Phoenix Dealership Fined for Not Fixing Recalled Vehicles Before Sale

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

After an investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, an Arizona dealership promised it won’t sell recalled vehicles sans repair.

Sands Chevrolet LLC of Phoenix agreed to pay a $40,000 civil penalty and will shore up its sales procedure in the wake of the probe. The dealer will now check all vehicles for outstanding recalls before delivery and whenever a vehicle is brought in for repair.

Sands’ troubles began in May 2014, after a report delivered to the NHTSA revealed the dealership sold and delivered vehicles that were subject to safety recalls, minus the required repairs. Suspecting the dealer was in violation of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, the agency opened an investigation.

Those vehicles, the 2012-2013 Buick Lacrosse and Regal and the 2013 Chevrolet Malibu Eco, were equipped with the eAssist hybrid system. General Motors recalled 40,000 units for a fault in the system’s control module, which caused the hybrid’s battery to slowly drain. This led to stalls and the potential for trunk fires.

Dealerships are notified of all safety recalls by the manufacturer, meaning Sands didn’t perform due diligence.

“NHTSA’s investigation indicated that Sands Chevrolet did sell and deliver recalled vehicles that did not have the recall remedy completed at the time the vehicles were delivered to the customers,” the agency stated. “NHTSA therefore concluded that Sands Chevrolet was liable for civil penalties for violations of the Safety Act.”

The investigation ended on May 22. Sands admitted fault, and said the last unrepaired vehicle left its lot in June 2015. Besides checking new and pre-owned vehicles, the dealership will also look for outstanding recalls on all trade-ins.

[Source: Law360]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • -Nate -Nate on May 29, 2016

    Wait , what ? . . An unscrupulous Automobile Dealership ?! . . Not possible . . -Nate

  • WildcatMatt WildcatMatt on Jun 13, 2016

    "Besides checking new and pre-owned vehicles, the dealership will also look for outstanding recalls on all trade-ins." This sounds like an opening for something like this: "I'm sorry, sir, but because your trade has an open recall on it I will have to offer you $1000 less for it."

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next