there currently exists a $69 billion deficit between the two countries. Trump also bemoaned Japan’s unwillingness to accept American imports. Still, the two have shared military alliances throughout the 20th century, with one ugly exception during World War II. They currently operate under the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security and the U.S. currently considers the Japan one of its closest allies, despite it not being a NATO member — placing it in reasonably positive standing for tariff exceptions.
On Thursday, the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association (JAMA) said it is anticipating what kind of exemptions might be made for U.S. trading partners beyond Canada and Mexico. Obviously, it hopes to be considered. While Trump’s strategy may be aimed at China, which accounts for almost half of the world’s steel production, Japan is the second highest steel exporter by volume and would be hit hard by the import fees.
According to Automotive News, JAMA Chair and CEO of Nissan Motor Co. Hiroto Saikawa said U.S. tariffs would likely drive up auto prices across the board. “If there is going to be a tariff levied, then everyone will have to raise their prices,” Saikawa said in a recent press conference. “I don’t think this will have any good impact.”
Trump’s initiative drew praise from domestic steel executives and union leaders, but the general mood in Washington is one of concern. Democrats are likely to oppose the president at every turn, and many Republicans have openly voiced their opposition to the tariffs, too. House Speaker Paul Ryan said he understood China’s steel dumping was a serious problem, and certainly unfair to other countries, while urging the president to exercise caution.
“I think the smarter way to go is to make it more surgical and more targeted,” he said.
Ryan said a blanket approach could have “unintended consequences.” As of now, those consequences have not yet fully manifested. Saikawa did not bother to estimate how much Japanese car prices might rise and noted that the country’s automakers try to source steel locally whenever possible. That could help suppress the price bloat, though there’s no way of knowing by how much until more time has passed.
“We do not see the full picture,” Saikawa said. “We have to wait and see.”
John Horner on Mar 17, 2018
Tarrifs on imported steel but not imported cars makes it all the more likely cars will be made outside the US. It would be cheaper for Honda to build an Accord in China with Chinese sourced steel than it would be to make the same car in Ohio. Don't bother to argue that Honda wouldn't be able to assemble as good of a car in China as it does in Ohio.
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Laszlo I own a 1969 falcon futura 4 door hardtop, original inline 6 and c4 transmission and it still runs to this day.
- BklynPete So let's get this straight: Ford hyped up the Bronco for 3 years, yet couldn't launch it to match the crazy initial demand. They released it with numerous QC issues, made hay for its greedy dealers, and burned customers in the process. After all that, they lose money on warranties. The vehicles turn out to be a worse ownership experience than the Jeep Wrangler, which hasn't been a paragon of reliability for 50 years. The same was true of the Aviator, Explorer, several F-150 variants, and other recent product launches. The Maverick is the only thing they got right. Yet this company that's been at it for 120 years. Just Brilliant. Jim Farley's non-PR speak: "You don't get to call me an idiot. I get to call myself an idiot first."Farley truly seems hapless, like the characters his late cousin played. Bill Ford is a nice guy but more than a bit slow on the uptake too. They have not had anything resembling a quality CEO since Alan Mulally turned the keys over to Mark Fields - the mulleted glamor boy who got canned after 3 years when the PowerShi(f)t transaxles exploded. He more recently helped run Hertz into the ground with bad QC and a faulty database that had them arresting customers. Ford is starting to resemble Chrysler in the mid-Seventies Sales Bank era. Well, at least VW has cash and envies Ford's distribution reach and potential profitability.
- Mike Beranek This guy called and wants his business model back.
- SCE to AUX The solid state battery is vaporware.As for software-limited pack capacity: Batteries are obviously the most expensive component of an EV, so on the rare occasion that pack capacity is dramatically limited (as in your 6-year-old example), it's because economies of scale briefly made sense at the time.Mfrs are not in the habit of overbuilding pack capacity just for fun, and then charging the customer less.Since then, pack capacities have been slightly increased via software because the mfr decides they can sacrifice a little bit of the normal safety/wear margin in the interest of range. We're talking single-digit percentages, not the 60/75 kWh jump in your example.Every pack has maybe 10% margin built into it, so eating into that today (via range increases) means it's not available to make up for battery degradation tomorrow. My 4-year-old EV still has its original range(s) and 100% SOH, but that's surely because it is slowly consuming the margin built into the pack.@Matt Posky: Not everything is a conspiracy to get your credit card account, and the lengthy editorial about this has nothing to do with solid state batteries.
- JLGOLDEN In order for this total newcomer to grab and hold attention in the US market, the products MUST be an exceptional value. Not many people will pay name-brand money for the pretty mystery. I can appreciate the ambition of selling $50K+ crossovers, but I think they will go farther with their $30K-$40K offerings.