By on March 27, 2015

2013 Ford C-MAX Energi Plug-In Hybrid, Exterior, Rear 3/4 View, Picture Courtesy of Alex L. Dykes

According to the Environmental Protection Agency, the auto industry outperformed national greenhouse gas emissions standards for a second consecutive year.

For MY 2013 vehicles, the average GHG emission came to 12 grams per mile — 1.4 miles per gallon — better than what was required by the 2013 standard. The EPA also found that MY 2013 vehicles delivered an all-time high average fuel economy of 24.1 mpg, while CO2 emissions remain at a record low. The agency notes that automakers are achieving these gains through the use of optional flexibilities, including fleet averaging and improved air conditioning systems.

The GHG standards cover light-duty vehicles made from MY 2012 through MY 2025, and are expected to save 12 billion barrels of oil while cutting 6 billion metric tons of greenhouse gases “over the lifetimes of vehicles sold in these years.” The EPA says most manufacturers — “representing more than 99% of sales” — met both 2012 and 2013 standards, while the rest have “several more years to come into compliance.”

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

16 Comments on “EPA: Industry Exceeded National GHG Emissions Standards In 2013...”

  • avatar

    Awesome. Good to hear positive news once in a while.

    • 0 avatar

      I was just thinking it means we’re losing displacement a little faster than we need to.

      Also, the chrome trim only along the bottom of the C-Max is awkward.

      • 0 avatar

        I don’t like it. That’s another reason to buy the SE over the SEL. The SE doesn’t have that chrome strip. The proper way to buy the C-Max in is SE with 203A and the cold weather package. It gets you heated seats, mirrors, power liftgate, nav, ambient lighting, reverse sensing system, and puddle lamps. Conslaw and I have the same build in different colors. I’d like leather, but I wasn’t going to shell out an extra $3000 for it in order to get it and a power liftgate.

  • avatar

    There is no practical way to figure this out, but I wonder how the real-world mileage average would compare to the EPA Standards, what with the continuing increase in the number of “built to test” turbo 4-cylinder engines?

  • avatar

    The gains in Pickup truck emissions/MPG’s must be helping quite a bit – considering their sales volumes.

  • avatar

    Is that 24.1 MPG with the old standards, new standards, or some completely different standards? Also, does it include multipliers for E85 capable vehicles and electric vehicles? Bottom line (I suppose): if you bought a new vehicle that achieved 21 MPG in the real world would you be improving or hurting the national average?

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • ajla: California’s electricity situation is uniquely sh*tty and federalizing the grid is very unlikely....
  • Jeff S: @MrIcky–Calling people who don’t agree with them liberals is a way of deflecting any meaningful...
  • Art Vandelay: Oh good…I have the Canadian Take on US politics so I can sleep well. Just like Canadians that...
  • Lorenzo: There are other materials besides lithium that will be in short supply. But that’s not the delimiter....
  • Art Vandelay: Well duh…they were mostly peaceful

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber