Jaguar Isn't Giving Up on Sports Cars, But Don't Expect the Purity to Last

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Think of the words “Jaguar” and “sports car” and the mind instantly conjures up images of the flowing XK120 and E-Type roadsters of yesteryear, each sporting a properly British straight-six engine under a kilometer-long hood. Okay, okay — the final E-Type variant doubled the cylinder count, but you get the idea.

The tradition of open-top two-seaters continues to this day with the F-Type, albeit with a much more diverse array of engine offerings. As the tech press talks up a future of autonomous people pods, and as crossovers threaten to overwhelm every longstanding brand, Jaguar wants automotive puritans to fear not: the Jaguar sports car isn’t going anywhere.

But that doesn’t mean it won’t change with the times.

Speaking at an event in Detroit last week, Jaguar design boss Ian Callum told Automotive News that the F-Type won’t be the last of the brand’s two-door sports car lineage. It’s just the latest.

“We are going to do another range of sports cars eventually,” said Callum. “[Sports cars] are not going to go away.”

Journos hailed the F-Type’s debut in early 2013 as a return to form for the brand, with the model coming on the heels — and borrowing a modified platform — of the four-seat XK series. Available in droptop and coupe variants, the F-Type offers powerplants ranging from fast enough to wild.

Still, great looks and thrilling handling dynamics aren’t a surefire indicator of sales. The F-Type, along with all other passenger cars, sport or otherwise, faces an existential threat from utility vehicles, driverless technology, and environmental regulators. There’s also healthy competition from within the segment. As well, some would-be buyers might see more practicality in a hotter F-Pace SUV.

“SUVs can get around a corner as quick as a sports car can, technology being what it is,” said Callum. “But there is something very emotional about a sports car that conveys the ultimate in the sense of performance and design.”

Hoping to sweeten the pot, Jaguar dropped a 296-horsepower turbocharged four into the base F-Type for 2018, allowing for a pre-delivery MSRP below the $60,000 threshold. Buyers can still opt for a supercharged V6 or V8, with 575 hp on tap for those willing to drop $122,000. However, after a healthy start to the year, the last two months have seen year-over-year U.S. sales drops, with July being the lowest showing since April of 2014. The 2015 model year was the F-Type’s best, with 4,629 units sold.

As there’s no successor in sight, Jaguar will do what it can to keep the F-Type fresh. Callum won’t say when we’ll see a new sports model, though Jaguar Land Rover’s North American CEO, Joe Eberhardt, confirmed to AN that the successor won’t rely solely on gasoline for propulsion. As the automaker switches to electrified powertrains starting in 2020, any sports car will share the same mold.

[Image: Jaguar Land Rover]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • Stingray65 Stingray65 on Sep 25, 2017

    4,000 to 5,000 US sales annually isn't bad, because I expect Jaguar sells at least that many again in other markets around the world. In comparison, global sales of the E-Type was just over 70,000 units over 14 years, or about 5,000 annually, but probably 80% of those went to the US.

  • Sitting@home Sitting@home on Sep 25, 2017

    "straight-six engine under a kilometer-long hood" That would be a mile-long bonnet dear chap. We'll have none of this garlic chomping measurement system or ex-colony language phrases used to describe our beautiful ladies :-)

  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. 😉
  • Carson D I'd go with the RAV4. It will last forever, and someone will pay you for it if you ever lose your survival instincts.
  • THX1136 A less expensive EV would make it more attractive. For the record, I've never purchased a brand new vehicle as I have never been able to afford anything but used. I think the same would apply to an EV. I also tend to keep a vehicle way longer than most folks do - 10+ years. If there was a more affordable one right now then other things come to bear. There are currently no chargers in my immediate area (town of 16K). I don't know if I can afford to install the necessary electrical service to put one in my car port right now either. Other than all that, I would want to buy what I like from a cosmetic standpoint. That would be a Charger EV which, right now, doesn't exist and I couldn't afford anyway. I would not buy an EV just to be buying an EV. Nothing against them either. Most of my constraints are purely financial being 71 with a disabled wife and on a fixed income.
  • ToolGuy Two more thoughts, ok three:a) Will this affordable EV have expressive C/D pillars, detailing on the rocker panels and many many things happening around the headlamps? Asking for a friend.b) Will this affordable EV have interior soft touch plastics and materials lifted directly from a European luxury sedan? Because if it does not, the automotive journalists are going to mention it and that will definitely spoil my purchase decision.c) Whatever the nominal range is, I need it to be 2 miles more, otherwise no deal. (+2 rule is iterative)
  • Zerofoo No.My wife has worked from home for a decade and I have worked from home post-covid. My commute is a drive back and forth to the airport a few times a year. My every-day predictable commute has gone away and so has my need for a charge at home commuter car.During my most recent trip I rented a PHEV. Avis didn't bother to charge it, and my newly renovated hotel does not have chargers on the property. I'm not sure why rental fleet buyers buy plug-in vehicles.Charging infrastructure is a chicken and egg problem that will not be solved any time soon.
Next