Tesla Will Tweak Autopilot to Reduce Crashes, Liability, Bad Press: Report

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Earlier this summer, headlines flew fast and furious around Tesla’s semi-autonomous Autopilot driving system, and the often hazy crashes associated with it.

Now, the electric automaker plans to tweak the system to cut down on driver misuse, according to a report in Elektrek.

The May crash that put Tesla’s technology under a microscope was billed as the first fatal accident involving a self-driving car. In the wake of Joshua Brown’s death in a Tesla Model S — a crash attributed in part to the Autopilot’s failure to recognize a tractor-trailer — other crashes cropped up, many of them the result of bad driving, or failure to understand the system.

The incidents compelled the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Transportation Safety Board, and a U.S. Senate safety committee to launch investigations into the technology. Several groups called on Tesla to shelve its technology until it becomes fool-proof. In response, Tesla hopes to people-proof its Autopilot.

Elektrek claims that the automaker will add safety features to the system to avoid a repeat of those earlier incidents. Essentially, the updates will prevent drivers from accessing certain features if the vehicle thinks they’re not following the rules.

All Autopilot-equipped Teslas periodically harass their owners, reminding them to keep their hands on the wheel when Autopilot is engaged. Ignore multiple warnings, and the vehicle aborts shuts down Autopilot. Now, a version 8.0 software update adds a new response: not only will the vehicle shut down the Autopilot, it will also prevent the driver from re-engaging the system. At least, not until the vehicle is stopped and its transmission placed in “Park.”

Use the system correctly, and there’s no need for the software to lock you out.

The automaker hasn’t announced when it will make the upgrade available, but the publication expects its release “imminently.”

[Image: David Marek/The Truth About Cars]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 20 comments
  • Markogts Markogts on Aug 30, 2016

    That's what happens when there are two drivers. Simply put, we need to transition from level 1 to level 4 automation immediately. Intermediate steps are too dangerous in that there is no clear indication who's driving.

  • The Doctor The Doctor on Aug 30, 2016

    Looks like someone has made a mercantile calculation of liability.

  • Tassos WARSAW VIP WOMEN USE POWER TOOLS TO WAX LYRICALLY ABOUT HOW MUCH OF A SERIOUS PERSON I AM!
  • FreedMike People are bringing up PHEVs, which I've shopped, and passed on. Why? Because they're great if what you want is high MPG, but if you're an enthusiast driver, your choices are going to be very limited unless you're willing to pop for a $50,000-or-up vehicle (which I'm not). Otherwise, your best choices are the Prius Prime or RAV4 Prime, and assuming you can actually put your mitts on one, and are willing to get bent over on price (both models are unicorns in my neck of the woods), neither is much fun to drive. That leaves you with a Mitsubishi CUV, or various other H/K CUVS, all of which are expensive for what you get, and aren't any fun to drive either. Hopefully there are better choices forthcoming.
  • Jkross22 I doubt it. If I have money for an extra fun car and all of the insurance, maintenance storage and gas needed, I'm not sure I'd even get one then.
  • 3-On-The-Tree I use Ridgid brand because it was on sale and got several extra batteries and drill. Haven’t had any issues in 5 years. I take my impact on trips in case I have to change a tire on I-10 to expedite the process so I don’t get run over.
  • 3-On-The-Tree To Bd2. A lot of the times there is no reply button next to the comment I want to reply to. Case in point on your comment only the “Like” icon is showing.
Next