Schaeffler: Run On Two Cylinders Instead of Three

Cylinder deactivation is available on a handful of Chrysler and General Motors V8s, as well as Honda V6s, cutting power to a set of cylinders in order to boost efficiency in the short-term. However, one supplier wants to take this further by using the technology on turbocharged three-cylinder motors, deactivating one cylinder while the other two do all of the work.
Ward’s Auto reports German supplier Schaeffler, which brought the switchable valve lifters to the Chrysler and GM cylinder-deactivation programs, is looking to help its customers develop three all-new three-cylinder engines that will put aside one cylinder under certain conditions. Manager of valvetrain systems David Kehr hopes the first prototype will be available for driving in six months, and believes the tech is ready for small engines thanks to advances in NVH:
It will make sense when the consumers don’t even know it’s there. To tell someone you’re going to do it, they’d probably have a lot of apprehension. But even with all the cylinder-deactivation applications that have hit the market, I would argue most people don’t even know it’s there.
The supplier plans to use electronic “rolling” cylinder deactivation, changing the amount of cylinders in play — and which ones — based on driver behavior. In turn, this would boost fuel economy over the long-term, even though it would also add cost to the engines that receive the tech. Thus, the focus will be on three-cylinder units as the cost of adding cylinder deactivation is much lower than even on a four-cylinder unit, let alone using ICEs with electric power in a hybrid configuration to do the same thing.
Comments
Join the conversation
As GM owners how their cylinder deactivation is working out for them on the LS V8's, it's caused all sorts issues resulting in complete engine rebuilds or replacements. All to meet some ridiculous CAFE quote and "save" the consumer a few dollars a month in gas, never mind the thousands in repair bills. Oil starvation is the main issue. Buy hey, they got 19mpg on the highway instead of 18.2 mpg, so it was totally worth it. Many people buy kits that disable this feature through the ECM because they don't want to have to buy a new engine at 60k miles. It also causes all sorts of bad oil consumption issues.
This approach to increased efficiency, a relatively minor change to the engine for a minor increase in efficiency which presents many problems, will fail. How about throwing money into developing wave-disk generators for electric engines, or the liquid piston X1 design? High mpg requirements require new technology.
A common method of cylinder deactivation is practiced by some of the local yokels, living in my area, who drive vehicles powered by V7 engines. This is an engine that left the factory as a V8 but was given only cursory maintenance over the years. These engines are quite popular in 20 year old pickup trucks and Camaros around the trailer parks.
I had cylinder deactivation on a MB V8 E430 Sport. It caused more problems for that MB money-pit. I personally want all my cylinders working at all times... R.I.P E430