J.D. Power Study Claims New Cars 'More Appealing Than Ever' in 2017

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

We’ve always been slightly hesitant to share J.D. Power and Associates’ Initial Quality Study, especially given how easily analysis can be clouded by customers failing to understand the technology within their own vehicles. However, the market research firm still provides an interesting peek into what consumers seem to covet versus what they actually purchase.

In J.D. Power’s U.S. Automotive Performance, Execution and Layout Study, consumers were asked how they “feel” about their vehicles on a more visceral level in order to evaluate the car’s overall appeal — or its APEAL, as it were.

Based on a 1,000-point scale, the 2017 survey showed overall satisfaction increased from a score of 801 points to 810 — the highest in the study’s 22-years of existence. Perched at the top of the most appealing brands list is Porsche, for a 13th consecutive year of glory, but it didn’t record the most marked improvement.

Chrysler did.

Considering FCA has languished near the bottom of nearly every reliability or enjoyment survey in recent years, Chrysler’s 41-point jump is a big surprise. However, buyers of the Chrysler Pacifica seemed plussed enough to make a huge difference for the brand. It was the highest-rated minivan of the year, despite not being able to outsell the Dodge Caravan. However, that’s likely down to the Caravan being the far better bargain, which is what drives most purchasing decisions — something J.D. Power seems woefully ignorant of.

Dodge’s Challenger also received special accolades for being the “midsize sporty car” with the highest overall appeal in 2017.

It wasn’t enough to bring any of FCA’s brands up to Porsche’s APEAL score of 884, though. Chrysler topped out at 815. Germany dominated with the highest-ranked brands and models overall. With the exception of Hyundai’s Genesis (869), the top ranked brands were BMW (855), Audi (854), and Mercedes-Benz (851).

While Mercedes possessed an exceptionally high average score, didn’t have the standout models BMW and Audi had. Audi’s A3, A4, and A7 all led within their perspective segments — as did BMW’s M2 and X1. Porsche also had leaders with the Macan, Cayenne, and 911 but, based on the lack of competition, it’s almost unfair to mention them.

Segment leaders from other automakers included the Ford F-Series, Lincoln Continental, Chevrolet Bolt, Chevy Tahoe, Cadillac Escalade, Mini Cooper/Clubman, Honda CR-V, Honda Ridgeline, Nissan Altima, Nissan Murano, and Kia’s Cadenza, Niro, and Soul.

These were the vehicles owners evaluated as possessing the highest emotional attachment and level of excitement within their respective segments. As always, J.D. Power didn’t provide a predictably useful breakdown of exactly how it measured the 77 attributes consumers were supposed to weigh in on. But it did say metrics were based on responses from roughly 70,000 new vehicle buyers or lessees after the first 90 days of ownership. When pressed for a more comprehensive explanation of the study, the firm provided its standard response: that detailed information is reserved for the automakers willing to purchase it.

Ideally, J.D. Power wants manufacturers to know they’re making the proper moves to make consumers happy.

“Many automakers are getting better and better at giving consumers what they want in a vehicle,” said Dave Sargent, vice president of global automotive at J.D. Power, in a statement. “The industry is doing a very good job of creating vehicles customers like across every segment, and the APEAL Study identifies why this is. One clear reason is that non-premium vehicles are increasingly offering technology and safety features found in premium vehicles.”

Of course, if manufacturers want to know exactly how to get an edge over their competition, they’ll have to pay. Market research is a business after all.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 21 comments
  • I applaud Fiasler wholeheartedly if these results truly indicate a genuine improvement in the quality of its vehicles. (About goddamned time - oops, sorry.) And I'll express an utter lack of surprise if this is later revealed to be more the result of "bring your survey down to the dealership, and we'll both fill it out while we run your shiny new CharLlengerIfica300GranDartRAM! through the car wash."

  • Thornmark Thornmark on Jul 26, 2017

    >>Segment leaders from other automakers included ........ Nissan Altima

    • Krhodes1 Krhodes1 on Jul 27, 2017

      If your standards are low enough to consider an Altima in the first place, you are unlikely to be disappointed by it. If your previous car was a 10yo clapped out whatever, a new Altima will probably feel like a spaceship.

  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
Next