May 2015 Was GM's Best Month Since 2008, Pickup Trucks Just As Important Now As Then

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

General Motors increased their share of America’s full-size pickup truck market from 35.5% in May 2014 to 38.1% in May 2015.

Grabbing hold of an opportunity presented by Ford’s F-150 supply constraints and consequent 10% overall F-Series decline, U.S. sales of the Chevrolet Silverado jumped 11%; GMC Sierra sales increased 4%. The full-size pickup truck market was up just 1.1%, year-over-year.

With such strong Silverado sales and modest Sierra improvement, May 2015 became the eighth month out of the last ten – and the third month this year – in which GM’s full-size trucks combined to outsell the Ford F-Series. Year-to-date, they lead the Ford by 4,497 units.

Growth from the company’s pickup trucks was essential last month as large sections of GM’s lineup faced sharply declining sales. The whole car division slid 13%, a loss of more than 14,000 sales. GM’s six full-size, truck-based SUVs plunged 19% compared with May 2014, a decrease of 4,609 sales. By way of the fleet-only Chevrolet Captiva Sport’s disappearance, GM lost 6,202 sales, year-over-year. GM’s three commercial vans combined for a severe 33% decline, equal to 4,544 fewer sales from the Express, Savana, and City Express.

Yet GM’s total volume increased 3% and the automaker’s market share grew marginally from 17.7% in May 2014 to 17.9% in May 2015. Not since August 2008 has GM’s monthly U.S. volume been this high.

But there are a number of significant differences between August of seven years ago and May of this year. In the former, you were trying to learn the words to Paper Planes, and just before August 2008 sales figures were released, society as a whole was learning who Sarah Palin is. And 15% of GM’s 307,285 U.S. sales were produced by dead brands: Pontiac, Saturn, and Saab.

Rather than learning song lyrics in May 2015, you were trying to figure out what a subcompact crossover really is and trying to figure out how to say farewell to David Letterman.

Yet some other factors haven’t been so severely altered. In August 2008, GM sold 85,953 pickup trucks, 28% of the company’s total volume. GM pickup truck sales in May 2015 totalled 82,361 units, or – you guessed it – 28% of the company’s total volume. (As an aside, GM owned 24.6% of the U.S. auto market in August 2008.)

Of course, full-size pickups aren’t the only products deserving of credit for propping up General Motors in May. Indeed, midsize pickup trucks did their fair share, too.

The Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon, launched last fall, were nonexistent at this time a year ago but added 11,782 sales to the GM tally in May 2015. For this second-generation Colorado, it was the best month yet and a continuation of a consistent upward trend. For its Canyon twin, May was similarly the best month yet; 15% better than the previous peak in February.

The midsize truck twins and full-size truck twins therefore added 17,387 more sales to GM’s bottom line in May 2015, a month in which the automaker’s other products combined for an 8,534-unit, 3.9% loss.

Other models contributing to GM’s growth in May 2015, modestly or meaningfully, include the Buick Enclave, Buick Encore, Cadillac ELR, Cadillac Escalade ESV, Cadillac SRX, Chevrolet Corvette, Chevrolet Malibu, Chevrolet Sonic, Chevrolet City Express, Chevrolet Equinox, Chevrolet Traverse, Chevrolet Trax, GMC Acadia, and GMC Terrain.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
16 of 67 comments
  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Jun 16, 2015

    I do agree with much of what Tresmonos stated. I also believe that Ford is also facing other challenges with the new aluminium f-150, as I've been watching as close as I can what's going on with the vehicle. I do believe that Ford will not make up for the lost sales as the new F-150 will not be as popular as the older one. This is primarily due to it's newness and acceptance by the pickup buying public. Many of the people that are attracted to Ford will buy a GM pickup as an alternative over a Ram. Ford will lose some loyalty to GM and get will not have this for a decade or two. Add to the mix the Colorado Canyon and this really opens up the difference between GM and Ford. Irrespective of the dumbass comments regarding midsizers that are dispersed on these American orientated sites the Colorado Canyon are raking in the cash for GM, probably with better profits than their full size GM counterparts. Ford, even with a supply of chassis frames will take some doing to overcome GMs current position. With the up and coming Titan and even the Tacoma, will pressure Ford more so than GM because of GMs recent pickup sales improvement. If the Taco can be as refined as the Colorado Canyon this will pressure some of the 1/2 ton V6 sales. The Titan XD will stagnate HD growth as well. With the aluminium HDs coming out I do believe some of the problems encountered by the aluminium F-150 will present itself with them. A Titan XD with a 5 litre Cummins will hit the sweet spot with many who want to tow relatively large trailers. The Titan will take some of the "SUV" type HD customers. I hope the Tundra comes up with a XD style pickup with a decent diesel as well. This would then have a much larger impact on the traditional HD manufacturers.

    • See 3 previous
    • Bball40dtw Bball40dtw on Jun 16, 2015

      @RobertRyan I never said it was hurting them. The GMTKXX is the most profitable thing GM builds though.

  • APaGttH APaGttH on Jun 16, 2015

    So lets recap. When GM ramped up production on GMT900 during the last refresh, they were doomed because they were channel stuffing to hide bad numbers, and the predictions from the B&B is those 2013 trucks would finally be sold through in 2015, after GMs second bankruptcy, at 50 cents on the dollar. Then GM was doomed because no one wanted the next generation GMT-900 because sales were weak, and the prices were too high, and Ford would destroy them. So they were doomed. Now the B&B is saying GM is doomed because they are selling too many pickup trucks and gaining market share because the F-150 is production constrained, and Bob the contractor needs a new truck. So now GM is doomed because they are "dependent" on selling trucks, look at their car business. Never mind that Timothy Cain posted how car sales continue to decline across the entire market as a percentage of overall sales. Gee? Why is that? Could it be that gas is cheap and there is a growing construction boom across the country and the predicted regional recession (yours truly included) in the oil patches hasn't materialized (which isn't to say it is happy times)? Don't these events usually create more truck sales from both consumers and commercial buyers? Isn't Toyota Tundra and Tacoma sales also up up up - along with RAM? Isn't Honda getting ready to release a new Ridgeline? Didn't we cross over the point where more CUVs/SUVs are being sold than sedans as an industry whole about 18 months ago? Nothing to see here people -- GMs line up is far more diversified with stronger products outside of trucks than it was in 2007, and it is four brands lighter.

    • See 9 previous
    • Scoutdude Scoutdude on Jun 17, 2015

      @ Lou you are correct, the upfitting equipment is another reason that many fleets are brand loyal the savings can really add up if they are able to directly transfer the equipment to the new truck.

  • Duke Woolworth Weight 4800# as I recall.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X '19 Nissan Frontier @78000 miles has been oil changes ( eng/ diffs/ tranny/ transfer). Still on original brakes and second set of tires.
  • ChristianWimmer I have a 2018 Mercedes A250 with almost 80,000 km on the clock and a vintage ‘89 Mercedes 500SL R129 with almost 300,000 km.The A250 has had zero issues but the yearly servicing costs are typically expensive from this brand - as expected. Basic yearly service costs around 400 Euros whereas a more comprehensive servicing with new brake pads, spark plugs plus TÜV etc. is in the 1000+ Euro region.The 500SL servicing costs were expensive when it was serviced at a Benz dealer, but they won’t touch this classic anymore. I have it serviced by a mechanic from another Benz dealership who also owns an R129 300SL-24 and he’ll do basic maintenance on it for a mere 150 Euros. I only drive the 500SL about 2000 km a year so running costs are low although the fuel costs are insane here. The 500SL has had two previous owners with full service history. It’s been a reliable car according to the records. The roof folding mechanism needs so adjusting and oiling from time to time but that’s normal.
  • Theflyersfan I wonder how many people recalled these after watching EuroCrash. There's someone one street over that has a similar yellow one of these, and you can tell he loves that car. It was just a tough sell - too expensive, way too heavy, zero passenger space, limited cargo bed, but for a chunk of the population, looked awesome. This was always meant to be a one and done car. Hopefully some are still running 20 years from now so we have a "remember when?" moment with them.
  • Lorenzo A friend bought one of these new. Six months later he traded it in for a Chrysler PT Cruiser. He already had a 1998 Corvette, so I thought he just wanted more passenger space. It turned out someone broke into the SSR and stole $1500 of tools, without even breaking the lock. He figured nobody breaks into a PT Cruiser, but he had a custom trunk lock installed.
Next