No LIDAR Means No Safety in Self-Driving Vehicles, Says Auto Supplier Exec
If you’re going to let people take their hands off the wheel and let the vehicle do the driving, you’d better offer every tool available to make sure it’s safe.
That’s the view of Stefan Sommer, CEO of German auto parts supplier ZF Friedrichshafen, who advocated for the use of LIDAR (light detection and ranging) in autonomous or semi-autonomous vehicles in the wake of the fatal Tesla crash.
Quoted in Automotive News, Sommer said he didn’t have any details on the May 7 crash that killed Joshua Brown, but he did know what it takes to make sure a vehicle knows what’s in front of it.
“For autonomous driving, we will need three core technologies: picture processing camera technology, short and long-range radar and lidar,” Sommer said at a news conference today.
LIDAR uses laser beams to map out objects in front of a vehicle in a similar manner to radar waves. It’s an expensive technology, but several companies are actively pursuing it — including U.S.-based Velodyne and a Canadian developer that plans to conduct vehicle trials over the next two years.
Sommer said that LIDAR’s ability to recognize objects in bright-light and low-light situations makes it essential for any autonomous driving system. While he refrained from mentioning Tesla’s technology, that company’s Autopilot uses only a forward-facing radar and camera to see the road ahead, along with external sensors to monitor the vehicle’s immediate surroundings.
Brown’s Model S drove underneath the trailer of a transport truck while on Autopilot after the system failed to recognize the brightly lit trailer against the equally bright sky. Tesla confirmed that the light confused the system, but repeated its earlier warning that drivers need to remain aware of the road and be able to respond quickly while using Autopilot.
A Tesla Model S test vehicle spotted in California in March appeared to be outfitted with LIDAR, meaning future versions of Autopilot could adopt the technology. If it does go that route, Tesla could market Autopilot as a fully autonomous system, once lawmakers allow it.
Of course, there’s always those looking for an easier way to get the same result. In an interview with TTAC, Millennial hacker-turned-inventor George Hotz — who created his own self-driving vehicle from an Acura ILX — said he plans to develop a camera-only system for autonomous driving. His ILX testbed used LIDAR at first, but he said the cost of a Velodyne device is prohibitive. Cameras, on the other hand, have never been cheaper.
[Image: Volvo]
More by Steph Willems
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Basically a Qashqai/Rogue Sport that looks like the new Rogue, but with the Kicks name.
- Fred I guess this also competes with the Honda HR-V. I'm driving a 2021 and this offers a few improvements, hopefully the driver assists work better, bigger screen, maybe nicer seats. I trust Honda more than Nissan for reliability. I'd miss the magic seats. And then there is the extra $5000 or so it would cost me.
- Arthur Dailey 143 different interior options! I realize that is now untennable, but still would like more options regarding interior colours, including the instrument panels/dashboards. Black on black is depressing. Drum brakes and no HVAC system. And yet we have 'young whippersnappers' complaining about some modern vehicles being 'penalty boxes'. Try driving a family around in a 1960's stripped VW Beetle during a Canadian winter and then you can start talking about penalty boxes. ;-)Personally that final picture of the red coloured car with the 3/4 view shows it to be just beautifully proportioned. Still retains the P-38 styling finishing in those attractive vertical tail lights. And the horizontal chrome trim along the bottom of the trunk lid adds a nice touch.
- Jeff Nice to see a more affordable vehicle. For the price it is a lot of vehicle for the money. Dodge needs a vehicle like this.
- Arthur Dailey Coincidentally we saw a Mazda B series pick-up just the other day in the parking lot of a golf course and I could not help but mention it to my playing partners, both of whom are 'car guys'. One mentioned that his cousin has a 20+ year old base model Ford Ranger that they use for trips to the building and garden supply stores.
Comments
Join the conversation
And "Moooh," says a cow. Humans manage with nothing but a fo4rward facing stereo camera. No doubt Lidar has properties that, at least seemingly, is desirable for auto awareness in traffic, but it's hardly black and white. In general, and as much as this flies in the face of pervasive indoctrinated progressive dogma, "................., says some dude equipped with a hole in the head from which sound can emanate" carries exactly, no more no less, as much weight as ditto from the cow mentioned above. Build an autonomous car using Lidar, and see if yours, over time, meaningfully outperforms all those built without. No use moooh'ing about it.
And in the process my Valentine One becomes useless . . .