Auto Industry Has Its Fingers Crossed for Trump's $1 Trillion Infrastructure Plan: Toyota Exec

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

As automakers dial back sales projections in a year that’s seen a rough start, the industry could be holding out hope for a legislative solution to lagging demand.

Toyota North America CEO Jim Lentz made this claim during the opening of the company’s expanded Ann Arbor research and design center on Thursday, adding that incentivizing new vehicles to draw down bulging inventories can’t continue forever. In his view, automakers are keeping extra vehicles on hand for a reason, not just because production hasn’t adjusted for slow sales.

Lentz, like other auto executives, is hoping for a sales bump in the event the Trump administration green-lights its proposed $1 trillion infrastructure plan.

The administration, which released its tax plan on April 26, is said to be readying a massive infrastucture plan — possibly fueled by an increase to the federal gas tax, which Trump has said he might support on the condition the money flows to highways. Details of the plan are coming “pretty soon,” Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao told CNBC on Monday.

Trump reportedly wants the proposal in front of Congress as soon as possible. According to Lentz, automakers want the same thing.

“If you get a $1 trillion stimulus, that could add 800,000 units,” Lentz said. “That’s one reason everyone is on the accelerator” trying to unload vehicles.

April auto sales in the U.S. fell nearly 5 percent, the fourth consecutive month of year-over-year declines. This follows a record year in which U.S. consumers snapped up 17.55 million new vehicles. For 2017, Lentz said he forecasts sales in the 17 to 17.2 million range.

While a boost to infrastructure spending could turn the tide on light-vehicles sales, Lentz knows automakers can’t keep up the current pace forever. Before long, manufacturers will be forced to decide “when is it prudent to lift off the accelerator,” he said, adding that the current level of incentives isn’t sustainable.

[Source: Reuters] [Image: Toyota Motor Corporation]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 69 comments
  • Mikedt Mikedt on May 05, 2017

    At this point Trump's 1 trillion is largely tax breaks to companies which means our highway/road infrastructure fixes will be limited to things that pay back money directly to their owners, i.e. toll roads an toll bridges. The crappy roads and bridges in your communities will continue to crumble.

  • Lynn Ellsworth Lynn Ellsworth on May 05, 2017

    Rich people travel in helicopters. Were not going to see any new roads. Trump and the conservative Republicans think anyone who earns less than $1 million a year is trash they hope will die off with their new health bill. Can you imagine any insurance companies dealing with 50 state plans the new health bill advocates? And why are we picking on insurance companies? What about hospital conglomerates, multi-million dollar salaries for hospital administrators, high drug prices, outrageous medical equipment costs, no sharing among hospitals - every hospital conglomerate buys every new device?

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
Next