Will Volkswagen Hock Its Roundel for $21.5 Billion in Loans?

Ronnie Schreiber
by Ronnie Schreiber

On Friday, Barclays Plc announced it estimates the near-term costs of Volkswagen’s seemingly ever expanding emissions scandal will be about $27 billion USD (25 billion Euros).

Volkswagen’s automotive group had $29.6 billion in net liquidity at the the end of the third fiscal quarter of this year. About $10.8 billion is allocated to protect the company’s credit ratings. That leaves about $19 billion in cash for the company to work with.

There are fines that will be paid in a number of countries, along with goodwill gestures to owners of affected VW vehicles and incentives needed to sell cars from a tainted brand. Then there will the cost of litigation and any judgments or settlements that come out of those lawsuits.

About the same time as Barclays’ announcement, Automotive News and Bloomberg reported Volkswagen AG will be meeting in Wolfsburg this week with representatives of about a dozen banks to secure as much as $21.5 billion in loans by the end of this year. Those meetings aim to shore up the company’s financing and show the credit markets that VW has enough liquid assets to cover emissions-related costs.

VW declined to give any details about the proposed financing, saying that discussions with bankers are a part of normal operating procedure.

“We have always considered that a well-diversified portfolio of funding tools gives us the necessary flexibility to offer appropriate and competitive financing options for our customers as well as our industrial investment needs,” a Volkswagen representative told Bloomberg. “It is perfectly normal that we are in a constructive ongoing dialog.”

VW may say it’s the effort is standard operating procedure. However, to give you some perspective on a loan that large, just about 9 years ago, in November of 2006, another car company presented a group of banks with a request for a loan package to survive what was seen to be a rough patch ahead. It needed to survive some serious red ink, but even more important, it needed enough funds to develop the new product that would turn the company’s fortunes around. The amount of that loan package was $23.6 billion, the company was Ford Motor Company, and it was important enough to Ford CEO Alan Mulally and Chairman Bill Ford Jr that the collateral for the loan included Ford’s Blue Oval logo, along with the Mustang and F-150 nameplates.

While VW isn’t mortgaging the company the way Ford did (VW today is in much sounder financial shape than FoMoCo was in 2006), its upcoming negotiations with its banks is about more than just a diversified portfolio of funding tools.

Ronnie Schreiber
Ronnie Schreiber

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, the original 3D car site.

More by Ronnie Schreiber

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 10 comments
  • ScarecrowRepair ScarecrowRepair on Nov 16, 2015

    I wonder ....... Suppose this diesel emissions scandal spreads to so many diesels that diesel vehicles disappear for all practical purposes. Suppose governments realize this isn't one single automaker they can harass and pick on, but an entire industry, and so they decide to back off the fines and come to some face-saving resolution that leaves the cheating diesels on the road with just enough changes to make it look like something has been done. In other words, at this point VW could be governments' best ally in finding other cheating diesels.

  • Jasper2 Jasper2 on Nov 17, 2015

    The various governments of the world would do well by granting VW (Very Winterkorn) a one time pass on the diesel & co2 irregularities plus a huge fine since I don’t think there is a “fix” for the diesel issue or VW would have implemented the “fix” way before being asked to do so. To not take this approach will result in severe financial damage beyond the immediate participants.

    • RideHeight RideHeight on Nov 17, 2015

      VW has got to be loving ISIS and the hordes of "refugees" right now. Old Europe ain't got time for no farty cars.

  • Jeff Self driving cars are not ready for prime time.
  • Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
  • 28-Cars-Later " Electrek recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue. "Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
  • AMcA My theory is that that when the Big 3 gave away the store to the UAW in the last contract, there was a side deal in which the UAW promised to go after the non-organized transplant plants. Even the UAW understands that if the wage differential gets too high it's gonna kill the golden goose.
  • MKizzy Why else does range matter? Because in the EV advocate's dream scenario of a post-ICE future, the average multi-car household will find itself with more EVs in their garages and driveways than places to plug them in or the capacity to charge then all at once without significant electrical upgrades. Unless each vehicle has enough range to allow for multiple days without plugging in, fighting over charging access in multi-EV households will be right up there with finances for causes of domestic strife.
Next