February 2015 Full-Size Pickup Truck Sales Up 8%: GM Gains Plenty Of Market Share

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain
february 2015 full size pickup truck sales up 8 gm gains plenty of market share

One year ago, when we began tracking the monthly market share movement in America’s full-size pickup truck sector, General Motors had just seen its February market share fall from 39% in February 2013 to 35% one year later. Their trucks were new, but GM’s volume wasn’t matching the heavily incentivized sales production of their predecessors.

The story is turned on its head one year later, as Ford’s transition into a new F-Series lineup has caused a slight slowdown in a booming category. Full-size truck volume jumped 8% in February 2015, but F-Series sales slid 1%. GM, on the other hand, reported 8811 more Chevrolet Silverado sales this February than last along with more than 900 extra GMC Sierra sales.

Thus, at the expense of Ford (which lost more than three percentage points of market share), Ram (which lost three-tenths of a percentage point), and Nissan (which also lost three-tenths of a percentage point), GM’s market share in America’s full-size pickup category grew to 38.6% in February 2015 from 35% a year ago, and from 34.6% a month ago.

TruckFeb.2015Feb.2014%Change2 mos.20152 mos.2014%ChangeFord F-Series55,23655,882-1.2%109,606102,4187.0%Chevrolet Silverado45,39536,58424.1%81,50165,51024.4%Ram P/U31,29829,3036.8%59,91654,37410.2%GMC Sierra15,15714,2326.5%27,77825,3509.6%Toyota Tundra9,0527,92314.3%17,24915,8139.1%Nissan Titan8161,117-26.9%1,5902,004-20.7%—— —————Total156,954145,0418.2%297,640265,46912.1%

Although Ram volume improved in February – the 58th consecutive month of YOY Ram P/U growth – the FCA pickup’s market share declined on a YOY basis for the second consecutive month. The Ram’s impressive growth in the first two months of 2015 simply isn’t quite as impressive as the growth in the overall segment. February was the first month since August that the Ram wasn’t America’s third-best-selling vehicle.

TruckFeb.2015ShareFeb.2014Share2 mos. 2015Share2 mos. 2014ShareFord F-Series35.2%38.5%36.8%38.6%Chevrolet Silverado/GMC Sierra38.6%35.0%36.7%34.2%Ram P/U19.9%20.2%20.1%20.5%Toyota Tundra5.8%5.5%5.8%6.0%Nissan Titan0.5%0.8%0.5%0.8%—————Full-Size Share Of Total Pickup Truck Market85.0%89.0%84.8%88.7%Full-Size Pickup Share Of Total Industry 12.5%12.1%12.3%12.0%

February was also a return to form for the combined GM twins. Together, the Silverado and Sierra outsold the F-Series in each of 2014’s final five months. Ford leaped ahead by a wide margin in January, but its year-to-date lead over the GM pair is now down to 337 units heading into March.

Results to this point aren’t meaningless. Nearly 300,000 full-size pickup trucks were sold in January and February. But after January’s low-volume potential and a February that was brought below forecasts because of winter weather, March’s end to the first-quarter will give us more to work with. In 2012, March was the highest-volume month for new vehicle sales volume. It was the second-highest-volume month in 2013 and the third-highest-volume month for auto sales last year.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures.

Comments
Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Mar 04, 2015

    GM's new truck platforms has been slowly accepted in the marketplace. They are basically making up lost ground from the year before. A lot of guys thought the Silverado was too retro and many don't like the very existence of the Sierra. Chevy also gets hurt by not having a Denali grade package. The High Country is basically mid level bling when compared to Ford and Ram's lineup. Ram was due to slow down in sales due to approaching max capacity. Ford obviously will see a loss of market share due to the change over to the aluminum F150. You can also factor in those who are not early adopters and will wait and watch these new trucks for flaws and new vehicle gremlins.

  • Alan The Prado shouldn't have the Landcruiser name attached. It isn't a Landcruiser as much as a Tacoma or 4 Runner or a FJ Cruiser. Toyota have used the Landcruiser name as a marketing exercise for years. In Australia the RAV4 even had Landcruiser attached years ago! The Toyota Landcruiser is the Landcruiser, not a tarted up Tacoma wagon.Here a GX Prado cost about $61k before on roads, this is about $41k USD. This is a 2.8 diesel 4x4 with all the off road tricky stuff, plus AC, power windows, etc. I'm wondering if Toyota will perform the Nissan Armada treatment on it and debase the Prado. The Patrol here is actually as capable and possibly more capable than the Landcruiser off road (according to some reviews). The Armada was 'muricanised and the off road ability was reduced a lot. Who ever heard of a 2 wheel drive Patrol.Does the US need the Prado? Why not. Another option to choose from built by Toyota that is overpriced and uses old tech.My sister had a Prado Grande, I didn't think much of it. It was narrow inside and not that comfortable. Her Grand Cherokee was more comfortable and now her Toureg is even more comfortable, but you can still feel the road in the seat of your pants and ears.
  • Jeffrey No tis vehicle doen't need to come to America. The market if flooded in this segment what we need are fun affordable vehicles.
  • Nrd515 I don't really see the point of annual inspections, especially when the car is under 3 years (warranty) old. Inspections should be safety related, ONLY, none of the nonsensical CA ARB rules that end up being something like, "Your air intake doesn't have an ARB sticker on it, so you have to remove it and buy one just like it that does have the ARB sticker on it!". If the car or whatever isn't puking smoke out of it, and it doesn't make your eyes water, like an old Chevy Bel-Air I was behind on Wed did, it's fine. I was stuck in traffic behind that old car, and wow, the gasoline smell was super potent. It was in nice shape, but man, it was choking me. I was amused by the 80 something old guy driving it, he even had a hat with a feather in it, THE sign of someone you don't want to be driving anywhere near you.
  • Lou_BC "15mpg EPA" The 2023 ZR2 Colorado is supposed to be 16 mpg
  • ToolGuy "The more aerodynamic, organic shape of the Mark VIII meant ride height was slightly lower than before at 53.6 inches, over 54.2” for the Mark VII."• I am not sure that ride height means what you think it means.Elaboration: There is some possible disagreement about what "ride height" refers to. Some say ground clearance, some say H point (without calling it that), some say something else. But none of those people would use a number of over 4 feet for a stock Mark anything.Then you go on to use it correctly ("A notable advancement in the Mark VIII’s suspension was programming to lower the ride height slightly at high speeds, which assisted fuel economy via improved aerodynamics.") so what do I know. Plus, I ended a sentence with a preposition. 🙂
Next