2016 Honda Accord Sport 6MT Review - High Expectations
2016 Honda Accord Sport
Quality of life is about making the best of your surroundings. There isn’t a car on the market today that reflects that ethos more than the Honda Accord.
After years of growing to make room for smaller models in the lineup, the Accord — which has gathered accolades as the most reliable choice in the family car segment for decades — has skipped having a midlife crisis, and is still playing like a kid. It would be easy to say the Accord has always been a favorite for us, but as the competition improves, we wanted to come back and give the Accord another go.
Here’s what we learned after several days of puttering around southern California in the Accord Sport, the value-priced model that hits the sweet spot of what you have and what you want.
Sure, the Accord has grown, and grown, and grown in its lifetime — but who among us hasn’t? It hides its larger dimensions, thanks to oversized headlights and nice proportions, although it won’t stand out in a crowd. In San Marino red, which sparkled in the West Hollywood sunshine and reflected beautifully against sunsets in Malibu, the Accord looked a class above. A wise reviewer/mentor once declared that you’re not supposed to judge a car based on its color, but kudos to Honda for offering such a rich hue.
In short, the Accord’s interior feels like it’s built to last, and the Accord Sport offers refinement and build quality leaps and bounds above its price. The best way to understand a Honda interior is to get in and immediately start touching everything. The solid, tensile fabric of the cloth seats. The softness of the steering wheel leather. The knurled pattern of the shift knob. The chunkiness of the center control knob. There’s a reason you immediately feel comfortable in the Accord, and the Accord Sport (thankfully) ignores the trend of turning the “sporty” trim into an excuse for garish design.
Yes, the design itself appears dated, especially next to a comparable a Hyundai Sonata, but swoops and swashes aren’t for everyone.
By sticking with the Sport trim, you avoid a secondary screen on the dashboard, and any mention of THE TOUCHSCREEN VOLUME CONTROLS.
On the Accord Sport, there’s not much to see in terms of technology, thanks to rigid trim level differentiation (more on that later) that keeps most of the good stuff for loaded Accords only. A hooded screen sits atop the center stack, which is only useful for viewing the backup camera and a rudimentary trip computer. Neither navigation nor other goodies, like CarPlay, are offered on Accord Sport, but keeping it simple also means retaining traditional knobs and buttons for radio controls. Active and passive driver assist systems are available as part of the Honda Sensing package, which requires substituting the manual with the continuously variable transmission. In the decision between having fun with a manual gearbox and hearing a beep when you deviate from lane markings, there is a clear decision for enthusiasts, but I’m not sure there needs to be one.
Most Accords come with a direct injection, non-turbo 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine, although Honda still offers a V6, presumably to court legacy Accord buyers and continue the Accord v. Camry rivalry. Accord Sport models get a bump from 185 to 189 horsepower (yay!), and a slight bump in torque over LX, EX, and EX-Ls with the same four-cylinder powerplant. A six-speed manual transmission is standard on the Accord Sport, as it is on the LX and EX; a CVT is optional across the board, standard on the EX-L, and on both Accord EX-L V-6 and Touring.
Here’s the part you were waiting for: Yes, the Accord Sport with the manual still drives as sweetly as it ever has — and everything hereon reflects our opinion of the manual Accord Sport. We didn’t have a chance to spend time with the CVT volume model, but we can easily recommend spending some quality time with this manual one in particular.
The relationship among all the moving parts in the Accord has developed harmoniously over the last several decades, and the Accord Sport is the second most competent performer in this segment. (Top honors still go to the Mazda6 with the manual transmission.) For anyone who cares about driving, choosing an Accord over the competition means appreciating high quality in all aspects of life. The steering feels direct, not floaty. The clutch is forgiving, and the six-speed manual is as crisp to use as in any Honda performance car. The engine note sounds refreshingly unaltered. It’s fun to let the engine sing all the way up to redline in a way we couldn’t have expected the CVT to match. Even sitting in traffic in the hell that is California’s 405 freeway in rush hour, the Accord’s throttle was easy to manage, causing no left-leg clutch pedal fatigue.
The Accord Sport offers the confidence to enter a corner a little faster than you wanted, and come out even quicker. The standard 19-inch wheels do little to mar the ride quality, which ought to be much harsher given the larger-than-necessary rims. Braking performance could be stronger and firmer. Judging this family sedan against other family sedans, they’re just fine, but because the Accord’s chassis errs on the side of Four Door Sports Car, the comparison expands beyond the category.
With the Accord Sport, what you see is what you get for a not-unreasonable 25 grand. Honda fastidiously maintains trim levels, and there are no options on the Accord Sport. For more toys, you’ll need to upgrade to the EX, EX-L, or Touring trims. For example, Apple CarPlay, the infotainment innovation that could have turned the Accord Sport’s useless display screen into a useful one, is only available on Accord EXes and above. Further complication of the trim level strategy means that the excellent Honda Sensing driver assist tech isn’t available on any Accord with a manual transmission. Sigh. Even fully equipped, an Accord won’t run more than $35,000 or so, which is a great deal.
Disclosure: Honda provided the vehicle, insurance, and a tank of fuel for this review.
[Images: © 2016 Jeff Jablansky/The Truth About Cars]
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Wolfwagen I would rather have an annual inspection that may catch something early or at least the driver can be informed of an impending issue. Government vs private is another issue and unscrupulous mechanics is another.On a slightly different topic is the inspection of salvage or rebuilt cars. In NYS it is strictly to ensure that stolen parts were not used to rebuild the vehicle. I would rather see an inspection to ensure that the vehicle has been properly put back together.
- PeterPuck For years, Ford has simply reworked existing designs originating from Europe and Japanese manufacturers, not being capable of designing a decent car in the USA.What’s the last clean sheet design from the USA? The 1986 Taurus?And they still can’t manage to get things right.why is this? Are they putting all of the competent engineers and designers on the F150? Is woke diversification affecting them, as some rumours suggest? Are they rewarding incompetence?
- Brandon What is a "city crossover"?
- Tassos What was the last time we had any good news from Ford? (or GM for that matter?)The last one was probably when Alan Mulally was CEO. Were you even born back then?Fields was a total disaster, then they go hire this clown from Toyota's PR department, the current Ford CEO, Fart-ley or something.He claims to be an auto enthusiast too (unlike Mary Barra who is even worse, but of course always forgiven, as she is the proud owner of a set of female genitals.
- Tassos I know some would want to own a collectible Mustang. (sure as hell not me. This crappy 'secretary's car' (that was exactly its intended buying demo) was as sophisticated (transl. : CRUDE) as the FLintstone's mobile. Solid Real Axle? Are you effing kidding me?There is a huge number of these around, so they are neither expensive nor valuable.WHen it came out, it was $2,000 or so new. A colleague bought a recent one with the stupid Ecoboost which also promised good fuel economy. He drives a hard bargain and spends time shopping and I remember he paid $37k ( the fool only bought domestic crap, but luckily he is good with his hands and can fix lots of stuff on them).He told me that the alleged fuel economy is obtained only if you drive it like a VERY old lady. WHich defeats the purpose, of course, you might as well buy a used Toyota Yaris (not even a Corolla).
There's too much chrome on this car to be a "Sport" model. A small strip of chrome on the door handles would have been fine to stand out, but everything else should either be body colored, or blacked out.
The Sport was priced very fairly. But like others said I did not see the interior was upscale or made to last. It wore rather poorly in just 19K. The paint was the worst I had ever seen. This was my 11'th Honda-Acura since my 1986 LS Integra. The engine was smooth and got great mileage. However below 30F it sounded horrible on start up. Honda said it was fine. What ended my ownership with Hondas was wind noise and road noise and after all of these years Honda hasn't figured out the American roads. A lowly Mitsu O.S. is quieter and better tuned to the roads here. I moved on and if Honda wants me back they need to clean up their act. BTW- the stereo was a joke. Same with the last several Hondas I have had.