QOTD: Do You Still Want A BMW?

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

The BMW M5, generation E39 from 1999-2003, continues to stand as one of my top five favorite cars of all time.

Yours too.

But the BMW of today is not the BMW that designed the 394-horsepower M5 nearly two decades ago. BMW now produces nearly half of its sales from utility vehicles and sells only a handful of sports cars each month. Setting aside classic sedan styling, the BMW of today will sell you ungainly X4s and X6s, plus bulbous hatchback versions of the 5 Series and 3 Series. Moreover, BMW’s core models — the 3 Series/4 Series — are distinctly less popular in the United States than they were a decade ago, when the market was smaller and the 3 Series lineup wasn’t as broad.

BMW is incentivizing its products heavily in early 2017 just to keep sales roughly where they were a year ago, a year in which BMW’s U.S. volume fell 9 percent compared with the 2015 peak.

Something’s not quite right. So do you, lover of the 1999 M5 and the BMW 2002 tii and the BMW 507 and the BMW Z8, still want a BMW?

Let’s not act as though BMW USA’s recent downturn suggests a total dearth of demand. True, BMW set U.S. sales records in 2015 and is off that pace by 11 percent through the first four months of 2017. But BMW is still on track to sell over 300,000 vehicles in the United States this year, a big leap from the average 248,000 annual sales BMW managed between 2002 and 2012.

BMW is still figuring out how to get the product balance right, as more utility vehicle production is required to meet demand for a five-strong group of crossovers that have pushed sales up 16 percent in early 2017 even as BMW’s car sales fell 13 percent.

Combined, the X1, X3, and X5 have grown their volume by more than 7,000 units in early 2017 — whether you want one or not, there are many who do. But the 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 Series cars combined lost nearly 8,000 sales so far this year.

On a mission to mainstreamify its cars, BMW evidently lost some of its luster. The Ultimate Driving Machine tagline is no longer quite as believable. The Mercedes-Benz C-Class is now the dominant luxury car nameplate, and C-Class sales are growing.

Of course, there are individual BMW variants that still hold great appeal to your car-loving soul. But does the blue and white roundel still carry the same weight as it did 5 or 10 or 20 years ago? Does the sound of a BMW inline-six still cause the hair on the back of your neck to stand up? Do you find yourself wishing you’d spent a little extra on a CPO 335i than you did on your Accord Touring?

Do you still want a BMW?

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 237 comments
  • WrittenDescription WrittenDescription on May 15, 2017

    I haven't wanted a BMW since our 2007 X5 required $6,800 in repairs (four separate breakdowns) within 18 months of coming off warranty. I began then to think that I was the sucker for buying rather than leasing a BMW.

  • Edgy36-39 Edgy36-39 on Jul 12, 2017

    Good article. I'm one of those that the brand has left behind with its new models. However, the issues you list out in the article mean that my 06 E46 M3 and 02 E39 will slowly become MORE valuable as time goes by. Pretty amazing thing to say about old cars.

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
Next