Your Volkswagen Diesel Will Still Be a Polluting Automotive Pariah After Being Fixed

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Volkswagen diesel owners will be able to spend many happy, polluting miles on the road, even after they request a fix instead of a buyback.

Buried in the automaker’s $15.3 billion U.S. settlement is the expectation that most of the recalled vehicles will still spew twice the allowable rate of emissions after being repaired, according to Bloomberg. A fix for the 475,000 2.0-liter diesels hasn’t been approved, but regulators fully expect any repair plan to fail — and they’re grudgingly okay with it.

Under the buyback plan, owners can trade their defeat device-equipped cars for cash, or seek a repair. The problem is pre-2015 2.0-liter TDI models came with an older engine that’s proving hard to clean up.

The Natural Resources Defense Council told Bloomberg that a full mechanical fix — meaning the installation of a urea tank system used by later models — was taken off the table after Volkswagen deemed it too expensive. No regulator will say what the automaker’s proposed fix is, but the California Air Resources Board claims any repair will only reduce emissions by 80 to 90 percent. That means the older diesels will still be twice as dirty as they should be.

What makes CARB and the Environmental Protection Agency okay with this? Money — specifically the $4.7 billion set aside in the settlement for environmental mitigation measures. If Volkswagen’s diesels are going to continue to pollute, other sources of emissions need to go.

“The settlement protects both consumers and the public,” EPA spokesman Nick Conger told Bloomberg. “It offers owners the flexibility to choose what’s right for them, and requires VW to fully offset the excess NOx pollution it is responsible for.”

According to CARB, the upgraded emissions system on older fixed vehicles will be certified to last 120,000 miles, with the newer models being certified for 150,000.

A fix for the newest models is expected by July 29, with approval scheduled for October 14. Second-generation TDI models have a fix proposal deadline of December 16, and could be approved by March 3. The oldest diesels have a deadline of November 11, and an approval date of January 27. Volkswagen’s proposed fix for its 3.0-liter diesel models was recently rejected by U.S. regulators.

[Image: Volkswagen of America]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 45 comments
  • Whittaker Whittaker on Jul 20, 2016

    “VW should be compelled to make owners whole either through compensation or through ensuring adherence for existing emissions compliance that governs all diesel cars. Owner’s choice.” Agree. And its not that hard to understand.

    • Tedward Tedward on Jul 20, 2016

      I don't think anyone has contested that as an ideal situation. The problems with it are in implementation and political consequence. Basically, how would it be done, who would do it, what penalties for non-compliance, what compliance rate in the first place, what chance of passing judicial review and let's just add what effect on foreign policy? That's just top of my head, I'm sure there's more. In a way the solution was actually pretty admirable. The epa is billions richer, the fines are huge and provide future deterrence and the political ramifications that could jeapordize the above are minimized. Smells like politics, which are inevitable.

  • Jthorner Jthorner on Jul 21, 2016

    I said from day 1 of this scandal that VW would simple not be able to make the cars emissions compliant and maintain fuel economy and system durability. If you have one, take the buyback money and run.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
Next