2017 Mazda MX-5 RF: Folding Fastback Fun Starts at $32,390

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Mazda has kicked off presale orders for its 2017 MX-5 RF, the “retractable fastback” that gives would-be convertible buyers an extra feature to help win their spouse’s support.

Introduced to salivating journalists at the New York Auto Show, the model starts at $32,390 (including a $835 destination charge) in Club trim — a $2,955 increase over a 2016 MX-5 Club.

The model blends elements of the convertible and the defunct coupe, employing a targa-style retractable roof for partial al fresco motoring. Powertrain components are borrowed, unchanged, from the raved-about MX-5. Because this is a Pure Sports Car, a six-speed manual transmission comes standard; opting for the six-speed automatic tacks an extra $730 to the entry price.

The first orders are devoted to the high-end Launch Edition variant, with first dibs on the 1,000 unit allotment reserved for Miata loyalists. That model retails for $34,685 with a manual, or $35,760 with an automatic. Surprisingly, Mazda claims there’s still some available.

Buyers looking for a less exclusive ride will have to wait until the full range of RFs arrive in early 2017. The model stands apart from its cloth-topped siblings with a 4.6-inch TFT gauge, blind spot monitoring and Rear Cross Traffic Alert (which shows up on all 2017 MX-5 Club models), and seven-inch Mazda Connect touchscreen infotainment system. A Bose nine-speaker stereo incorporates speakers built into the vehicle’s headrests, meaning your retro iPod mix won’t disappear into the slipstream.

MX-5 RF Club models equipped with a manual transmission can be optioned with a Brembo/BBS Package. That loot bag, which includes side sill body extensions, a front shock-tower brace, grippier brakes and lightweight 17-inch wheels, brings the vehicle’s price to $35,790.

Uplevel Grand Touring-spec MX-5 RFs start at $33,455, with automatic models retailing for $34,660.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 43 comments
  • Duffman13 Duffman13 on Oct 06, 2016

    Personally, I thought the RF Miata offered a benefit over the soft-top: The abilty to do a track day without the requirement to gut the rear plastics and install an aftermarket rollbar. I know I'm in the minority with that opinion, but take it for what it is. Seeing this pricing, it just doesn't make sense to me, particularly at $35k for the Brembo/BBS option. For The same money you could buy a BRZ with the new Brembo/sachs/wheels package at sticker price and have money left over to get yourself a decent condition NA or NB for some top-down fun.

  • Kato Kato on Oct 06, 2016

    I too fail to see the point of this thing. I predict it will have limited appeal and low sales. They should build a Miata coupe ala MGBGT or Z3 coupe. It would have most of the appeal of a Miata and be way more practical.

  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
  • JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
  • Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
  • JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
  • JLGOLDEN Our family bought a 2012 Murano AWD new, and enjoyed it for 280K before we sold it last month. CVT began slipping at 230K but it was worth fixing a clean, well-cared for car. As soon as we sold the 2012, I grabbed a new 2024 Murano before the body style and powertrain changes for 2025, and (as rumored) goes to 4-cyl turbo. Sure, the current Murano feels old-school, with interior switchgear and finishes akin to a 2010 Infiniti. That's not a bad thing! Feels solid, V6 sounds awesome, and the whole platform has been around long enough that future parts & service wont be an issue.
Next