Hindustan Ambassador Only Part of PSA's Push in India

Ronnie Schreiber
by Ronnie Schreiber

The Hindustan Ambassador, in production from 1958 to 2014, is an iconic vehicle. Iconic enough that news of Peugeot SA’s acquisition of the Ambassador brand from the C.K. Birla group’s Hindustan Motors got a fair amount attention despite most of the automotive news media being focused on Peugeot parent PSA’s proposed purchase of Opel and Vauxhall from General Motors.

As it happens, the $12,000,000 Ambassador deal is part of a much larger play in India by PSA that may work out to be as significant a move on the subcontinent as the Opel deal is in Europe. Now that the French government has bailed out PSA, they have big plans for India.

In late January, the French publication Les Echos reported that PSA and the Birla group had entered into two long term joint ventures with an initial investment of $105 million (700 crore rupees) to build vehicles and powertrains in Tamil Nadu state. One of the ventures — with Hindustan Motors Finance Corporation — is for the assembly of PSA cars, likely in Hindustan’s assembly plant in Tiruvallur, near Chennai, which currently builds Mitsubishi Pajeros Sports and Isuzu commercial vehicles. PSA will be the majority partner in that venture.

A second deal will give PSA an equal share in a powertrain assembly venture with AVTEC, which had previously been spun off from Hindustan Motors.

This isn’t the first time PSA affiliated companies have tried to crack the Indian market. Back in 1994 when the Ambassador was still selling in significant numbers, Peugeot had a joint venture with India’s Premier Automobiles.

Premier had been building the Fiat Padmini, the Ambassador’s biggest competitor. Peugeot hoped to use Premier’s factory to assemble 309 models, but labor strife, and pique at another deal Premier made with Fiat, convinced them to withdraw from India just three years later. In 2011, PSA announced plans to build a factory in Gujarat with a capacity of 170,000 vehicles per year and even showcased vehicles at the Auto Expo, India’s major corporate auto show. PSA’s subsequent financial turmoil put an end to those plans.

As part of CEO Carlos Tavares’ recovery plan, PSA had announced intentions to identify a local partner in India to reenter that market. In 2014, the French company had established what it was calling the “India-Pacific” business zone, to serve markets in India, the rest of the SAARC countries, Japan, Korea, Australia and New Zealand. Until the announcement of the deal with Hindustan last month, it was PSA’s only global business zone without any manufacturing facilities. As with other international firms with operations in India, PSA will likely use that country as an export base to countries in that part of the world.

There is no word on which, if any, of PSA’s models will be rebranded as an Ambassador.

[Images: Peugeot, CK Birla Group]

Ronnie Schreiber
Ronnie Schreiber

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, the original 3D car site.

More by Ronnie Schreiber

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next