Fiat Chrysler to Bring Heavy Duty Pickup Production Back to U.S., Shower Workers With Cash

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

There’s good news this morning for Fiat Chrysler worker in the United States, and it’s also good news for members of the Trump administration.

The automaker has announced plans to sink another $1 billion into its Warren Truck Assembly plant and bring production of its Ram Heavy Duty models to Michigan from Saltillo, Mexico. At the same time, some 60,000 hourly and salaried workers in the U.S. can expect a $2,000 bonus (paid in the second quarter of 2018) in recognition of “their continued efforts towards the success of the company.” The move also means 2,500 previously unannounced jobs for Michigan.

What’s behind all of this sudden goodwill? Recent changes to the country’s tax landscape, FCA claims.

“It is only proper that our employees share in the savings generated by tax reform and that we openly acknowledge the resulting improvement in the U.S. business environment by investing in our industrial footprint accordingly,” said CEO Sergio Marchionne in a statement.

So, how does this production shuffle play out, and what’s the backstory here?

In late 2016, FCA delayed a planned revamp of its HD truck models, leaving Saltillo in charge of building older models while the automaker retooled its Sterling Heights plant (at a cost of $1.5 billion) for the next-generation Ram 1500. The old 1500, produced at Warren and Saltillo, will soldier on in dwindling numbers for a couple of years. HD and chassis cab models have hailed from Mexico since the late 2000s.

The HD switcheroo comes in 2020, with the delayed next-gen model setting up shop in Warren. Slated for production alongside the trucks is a reborn Jeep Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer. The retooling needed for those SUVs, announced a year ago, carries a $1 billion price tag (part of which covers costs for the Jeep Scrambler pickup, bound for Toledo). Meanwhile, Saltillo will be “repurposed to produce future commercial vehicles for global distribution.”

There’s no word on what form those vehicles will take.

Worker bonuses and tax changes aside, a glance at the company’s timeline of decisions suggests HD production was bound for the U.S., anyway. It fits with a trend among Detroit Three automakers — increasingly, we’ve seen high-margin vehicle production come stateside while lower-profit models are offloaded to other jurisdictions.

The announcement of the Ram HD’s redesign delay came in early December 2016, shortly after the election of a president determined to scrap or rewrite the North American Free Trade Agreement. The possibility of import tariffs remains a real concern. In its January 2017 funding announcement, FCA said Warren Truck would “have the flexibility to also produce the Ram heavy duty truck.”

It certainly appears as if FCA’s seeking to insulate itself from any surprises. Regardless, the move of HD trucks to Warren — still subject to negotiation and final approval of state and local incentives — is undoubtedly good news for American workers.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 92 comments
  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Jan 13, 2018

    This is good news. Correct me if I'm wrong but I do recall FCA discussing the possibility of moving some Ram production back to the US. Also, what deals have been cut behind the scenes with the State/county/city? If all is good in the US now and pickup manufacture is very competitive, start winding back the Chicken Tax. MAGA is all about "fair" competition, isn't it?

  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Jan 13, 2018

    This is good news. Correct me if I'm wrong but I do recall FCA discussing the possibility of moving some Ram production back to the US. Also, what deals have been cut behind the scenes with the State/county/city? If all is good in the US now and pickup manufacture is very competitive, start winding back the Chicken Tax. MAGA is all about "fair" competition, isn't it?

  • Lou_BC I read an interesting post by a master engine builder. He's having a hard time finding quality parts anywhere. The other issue is most young men don't want to learn the engine building trade. He's got so much work that he will now only work on engines his shop is restoring.
  • Tim Myers Can you tell me why in the world Mazda uses the ugliest colors on the MX5? I have a 2017 in Red and besides Black or White, the other colors are horrible for a sports car. I constantly hear this complaint. I wish someone would tell whoever makes theses decisions that they need a more sports car colors available. They’d probably sell a lot more of them. Just saying.
  • Dartman EBFlex will soon be able to buy his preferred brand!
  • Mebgardner I owned 4 different Z cars beginning with a 1970 model. I could already row'em before buying the first one. They were light, fast, well powered, RWD, good suspenders, and I loved working on them myself when needed. Affordable and great styling, too. On the flip side, parts were expensive and mostly only available in a dealers parts dept. I could live with those same attributes today, but those days are gone long gone. Safety Regulations and Import Regulations, while good things, will not allow for these car attributes at the price point I bought them at.I think I will go shop a GT-R.
  • Lou_BC Honda plans on investing 15 billion CAD. It appears that the Ontario government and Federal government will provide tax breaks and infrastructure upgrades to the tune of 5 billion CAD. This will cover all manufacturing including a battery plant. Honda feels they'll save 20% on production costs having it all localized and in house.As @ Analoggrotto pointed out, another brilliant TTAC press release.
Next