Moody's: Underwriting Standards, Borrower Credit Declining

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

The global outlook for Auto Back Securities (ABS) is steady – except in North America, where underwriting standards and borrower credit are slipping.

The latest news comes from ratings agency Moody’s, which issued a new report on the popular investment vehicle. Sanjay Wahi, Vice President and Senior Analyst, stated

“Globally, auto loan ABS pools will continue to consist primarily of loans to prime borrowers. The exception is the US, which has a sizable market for securitizations backed predominantly by near-prime and subprime borrowers.”

Moody’s has long been bearish on subprime ABS in the United States. Both Europe and China are cited as having safer loan pools due to stronger underwriting standards and more rigorous loan terms. But the United States is unique in the predominance of subprime loans, perhaps in part due to the demand for specific sections of ABS (called “tranches” in the investment world) which are comprised of the riskiest subprime loans.

ABS has become a popular security in recent years, with subprime driving much of its growth. With fixed income yields at historic lows, investors are hungry for securities that will provide decent returns. ABS, particularly the subprime tranches of these securities, are among the few products that can provide them – their greater risk profile entails the potential for a higher return. Some have argued that the demand for ABS has led to the growth in subprime financing, with looser underwriting standards (in some cases, they are laughably lax) and a number of OEM captive financing arms that are all too willing to finance buyers with poor credit so that they can “move the metal”. Traditionally, the thinking has been that most buyers are sufficiently trustworthy enough to make their payments on time, and able to offset the few delinquent buyers – but that trend appears to be reversing as of late, with delinquencies on the rise. And if the latest trends outlined by Moody’s are any indication, this isn’t likely to reverse.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
8 of 90 comments
  • Point Given Point Given on Jun 11, 2014

    I think the risk is lessening on the sub prime loans thanks to a little bit of technology. Whenever we sell a sub-prime car it comes with a little GPS unit that the auto finance company can disable the car if you don't make your payments, and if they want to repossess it know exactly where it is. It makes a sub prime piece a bit more retrievable (and secure) and not being able to drive despite the car being in your driveway forces more people to make the payment in order to be able to drive. Someone like Carfinco, who sends out high interest loans (20%++) has a surprisingly small delinquency rate.

    • See 5 previous
    • Point Given Point Given on Jun 12, 2014

      @ajla I'm a fleet guy, I don't deal with subprime people at all and am only vaguely aware of what goes on downstairs. That said, I'd bet money it's in the contract somewhere as a term and condition. However, mr. customer just blindly signs 99% of the time (bet it's 99.9% of the time with a subprime cust). Payment is this, sign here kinda thing. Should a subprime person pay off the car I'd think they'd shut it off and forget about it. I can't imagine too many of those loans are ever completely paid off though. Possible that the finance company would call and arrange to remove it. When units are traded in with such devices we do take them out. Liability follows the installer, which we outsource to an independent shop(both cost and liability reasons), or the product manufacturer. Standard risk management practices on a non-auto manufacturer product.

  • Hybridkiller Hybridkiller on Jun 11, 2014

    "The global outlook for Auto Back Securities (ABS) is steady – except in North America, where underwriting standards and borrower credit are slipping." Derek, considering the context and tone of the article I'm assuming you were being serious, and this was not an attempt to be clever/witty/whatever (if it was, it's much more misleading than amusing). Especially since it is unlikely that most readers here are fluent in investment-speak. ABS = Asset Backed Security If you're going to address matters with such a broad scope, please pay some attention to getting the terminology right.

  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
  • D Screw Tesla. There are millions of affordable EVs already in use and widely available. Commonly seen in Peachtree City, GA, and The Villages, FL, they are cheap, convenient, and fun. We just need more municipalities to accept them. If they'll allow AVs on the road, why not golf cars?
  • ChristianWimmer Best-looking current BMW in my opinion.
  • Analoggrotto Looks like a cheap Hyundai.
  • Honda1 It really does not matter. The way bidenomics is going nobody will be able to afford shyt.
Next