Seriously? Nissan Intends To Quintuple Titan Volume and Market Share
By broadening its lineup, rethinking the dealer approach, and focusing on prime markets, Nissan intends to increase its Titan pickup truck’s share of America’s full-size market to 5 percent.
5 percent. One in twenty trucks. One Titan for every 19 Ford F-Series, Chevrolet Silverado, Ram P/U, GMC Sierra, and Toyota Tundra.
That doesn’t sound so crazy, does it?
Nah, at least until you realize that in 2016, Nissan sold fewer than 22,000 Titans, or slightly less than 1 percent market share.
There are reasons to believe Nissan could get there, but there are at least as many reasons — if not more — to believe the 5 percent market share goal, equal to roughly 112,000 annual Titan sales, is unreasonable, if not outlandish.
“We now have a full lineup of vans and we now have a full lineup of trucks that complement each other,” Nissan’s Fred Diaz, Nissan’s North American truck boss, said at the Chicago Auto Show debut of the Titan King Cab, Nissan’s extended cab pickup.
With the arrival of the King Cab, Nissan will now have the semi-heavy-duty Titan XD with gas and diesel engines plus the regular-duty Titan with the V8 engine in crew, single, and extended cabs. Nissan’s Titan lineup has never been this exhaustive, not even when annual Titan volume peaked at 86,945 units in its first-generation’s first full year, 2005.
Nissan’s full-size pickup truck market share at that time: 3.5 percent.
Nissan is also altering the dealer approach to full-size trucks, Automotive News reports.
This includes fronting dealer lots with trucks and employing specialists in the truck and commercial vehicle sector as well as intensive training in order for sales consultants to know how to sell a Versa Note and a Titan Platinum Reserve.
“You’ve got to know trucks and talk trucks when these customers come in,” Diaz says.
Part of that enhanced dealer approach will require a focus on key pickup truck markets. Instead of foisting identical targets upon wildly diverse markets, Nissan is providing dealers with new data sets that enable more regionally sensitive goals.
In January, for instance, Nissan pointed out that the Titan outsold the far more common Toyota Tundra in Omaha, Nebraska and Salt Lake City, Utah. Granted, that’s not exactly Dallas, let alone America, but the Titan had never achieved that result in the past.
But even in January, as year-over-year Titan volume nearly tripled, Nissan owned just 1.8 percent of America’s full-size truck market. Nissan continues to be faced with the greatest challenge of all: in 2017, Ford, General Motors, Ram, and even Toyota are revolving doors for full-size pickup truck buyers who have always driven F-150s, Silverados, Hemis, and Tundras.
More than 90 percent of full-size truck buyers choose a pickup from one of the traditional Detroit marques. Not only does Titan need to convince a large chunk of those buyers to purchase or lease a Titan, that stage of persuasion isn’t possible until Nissan has persuaded buyers to come and have a look. That’s a hugely challenging task in a market with such entrenched loyalty.
While Nissan slowly launched the second-generation Titan — first as the niche market XD early last year, the regular-duty Titan crew cab in September, and then the single cab in November — the competition didn’t sit still.
Ford brought the ten-speed automatic to the F-150 for the 2017 model year and has thoroughly refreshed the F-150 for the 2018 model year, adding a diesel engine and improving its current stable of powerplants. GM and Ram drop special edition trucks seemingly every day at breakfast, lunch, and supper.
The Titan lineup, meanwhile, isn’t that expansive. The countless build configurations on offer from the traditional segment dominators bears little resemblance to the tidy range provided by Nissan.
More importantly, Titan fails on the fuel economy front, with the most efficient four-wheel-drive Titan rated at 15 miles per gallon city and 21 mpg on the highway. We measured 12.7 mpg in our test.
“The 2017 Nissan Titan needed to be better than its high-volume rivals,” I wrote last month in a Titan review. “It needed to be better than good enough. It isn’t.”
Of course, Nissan can earn the 5-percent market share and 100,000+ annual sales results the company desires. Virtually any automaker can.
For every vehicle, there is a price point where any level of market share is theoretically possible, though likely not profitable.
Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Kwik_Shift Once 15 Minute Cities start to be rolled out, you won't be far enough away from home to worry about range anxiety.
- Bobbysirhan I'd like to look at all of the numbers. The eager sheep don't seem too upset about the $1,800 delta over home charging, suggesting that the total cost is truly obscene. Even spending Biden bucks, I don't need $1,800 of them to buy enough gasoline to cover 15,000 miles a year. Aren't expensive EVs supposed to make up for their initial expense, planet raping resource requirements, and the child slaves in the cobalt mines by saving money on energy? Stupid is as stupid does.
- Slavuta Civic EX - very competent car. I hate the fact of CVT and small turbo+DI. But it is a good car. Good rear seat. Fix the steering and keep goingBut WRX is just a different planet.
- SPPPP This rings oh so very hollow. To me, it sounds like the powers that be at Ford don't know which end is up, and therefore had to invent a new corporate position to serve as "bad guy" for layoffs and eventual scapegoat if (when) the quality problems continue.
- Art Vandelay Tasos eats $#!t and puffs peters
The "Detroit 3" aren't stupid. They know where their money comes from, and they spend a lot adding new features, etc. to their pickups. The only way Toyota competes is because of its reputation for superior quality. On features, etc., not so much. As a trailer guy, IMHO, the new XD diesel is a big fail. The 5-liter Cummins engine is nice but heavy. As a result, the truck's payload suffers a lot (and the truck is pretty heavy to begin with). If you're towing an 8,000 lb. trailer, at least of 800 lbs of that is tongue weight being carried by the truck. Add the weight of 3-4 passengers and stuff in the bed, and you're probably substantially overloaded. There's a reason why the other mfrs. who are putting diesels in "1/2 ton" pickups are using small displacement (2.8-3 liters) diesel engines with heavy turbocharging: there's less of a payload penalty as compared to the gasoline powered versions. Longevity in heavy service maybe another matter . . . but the mileage figures look great; and that still sells trucks to some people.
Only one engine available in the 2017 Single Cab Titan- 5.6L V8. Even with the 7-speed auto it will be a tall order to dent GM/Ford/FCA market share in the Fleet/Commercial space. Not going to happen without monster incentives.