Waiting for a Turbo Jeep Wrangler With Insane Horsepower? No so Fast…

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Last week brought quite a flurry of excitement for eager Jeep Wrangler aficionados. The long-awaited next-generation JL model has steadily revealed its secrets in dribs and drabs, but last week’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration filing appeared to reveal one of the biggest nuggets to date — a horsepower figure for the model’s 2.0-liter turbocharged “Hurricane” four-cylinder.

368 horsepower. Even from a unit expected to arrive with power in the neighborhood of 300 hp, this figure came as a shock. 368 hp isn’t “in the neighborhood” — it’s eight blocks over, past the train tracks, and in a better part of town.

Well, to all of you anticipating a real screamer of a Jeep, it’s time to hold your breath once again. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles has updated its NHTSA filing.

Drumroll please. According to the new filing, the 2.0-liter four-banger in uplevel 2018 Wranglers is… not rated. That’s right. The rest of the information on the data sheet stays the same — the 3.6-liter Pentastar V6 soldiers on in the JL and older JK Wrangler with 285 hp, the diesel options remains absent for now — but the Hurricane is now downgraded to a tropical disturbance of unknown ferocity.

It’s quite possible FCA simply inputted the wrong number by mistake. Speaking to Road & Track, an FCA source recently claimed the 368 figure is “dead wrong.”

Certainly, 368 hp from two liters of displacement doesn’t ring true for a brand like Jeep. Such an engine would out-muscle all but the hottest European four-cylinders. Still, the document was an official NHTSA filing.

If the original rumors bears out, JL Wrangler buyers won’t have to worry about a lack of propulsive force. 300 hp, or thereabouts, and an unknown torque figure will surely give the Wrangler enough in the giddy-up department, as well as providing it with an EPA-placating fuel economy rating. We know already that 2.0-liter buyers won’t have a choice of transmission besides an eight-speed automatic.

Pentastar-powered Wranglers, in two-door and Unlimited guise, will still be available with a six-speed manual.

[Images: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, NHTSA]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Oct 12, 2017

    Why do they have to file that information with the NHTSA, anyway? Is it for crash testing purposes?

  • Weskyvet Weskyvet on Oct 14, 2017

    As the proud owner of a pre pentastar 2.5 I-4 (1995 model year to be exact) I can attest that the I-4 NEEDS more power. 75 mph is possible on the highway but it's about all the lil Wrangler wants. now something closer to an old chevy 5.0 (302, 305, 307) in power and torque numbers would be amazing especially with the Wrangler getting a little fat. Now I just have to wait to see one in the junkyard so I can steal err... acquire said turbo 4 and figure out how to mate it to an AX15 mwahahahahaha!!!

  • Zipper69 "At least Lincoln finally learned to do a better job of not appearing to have raided the Ford parts bin"But they differentiate by being bland and unadventurous and lacking a clear brand image.
  • Zipper69 "The worry is that vehicles could collect and share Americans' data with the Chinese government"Presumably, via your cellphone connection? Does the average Joe in the gig economy really have "data" that will change the balance of power?
  • Zipper69 Honda seem to have a comprehensive range of sedans that sell well.
  • Oberkanone How long do I have to stay in this job before I get a golden parachute?I'd lower the price of the V-Series models. Improve the quality of interiors across the entire line. I'd add a sedan larger then CT5. I'd require a financial review of Celestiq. If it's not a profit center it's gone. Styling updates in the vision of the XLR to existing models. 2+2 sports coupe woutd be added. Performance in the class of AMG GT and Porsche 911 at a price just under $100k. EV models would NOT be subsidized by ICE revenue.
  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
Next