QOTD: What to Do With Mazda?

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Yesterday, Steph Willems asked in his Question of the Day what BMW should do with Mini and its lineup of identical-but-different vehicles almost nobody is buying. Since it seems like you’re quite eager to give brand strategy advice, let’s do it again today.

I want you to tell me what you’d do with Mazda, because its current PR line isn’t sitting well with me.

The PR I’m referring to is from the article Tim Cain wrote on Monday, where the CEO of Mazda North America outlined consumer loyalty, market share and brand advancement desires for the company.

If you haven’t read it already, click the link above so you’re informed for the rest of our discussion and we can engage in the sort of thought-provoking, worldly dialogue I desire every single day. (Oh, and Tim gets clicks.)

Masahiro Moro’s points can be broken down into the following:

  • Mazda owner loyalty is low (39 percent vs. industry average 53 percent), and needs to increase
  • 2-percent market share is the goal, up from a current 1.7 percent
  • The 2-percent share will be obtained though quality customers, not incentives and discounts
  • Higher prices for existing products (via upscale trim levels)
  • Mazda Premium strategy, image establishment
  • Mazda does not compete in over 40 percent of the market segments in America

Now, it’s fine to say you want more of the pie, and having high-quality pie — the kind grandma makes — is the best kind of pie. But making those kinds of pies requires love, care, and many ingredients. You can’t make the pie taste better by putting it on a more expensive plate; substance is required.

To get the bullets above pointed in directions Mazda desires, I think it still needs to make a few changes, and they’re substantive.

  • Address the NVH (noise, vibration, and harshness) issues present in all Mazda models across the range
  • Improve dealer coverage throughout the nation, because you can’t buy from a dealer that doesn’t exist
  • A premium image requires a V6 option, even if you borrow it from another company, like Toyota
  • Offer diesel options across the range to support diesel enthusiasts
  • Address that 40-percent segment deficiency with new models, and a modular architecture (like VW)
  • Dump the “Driving Matters” preachy tagline, because the 375 people who care about that are already buying Mazda anyway

Certainly, I’m missing some points, and no doubt you’ll tell me I’m wrong on some of them. But Mazda needs to get the ball rolling here.

So tell me, what would you do with Mazda at your command?

[Image: Mazda]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 161 comments
  • Crossx5 Crossx5 on Jun 03, 2017

    Being a current mazda owner, I can suggest my wish list here, along with usual suggestions in the article. I think they need a couple of things. - A differentiated product line like i and s. Where s can carry forward their current idea and i can evolve to more mainstream comfortable cars. - s can adopt higher power, rather more torque, engines like 2.5 or 2.2d turbos. - i can adopt to a higher combined power using borrowed hybrid tech. I recall toyota was licensing their for free. - Probably more niche products like mazda3/6 wagons. I would readily trade my cx5 for a 2.2d turbo mazda 6 alltrack wagon. A similar type formula had done wonders for Subaru. They didn't fight battles on other's ground buy created a new ground altogether.

  • Dash323 Dash323 on Aug 28, 2017

    Make that 2.5 the base model engine and retune the 2.5t so that the turbo doesn't pull as earl as it does in the CX-9. Now, this is an idea I've had since the new RF came out: Take the Miata power train and make coupe with the hatchback body lines of the 3. Maybe put in that 2.5 or 2.5t. I'm guessing the extra hp would offset the weight from making it a hatchback. Call it the MX-3.

  • Tassos Ask me if I care for the idiotic vehicles less than 10% of whose owners use as INTENDED.
  • Brandon The 2024 Mercedes-Benz E 350 4Matic looks like a compelling addition to the luxury sedan market. From the drive notes, it’s clear that Mercedes-Benz has maintained its commitment to blending performance with comfort. The handling and acceleration seem impressive, reflecting Mercedes’ signature blend of power and smoothness.
  • Jmanb52 In this case clearly a driver responsbile for the accident. Lawyer just trying to add confusion to jude and or jury to think about it. I was on a jury once for an auto accident and one of the attorneys tried a few stunts to shift blame. Same thing is happening here. The companies pushing autonamous want to deal with fleet markets like the autonamous taxi companies rather than individual consumers. In my opinion I think they belvie that would be more predictable sales. Car gets to xyz milage time to replace. In my opinion they could never sell a full autonamous car to an individual because of a back and forth legal battles between owner and maker when there is a crash. They need to foget about all these take over driver aids. It is just causing more issues than it could prevent.
  • Jmanb52 Short answer is NO! It has been a tread for manufactures to basicaly glue a tablet to an area of the dash and call it an infotament system. However there is not one of us on here that doesn't ahve a smart phone or tablet. With the android auto, and the Apple Carplay and bluetooth that conencts car spekers and mic to our headset, do we even need an Infotament system or just bluetooth connection to use hands free mic and spearkers or wired connection to USB port for connection to spearkers / mic and charge the phone. So maybe the QOTD should be do manufactures even need to provide an infotanement system or should they just provide an in dash holder for a tablet or smartphone?
  • Jmanb52 In the past year I did some more research on EVs. I already knew for years they were heavier than a ICE car of the same model / class. Like the F150 lightning can be 1000 LBS heavier than its ICE counterpart. In the last year I read more on the size of breaks, tires and other items that take more resrouces to create and polute more in their wear. This was another nail in my corporate EV caufin. I already didn't have much care for them due to my height (over 6 feet) and they all have a bad desgin, over dependency on gimics, over computerized driving experience. If I ever did get one it would be a low range in town only type vehicle that I would convert an older car. There is no manufacture making EVs that is worth a penny of my money.
Next