Wells Fargo Places Cap On Subprime Loans

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

Wells Fargo will rein in its subprime lending business, limiting subprime car loans to 10 percent of auto loans it originates. According to the New York Times, the move comes amid concerns that the market for subprime car loans is expanding too quickly.

While the paper’s Dealbook section notes that Wells Fargo has a strong reputation for managing risk, the move to limit subprime auto loans also sends a signal that the subprime auto loan market has become too risky. Concerns have previously been raised regarding lax underwriting practices and increasingly long loan terms driven by a demand in securities backed by subprime auto loans.

According to Dealbook, the 10 percent figure is in line with how many subprime loans are originated by Wells Fargo compared to prime loans. But the move comes as increasingly longer terms become the norm in the subprime space, since even repossessing a car and re-selling it is often insufficient to recoup the losses on a loan with a term of 84 months.

The recent jump in new car sales is also cited as another factor behind the decision. During the recession of 2008, new car sales plummeted, leading to a diminished supply of used vehicles in 2012 and beyond. The result was a significant spike in prices of used cars, which enabled lenders to reap higher profits when originating used car loans. But the record sales of new cars in 2013 and 2014 will inevitably lead to a glut of used cars, which should further depress used car prices (or return them to an appropriate level, depending on one’s perspective). The first crop of cars from this time period should enter the market next year, and Wells Fargo’s move could be seen as a pre-emptive move to hedge against this event.

Another theory that hasn’t been explored yet is the 7th anniversary of the Great Financial Crisis. This is a significant milestone, since it will allow the first crop of individuals who suffered bankruptcies or other black marks on their credit report to get a fresh start and have those blemishes erased from their files. That means that subprime financing will no longer be absolutely necessary for them. A new car dealer may be willing to give them a loan at a lower interest rate for something new and shiny. If that happens, then expect to see demand for subprime loans on used vehicles wither, as America’s insatiable desire for new vehicles is fueled even further.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 19 comments
  • John John on Mar 02, 2015

    Eh - risk averse? Does anyone recall Wells Fargo had to be BAILED OUT during the great financial crisis, due to subprime lending, or it would have disappeared? Also, it was one of the last of the big banks to repay it's bailout loan? If subprime auto loans are making Wells Fargo nervous, I suspect they are really, really bad news.

  • 87 Morgan 87 Morgan on Mar 03, 2015

    WF, at the time of the bailout requested to be left out of the entire process as they did not need the funds. They were however advised they had to TARP funds. This is documented in Tim Rattners book extensively. The CEO of the time at WF, the name eludes me, was understandably pissed they were being lumped into the same group as Citi, BofA, Lehmann Etal. As for Sub Prime Auto lending, this will not even be a blip on the radar, in fact may help some other lenders shore up their sub prime business as WF typically on bought the 'best of the worst' so to speak. I would bet the reason has a lot to do with the cross sell opportunities that exist within the FICO band of Sub prime and a decision was made the efforts were not worth the reward. WF's primary goal, when I worked for them, was the cross sell. Move every customer to checking account with two other products attached (mtg, heloc, car note, debit/credit card, investments account etc). These are very profitable customers for them and generally have a low churn.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next