Idiots Need to Understand That Self-driving Cars Aren't Here Yet

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
idiots need to understand that self driving cars arent here yet

With automakers, the Department of Transportation, NHTSA, and Congress all attempting to get self-driving vehicles onto the road as quickly as possible, the autonomous revolution finds itself in a sticky situation. Some motorists are confusing their semi-autonomous technology with an impenetrable safety net. This has resulted in avoidable accidents as drivers assume their high-tech cars can cope with whatever’s thrown at them, and it’s probably going to get worse as more idiots buy them.

We’ve already covered how semi-autonomous features make everyone less-effective behind the wheel and the fatal Tesla Autopilot crash was a story we kept up with for over a year. Investigators ruled that accident was the perfect storm of mishaps, however, there remains a common thread between the two pieces. The driver may have been spared were he not so eager to put his faith into the vehicle’s semi-autonomous system.

On Monday, a Tesla Model S collided with stopped firetruck that was responding to an accident on a freeway in Culver City, California. As you already guessed, the driver told the firefighters that the vehicle was operating in Autopilot mode. While nobody was injured in the crash, it’s another stroke in the ugly portrait of people placing blind trust in a technology they don’t understand. And, boy oh boy, are we just getting started on illustrating this problem.

Over the weekend, a drunk driver who passed out while behind the wheel of his Tesla attempted to assure police everything was fine because the vehicle was “on Autopilot.” According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the man was attempting to cross the Bay Bridge and blacked out in traffic. Presumably, Autopilot responded as it was supposed to in this instance and stopped the car when the vehicle realized the driver had stopped interacting with it. But it doesn’t change the fact that morons continue to think semi-autonomous vehicles can do all the work themselves.

In fact, after searching the web for a grand total of 30 seconds, we found a video where a Model X owner calls Autopilot 2 “ basically full autonomous.” The title of the video even calls the car a “Full Self Driving Model X.” The footage is random collection of hand-held shots of his 1,000-mile road trip while he fails to engage with the vehicle in a safe manner. Since the company got lambasted by Consumer Reports last year, Tesla Motors has been pretty clear that drivers aren’t supposed to take their hands off the wheel and now disables Autopilot if a driver fails to do so after the system makes that request.

Great, except the driver in the aforementioned video found away around that. By securing a bottle of water to the steering wheel, he managed to trick the vehicle’s sensors into thinking he’s still holding onto it — allowing for a hands-free experience. There are a lot of videos like this on YouTube. One, in which a man uses an orange to defeat Tesla’s hands-on safety measure, has over 2.5 million views. [Update: this video has since been removed from the internet]

This cornucopia of stupidity is by no means exclusive to Tesla owners. Plenty of automakers have semi-autonomous systems now. Nissan has ProPliot Assist, Cadillac has Super Cruise, BMW has Traffic Jam Assistant, Audi has Traffic Jam Pilot, Mercedes-Benz has Drive Pilot, and Volvo has Pilot Assist. While the systems all function differently, every single one of them can be confused with full autonomy — even though none of them are.

That’s not to insult the various systems. They are all technological marvels (I’m told) and the first time you use them, you’ll walk away impressed. However, the honeymoon phase quickly evolves into complacency. Then the system suddenly fails and and an accident happens.

While it’s easy to blame automakers for marketing these systems as more comprehensive than they actually are, many are very clear about exactly what the technology can do, and all include some kind of safety measure to ensure drivers don’t check out entirely. But that won’t keep a certain percentage of the population from thinking they’ve just purchased a self-driving car.

Honestly, it’s probably better that these types of drivers have advanced safety systems in place to save them from their own stupidity. There’s plenty of research to back up the usefulness of semi-autonomous aids. However, that doesn’t mean automakers shouldn’t go the extra mile to make absolutely certain customers have a complete understanding of the technology, lest they do something foolish to nullify the safety net they paid extra for.

[Image: Culver City Firefighters Local 1927]

Join the conversation
2 of 78 comments
  • Doublechili Doublechili on Jan 26, 2018

    Considering some of the drivers out there on the roads, I think I might take my chances with the orange....

  • Tandoor Tandoor on Jan 26, 2018

    When you make something safer, people increase their risk taking back up to the same level they were comfortable with before. You see people drive cars with none of these systems while looking at their phones. Now some cars have systems that allow them to completely ignore the road in relative safety. No surprise they are unprepared for when the system can’t handle the situation.

  • NotMyCircusNotMyMonkeys hornet is an alfa with $15k on the hood from the factory in italy
  • Tassos This "Eldorado" is a sad caricature of the far more substantial Eldorado and esp "Biarritz"s of the late 50s and 60s.It belongs to the junkyard. I can see no reason why anybody would want to restore this loser.Instead, you can get a FLAGSHIP German Luxury Sedan from the Web auctions, such as this one that was just sold for a tiny fraction of its price new, and which is still eminently driveable with little or no improvements:
  • Cprescott Yet Honduh can't even build a car with safe seatbelts.
  • Analoggrotto " If we look into who was leading in overall recalls for 2022, Ford had the most – followed by Volkswagen, Stellantis, Mercedes-Benz, and General Motors. Though Kia and Hyundai followed immediately after."Such great company to be within.
  • FreedMike Here's my question: Why, Dodge, did you wait 10+ years to introduce a vehicle like the Hornet - a compact CUV with some performance chops and "Dodge attitude"? I'm not crazy about the Hornet itself, but the concept itself is great, and if they'd done something like it - and at a lower price point - in 2012, they wouldn't be staring at the business abyss they are now. They might have even generated enough profit to keep the Challenger and Charger refreshed and up-to-date, as Ford did with the Mustang - which is sticking around, unlike the Dodge muscle cars.