Roll With It: FCA Voluntarily Recalls 1.1 Million Models With Confusing Gear Selector
Like an unoccupied Dodge Charger stuck in “Drive,” Fiat Chrysler Automobiles’ gear selector controversy was rapidly building momentum before yesterday’s announcement.
Responding to numerous instances of runaway vehicles and an expanding National Highway Traffic Safety Administration investigation, FCA voluntarily recalled 811,586 vehicles in the U.S. and 52,144 in Canada, and a further 265,473 in Mexico and overseas.
The recalled models — certain 2012-2014 Dodge Chargers and Chrysler 300s, and 2014-2015 Jeep Grand Cherokees — were equipped with the company’s eight-speed automatic transmission and featured a gear selector that bewildered many owners. Some drivers exited their vehicles after mistakenly believing the selector was in “Park,” leading to 41 known injuries.
In a statement, FCA said the accidents were due to driver error, and emphasized that the gear selectors — though confusing — functioned as designed:
The vehicles affected by this recall are equipped with electronic shift levers that return to the same position after each manipulation. Gear-selection is conveyed to the driver by multiple sets of indicator lights, not gear-selector position, and unless due care is taken, drivers may draw erroneous conclusions about the status of their vehicles.
The automaker stopped using the gear selector after complaints piled up. The NHTSA began investigating those complaints last summer.
FCA said a warning chime sounds when the affected vehicle’s engine is running, the driver’s side door is ajar and the gear selector is out of Park, but that warning will be upgraded.
Other safety measures are planned, though the automaker remains vague on exactly what the fix will be. In their words, “The enhancements will combine warnings with a transmission-shift strategy to automatically prevent a vehicle from moving, under certain circumstances, even if the driver fails to select “PARK.”
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Lou_BC You'd think cops would have an understanding of the laws they are supposed to enforce.
- Merlyn I’m on my second Spark and love it! I can pass any car I’ve never had a problem going up a hill it does just fine. As for cargo I can fit three suitcases, two book bags and still have the front seat for a passenger. Not sure what point this guy is trying to make. I have hand free phone service and Sirius radio plug in my phone and have navigation. I would buy another spark in a heartbeat.
- Buickman I won't own one and I'll be happy!
- Jeanbaptiste Ever since y’all started sending your damn geese down here we’re just been waiting for one of you to show up.
- 3SpeedAutomatic Drove a rental Cherokee for several days at the beginning of this year. Since the inventory of rental cars is still low, this was a 2020 model with 48k miles and V6. Ran fine, no gremlins, graphics display was easy to work, plenty of power, & very comfortable. Someone must of disarmed the lane assistance feature for the steering wheel never shook (YES!!!!!!!!). However, this woman's voice kept nagging me about the speed limit (what's new!?!?!?!).I was impressed enough to consider this a prime candidate to replace my 11 yr old Ford Escape. Might get a good deal with the close out of the model. Time will tell. 🚗🚗🚗
"In a statement, FCA said the accidents were due to driver error, and emphasized that the gear selectors — though confusing — functioned as designed:" Blaming the owners? Sergio Marchionne is a jerk.
The "Shifter for Automatic Transmission" has a long history of problems. I'm just old enough to remember the PNDLR on the column, I think those were GMs. Apparently there was a detent to get into Reverse, pull back on the lever, but it was subject to wear. A significant number of drivers got R when they wanted D or L. The results were sometimes bad. Next one I recall was the Ford Reverse detent failure of the 1970s. Many cars slid out of P into R due to wear, vibration, and overall bad design of the mechanism. Again more bad endings. Then came the Audi 5000 "unintended acceleration"/"pedal misapplication". Out of that came the interlock between the brake and the shift lever. Could not shift out of Park without stepping on the brake. Next there was the system to prevent removal of the ignition key unless the shifter was in P. Most, if not all, cars and trucks with these devices had a method to bypass them if something failed so the car could be driven, but what happened when someone with no knowledge of this (and the owners manual is long gone) was stuck somewhere? Now we have cars without any keys so all these 'safety' systems are handled electronically. Of course, those systems NEVER have problems. I have not seen anything with the shifter described here. From what some have written there may not be a mechanical Parking Brake on some of these vehicles. This all seems lot a lot of trouble just waiting to happen. Anyone that leaves a vehicle without setting the Parking Brake (the lever or pedal that actuates some of the brake system) deserves what they get. I recall hearing, on a call in radio show, from someone that wanted to know if he could sue the car manufacturer because on the vehicle in question, from the 80s, the key could be removed without the shifter being in Park. According to the caller, the car, on two different occasions, rolled away and crashed into things when he left it. I stand with my statement about using the Parking Brake. And car makers that have these bizarre electronic shifters are asking for trouble.