Ethanol Advocates Conduct Pre-Election Ad Campaign Blitz
In less than a week, the B&B will head out to the polls to decide the direction the United States will take for the next two years.
Big Ethanol, too, is interested in the direction taken.
AutoblogGreen reports Fuels America, an advocate for the fuel source, is conducting a major advertising campaign to persuade the Obama administration and the Environmental Protection Agency not to make cuts into the Renewable Fuels Standard, the mandate that makes E85, E10 and every other blend possible.
The blitz — which kicked-off last week — is being carried through Beltway media such as Politico, RollCall and WTOP-FM, and will continue until November 5.
Seattle-based writer, blogger, and photographer for many a publication. Born in Louisville. Raised in Kansas. Where I lay my head is home.
More by Cameron Aubernon
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Rrp138519787 If Jeep wanted to re-introduce the Wagoneer name, they just should have named the Grand Cherokee L the Wagoneer instead, and done a little bit more styling differentiation. They could have done a super deluxe version as the Grand Wagoneer. But all Wagoneers would have been the three row version as the primary product differentiation. And would cause less confusion for consumers overall.
- D The only people who have TDS, which I assume is Trump Derangement Syndrome, are the MAGOTS who have been brainwashed to love him. They Know Not What They Do.
- The Oracle The updated Model Y beat this copy to market.
- ToolGuy™ I respect what the seller is doing, but this vehicle is not for me. (Seller doesn't care, has two people lined up already.)
- SCE to AUX How well does the rear camera work in the rain and snow?
Comments
Join the conversation
Ethanol has no effect on our mideast policies and no meaningful impact on our "energy independence." There has been, however, a massive, government-mandated transfer of wealth from people who purchase food and fuel to agribusiness. The graft is so massive it has caused politicians from both parties to climb into bed together in a bipartisan orgy of greed. People who defend these policies are either financially connected to the theft and drizzling out arguments like corn syrup or they are the fools who are licking it up.
Looks like I came too late for the "discussion," which was probably a good thing, since I'm not good enough with facts, figures and sources to adequately defend my position. All I can really say is this: I'd like anyone to find me a more dependable source of _renewable_ energy that's here_and_now. Thank you to Pch101 and anyone who shares the same view for getting the facts straight.