Take It or Leaf It: Nissan is Selling Its Battery Building Business to the Chinese
Earlier this month, Nissan announced it was in the final stages of sealing a deal to sell its entire EV battery business to Chinese investment firm GSR Capital. The sale includes battery plants in Tennessee, England, and Japan, with a preamble where the Japanese automaker has to buy up minority shares of Automotive Energy Supply Corp. from NEC Corp.
From there, it can sell off the business to GSR for a cool $1 billion — which isn’t a bad deal for the Chinese company. Nissan used around $1.4 billion in government funds building its U.S. factory in 2010, and the remaining plants weren’t exactly cheap to build. So why is Nissan selling them off?
For starters, the Leaf hasn’t been the sales leader the manufacturer hoped for. Even though global deliveries surpassed the 250,000-unit milestone in December 2016, Leaf sales don’t go beyond 50,000 units annually. By electric vehicle metrics, that’s still a win. However, the Tennessee factory is capable of producing 200,000 complete EV battery packs a year — well beyond the company’s current needs.
Reports point to the next-generation Leaf coming equipped with a less competitive power source and a more competitive price tag. Industry rumors have the 2018 model possessing a range of 143 miles per charge. That’s well below the 215-mile range of the Tesla Model 3 and the 238-mile range of the Chevrolet Bolt, both of which compete in the same segment as the Leaf.
Nissan hasn’t revealed its marketing plan for the new EV, but it’s assumed the car will come with several battery options and a base price $5,000 lower than the Bolt’s. Higher trim levels may even bridge the range gap. But, even with moderate sales, Nissan still needs to acquire its batteries from somewhere. In fact, its Tennessee assembly plant exists side-by-side with its EV battery factory and is part of the deal with GSR.
It’s difficult to see how this benefits the Japanese automaker. While GSR gets to become an important battery supplier for Chinese customers, Nissan gets to purchase its own hardware after having sold off the factories.
“This will enable GSR to grow its business and look for other opportunities,” Nissan North America spokesman Brian Brockman told Automotive News. “It will give them the scale to further develop their batteries and look for other opportunities.”
While altruism is its own reward, there isn’t usually a lot of money in it. But, by handing the battery business off, Nissan has alleviated some of the financial risks associated with production and engineering. It may have bit off more than it could chew and didn’t want to hold onto a side business it wasn’t taking full advantage of.
“The battery business alone will not make money, you have to have scale, you have to have the supply chain,” said GSR chairman Sonny Wu. “It’s a bloody, cutthroat game. The auto OEMs will lock you in for five years.”
Nissan has been selling stakes in other businesses, including parts supplier Calsonic Kansei and forklift manufacturer UniCarriers, to better focus on developing superior electric powertrains and autonomous driving technology. Nissan is also looking to push into Southeast Asia with smaller, more traditional automobiles since its purchase of a controlling stake in Mitsubishi Motors.
Under GSR ownership, the battery company will continue as the exclusive supplier of the Leaf’s power source.
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- ToolGuy CXXVIII comments?!?
- ToolGuy I did truck things with my truck this past week, twenty-odd miles from home (farther than usual). Recall that the interior bed space of my (modified) truck is 98" x 74". On the ride home yesterday the bed carried a 20 foot extension ladder (10 feet long, flagged 14 inches past the rear bumper), two other ladders, a smallish air compressor, a largish shop vac, three large bins, some materials, some scrap, and a slew of tool cases/bags. It was pretty full, is what I'm saying.The range of the Cybertruck would have been just fine. Nothing I carried had any substantial weight to it, in truck terms. The frunk would have been extremely useful (lock the tool cases there, out of the way of the Bed Stuff, away from prying eyes and grasping fingers -- you say I can charge my cordless tools there? bonus). Stainless steel plus no paint is a plus.Apparently the Cybertruck bed will be 78" long (but over 96" with the tailgate folded down) and 60-65" wide. And then Tesla promises "100 cubic feet of exterior, lockable storage — including the under-bed, frunk and sail pillars." Underbed storage requires the bed to be clear of other stuff, but bottom line everything would have fit, especially when we consider the second row of seats (tools and some materials out of the weather).Some days I was hauling mostly air on one leg of the trip. There were several store runs involved, some for 8-foot stock. One day I bummed a ride in a Roush Mustang. Three separate times other drivers tried to run into my truck (stainless steel panels, yes please). The fuel savings would be large enough for me to notice and to care.TL;DR: This truck would work for me, as a truck. Sample size = 1.
- Art Vandelay Dodge should bring this back. They could sell it as the classic classic classic model
- Surferjoe Still have a 2013 RDX, naturally aspirated V6, just can't get behind a 4 banger turbo.Also gloriously absent, ESS, lane departure warnings, etc.
- ToolGuy Is it a genuine Top Hand? Oh, I forgot, I don't care. 🙂
Why couldn't Nissan start up its hybrid unit? Many auto makers are still making hybrids. Toyota is still selling hybrid vehicles in many of its model including its Lexus brand. Honda released the newer Accord hybrid and it possibly may release the Civic hybrid again. Why did Nissan pull the hybrid model off production when hybrids are still selling? The Nissan Rogue now has a hybrid model.
Nissan obviously believes that EV sales will not be ramping up anytime soon. This means that they are now predicting any or all of the following: 1) EV subsidies will soon be reduced or eliminated, 2) Battery costs are not coming down nearly as fast as predicted, 3) Current Lithium batteries are going to be displaced by another technology requiring a different production process and obsoleting Lithium oriented factories.