Mitsubishi Vans Are A Delica-te Matter In Canada

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler
mitsubishi vans are a delica te matter in canada

For the first and possibly last time ever, the Mitsubishi Delica was a front page story in a national newspaper, with The Globe and Mail reporting on the “backlash” resulting from these “quirky” cars.

The Globe, which is widely regarded as Canada’s paper of record, chose to put the venerable van on page A1, ahead of stories about Syria, ISIS, Boko Haram, Libya and the lack of new manual station wagons.

According to the paper, the Mitsubishi Delica is raising ire, to the point where

“…various provinces and organizations across the country mobilizing to prevent even more of the vehicles from washing up on Canada’s shores…Concerned by the rising number of right-wheel-drive imports, ICBC analyzed crashes involving vehicles like the Delica. In 2009, the agency published its alarming findings: Right-wheel drive vehicles were 40 per cent more likely to be in a crash, and 56 per cent more likely to cause one, than left-wheel-drive vehicles. The driver’s position is believed to make everyday manoeuvres – such as pulling away from a curb or making a left-hand turn – much more dangerous.”

Granted, there are legitimate safety concerns regarding right-hand drive vehicles. For one, the positioning of the headlights must be modified. If they aren’t, then they tend to be angled right into oncoming traffic, which presents an obvious safety hazard.

But there’s also the unspoken fact that many right-hand drive vehicles are performance models like the Nissan Skyline GT-R and Toyota Celica GT-Four. They tend to be purchased by young, testosterone-addled males who are likely to drive them at dangerous speeds on public roads. This is likely to contribute to the alarming crash rates, and a reason why Quebec and Prince Edward Island moved to ban right-hand drive cars earlier in the decade.

There is also pressure from dealer groups and other parties who stand to lose out economically. Although BC’s government-regulated insurer has asked for changes in the rules, they don’t appear to be coming any time soon

Mark Francis, an ICBC manager of provincial vehicle registration who is on a national working group on the issue, says they asked Transport Canada to increase the number of years before a vehicle can be imported from 15 to 25. That number – which would be in line with the United States – would effectively kill the importation of modern Delicas by making it no longer economic for Japanese exporters to warehouse them.

“We’re taking their junk, as we view it,” Mr. Francis says. He adds, however, that the lack of any high-profile crashes involving these vehicles means there’s little incentive to act. “We’re not expecting them to do anything in the near future.”

Surely, the government has a whole host of priorities that are far higher than restricting what a niche group of enthusiasts can import into the country, right?

Join the conversation
2 of 67 comments
  • Wstarvingteacher Wstarvingteacher on Jul 29, 2014

    I would think someone is missing out on a profit. Should be easy to make conversions to LHD. Don't know that the bargain seekers would be willing to spend what it took. IIRC these and a similar Toyota were valued in both Mongolia and Siberia. If it's tough enough for that I'm sure it would do fine on my little farm. The people I know who drove Mitsubishi trucks or SUVs got a lot of miles out of them. This van appeals to me.

  • Brandloyalty Brandloyalty on Jul 29, 2014

    I'm sure the car dealers association of British Columbia is behind this, fronted by their friends in the current provincial government. Say about 10 years ago, you had to pay full provincial taxes when you bought a used vehicle from a dealer, but only partial taxes on a private sale. Then the provincial government replaced the provincial taxation with the HST, which was a federal-government backed tax setup, and which applied to just about everything including private vehicle purchases. The public revolted and got the HST removed and the old taxing reinstated. Except that thanks to the efforts of the car dealers, the one item that retained full taxation was private car sales. It did not go back to the original situation of only partial taxation. This glaring inconsistency demonstrated the power of the car dealers. People have commented on the 15-year age level for JDM's. I believe this has less to do with local regulations and more to do with cars in Japan being required to be less than 15 years old. This, and the Japanese tendency to look after things, means there are lots of perfectly good vehicles available for export all over the world. So many that JDM's sell for about half what an equivalent left-drive would cost, and enough that many people are willing to put up with sitting on the "wrong" side. Whether ICBC suffers losses insuring JDM's is up to ICBC. They can charge whatever it takes to insure these vehicles. Factor that into purchase prices and people are free to decide whether to buy JDM's. JDM vehicle types include vans, from simple to executive-jet appointmented versions with 4wd, low ranges and turbo diesels; Kei cars from tiny fake VW microbus' to 2-seat convertibles; cars from hot sports cars to plain sedans; minvans like the original Toyota minvan; utility trucks like flatbeds, cube vans, 4-door flatbeds and some with 4wd; and various off-road heavy duty suv's with all imaginable trimmings.

  • Bullnuke Well, production cuts may be due to transport-to-market issues. The MV Fremantle Highway is in a Rotterdam shipyard undergoing repairs from the last shipment of VW products (along with BMW and others) and to adequately fireproof it. The word in the shipping community is that insurance necessary for ships moving EVs is under serious review.
  • Frank Wait until the gov't subsidies end, you aint seen nothing yet. Ive been "on the floor" when they pulled them for fuel efficient vehicles back during/after the recession and the sales of those cars stopped dead in their tracks
  • Vulpine The issue is really stupidly simple; both names can be taken the wrong way by those who enjoy abusing language. Implying a certain piece of anatomy is a sign of juvenile idiocy which is what triggered the original name-change. The problem was not caused by the company but rather by those who continuously ridiculed the original name for the purpose of VERY low-brow humor.
  • Sgeffe There's someone around where I live who has a recent WRX-STi, but the few times I've been behind this guy, he's always driving right at the underposted arbitrary numbers that some politician pulled out of their backside and slapped on a sign! With no gendarmes or schoolkids present! Haven't been behind this driver on the freeway, but my guess is that he does the left lane police thing with the best of 'em!What's the point of buying such a vehicle if you're never going to exceed a speed limit? (And I've pondered that whilst in line in the left lane at 63mph behind a couple of Accord V6s, as well as an AMG E-Klasse!)
  • Mebgardner I'm not the market for a malleable Tuner / Track model, so I dont know: If you are considering a purchase of one of these, do you consider the Insurance Cost Of Ownership aspect? Or just screw it, I'm gonna buy it no matter.The WRX is at the top of the Insurance Cost pole for tuner models, is why I ask.