Joint Toyota-Mazda Assembly Plant Headed to Alabama: Report

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It looks like Alabama has won out over North Carolina in the battle to secure a massive, $1.6 billion joint assembly plant. The factory, a partnership between Toyota and Mazda (which, as of last summer, Toyota owns a 5 percent stake in), is reportedly headed to Huntsville, Alabama, and should give the smaller automaker the American capacity it needs to boost crossover sales.

Sources tell Reuters that company officials and government representatives will make an announcement today at the future factory site. Not only does the new plant herald lots of new jobs, it also means a new model.

The Alabama site makes sense for both automakers, as Toyota already has an engine plant in the area, and the Deep South locale keeps both companies relatively safe from UAW organization. A union attempt to break into the Southern auto workforce at Nissan’s Mississippi plant last year met with defeat.

The plant, said to be located at the Huntsville Mega Site, would bring 4,000 jobs to the region, with output reaching some 300,000 vehicles per year. It’s capacity both companies need. Toyota plans to shift Corolla production from Ontario to Alabama, rather than overburden its planned (but pared back) Guanajuato, Mexico plant. The automaker’s south-of-the-border facilities will instead crank out extra Tacomas — a vehicle Americans can’t seem to get enough of.

For Mazda, the automaker’s first U.S. plant means a wholly new model targeted specifically at American buyers. Sales haven’t reached a target laid out by CEO Masamichi Kogai in 2013, and production constraints, coupled with a limited crossover lineup, plays a large role in that. (U.S. Mazda sales reached a high point in 2015, falling each year since.) Last year, Kogai said the new plant would build a new crossover, with introduction set for 2021.

We don’t know much about Mazda’s new mystery vehicle, only that it’s tailored for U.S. buyers and will supposedly to fit into the brand’s lineup without cannibalizing sales of the CX-3, CX-5, and CX-9. The automaker certainly expects to sell a lot of them. Once up and running, Mazda plans to devote all of its 150,000-vehicle capacity at the plant to this new crossover — at least at first.

[Image: Mazda]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 37 comments
  • Sgeffe Sgeffe on Jan 10, 2018

    I’d say that the state of Alabama is off to a rousing start in 2018! First a national championship, now this!

    • JimC2 JimC2 on Jan 10, 2018

      Don't forget a special election (tee tee!!)

  • Mzr Mzr on Jan 10, 2018

    Don't do this Mazda. Toyota is a vampire, look at what happened to Subaru when they partnered with Toyota. Boring, boring, boring.

  • EBFlex Garbage but for less!
  • FreedMike I actually had a deal in place for a PHEV - a Mazda CX-90 - but it turned out to be too big to fit comfortably in my garage, thus making too difficult to charge, so I passed. But from that, I learned the Truth About PHEVs - they're a VERY niche product, and probably always be, because their use case is rather nebulous. Yes, you can run on EV power for 25-30 miles, plug it in at home on a slow charger, and the next day, you're ready to go again. Great in theory, but in practice, a) you still need a home charger, b) you paid a LOT more for the car than you would have for a standard hybrid, and c) you discover the nasty secret of PHEVs, which is that when they're on battery power, they're absolute pigs to drive. Meanwhile, to maintain its' piglike battery-only performance, it still needs to be charged, so you're running into all the (overstated) challenges that BEV owners have, with none of the performance that BEV owners like. To quote King George in "Hamilton": " Awesome. Wow." In the Mazda's case, the PHEV tech was used as a performance enhancer - which worked VERY nicely - but it's the only performance-oriented PHEV out there that doesn't have a Mercedes-level pricetag. So who's the ideal owner here? Far as I can tell, it's someone who doesn't mind doing his 25 mile daily commute in a car that's slow as f*ck, but also wants to take the car on long road trips that would be inconvenient in a BEV. Meanwhile, the MPG Uber Alles buyers are VERY cost conscious - thus the MPG Uber Alles thing - and won't be enthusiastic about spending thousands more to get similar mileage to a standard hybrid. That's why the Volt failed. The tech is great for a narrow slice of buyers, but I think the real star of the PHEV revival show is the same tax credits that many BEVs get.
  • RHD The speed limit was raised from 62.1 MPH to 68.3 MPH. It's a slight difference which will, more than anything, lower the fines for the guy caught going 140 KPH.
  • Msquare The argument for unlimited autobahns has historically been that lane discipline is a life-or-death thing instead of a suggestion. That and marketing cars designed for autobahn speeds gives German automakers an advantage even in places where you can't hope to reach such speeds. Not just because of enforcement, but because of road conditions. An old Honda commercial voiced by Burgess Meredith had an Accord going 110 mph. Burgess said, "At 110 miles per hour, we have found the Accord to be quiet and comfortable. At half that speed, you may find it to be twice as quiet and comfortable." That has sold Mercedes, BMW's and even Volkswagens for decades. The Green Party has been pushing for decades for a 100 km/h blanket limit for environmental reasons, with zero success.
  • Varezhka The upcoming mild-hybrid version (aka 500 Ibrida) can't come soon enough. Since the new 500e is based on the old Alfa Mito and Opel Adam platform (now renamed STLA City) you'd have thought they've developed the gas version together.
Next