Car Reliability Stats Updated, Passat Problems Pinpointed

Michael Karesh
by Michael Karesh

Whenever we post about a Volkswagen, comments about reliability (or, more specifically, the lack of it) inevitably follow. So few will be surprised that, with the latest update to TrueDelta’s car reliability stats, the 2012 Passat again received subpar marks. Though the big sedan’s score is better than earlier, it remains considerably worse than most other 2012s. Digging through the repair reports, a common cause emerges. Ignition coils aren’t failing. Nor are window regulators. Instead, the most common problem for these cars happens to be rattles.

VAG certainly knows how to engineer a car without bits that squeak and jiggle. The far more complex new A6 and A7 have had hardly any problems so far, rattles or otherwise. So what happened with the new Passat? Don’t quickly blame the new Chattanooga plant: the “hencho en Mexico” 2012 Jetta is also prone to rattle. (Mysteriously, the 2011 Jetta fares better.)

These updated reliability stats cover owner experiences through the end of June 2012 (scores elsewhere are about 14 months behind). Among recently redesigned cars, the Passat is the exception rather than the rule. In addition to the A6 and A7, the FIAT 500, Honda Civic, Honda CR-V, Hyundai Accent, Hyundai Veloster, and Subaru Impreza are all doing well so far. Initial data for the 2013 Mazda CX-5 suggest it will be joining them. The Ford Focus isn’t among the best, but “about average” is an improvement over Fords redesigned a year or two earlier (Taurus, Fiesta, Explorer).

TrueDelta will update its car reliability stats again in November. The more people participate, the more models we can cover and the more precise these stats will be.

To view the updated repair trips per year stats:

Car Reliability Survey results

Michael Karesh operates truedelta.com, a provider of car reliability and pricing information.

Michael Karesh
Michael Karesh

Michael Karesh lives in West Bloomfield, Michigan, with his wife and three children. In 2003 he received a Ph.D. from the University of Chicago. While in Chicago he worked at the National Opinion Research Center, a leader in the field of survey research. For his doctoral thesis, he spent a year-and-a-half inside an automaker studying how and how well it understood consumers when developing new products. While pursuing the degree he taught consumer behavior and product development at Oakland University. Since 1999, he has contributed auto reviews to Epinions, where he is currently one of two people in charge of the autos section. Since earning the degree he has continued to care for his children (school, gymnastics, tae-kwan-do...) and write reviews for Epinions and, more recently, The Truth About Cars while developing TrueDelta, a vehicle reliability and price comparison site.

More by Michael Karesh

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 124 comments
  • Buck__wheat Buck__wheat on Feb 20, 2014

    I keep reading comments about who in their right mind would own a VW. I own a MKIV Jetta. So far it's at 140,000 miles, but has never failed to start, and never had a major issue aside from a window regulator. I've owned a number of VWs, racked up over 300,000 miles on some (a 5 cylinder Quantum and a VR6 GTI) and have never had an engine/turbo/transmission problem. Every vehicle that I've sold has been due to rust (this goes for all my cars, not just my VWs). Looking at rust warranties, VW's and Mini's rust warranty are 5 years longer than the next best one out there among low and mid-priced cars. I drive rental cars at least 200 days a year and have driven just about every manufacturer's car. I'm really not impressed with the vast majority of them and I'll include the current base Jetta in there. Few of them have the steering feel or tracking of VW's in my opinion (again excluding the base Jetta). Only when you get into cars in a higher price class do they seem to match/beat the damping and steering characteristics of my aging Jetta. The two rentals that come to mind are a Volvo S60 and a Cadillac CTS. VW also offers combinations of vehicles that no one else does. I was pretty excited to hear about the Acura TSX wagon coming to the States as an eventual replacement for my Jetta. Acura decided that people who drive wagons don't know how to operate a clutch pedal, so off the list that car came. So in a year or so, I'll be passing the Jetta down to my kids and buying another car. I'm looking around for station wagons, and see only about 6 of them out there. Add a stick shift and you're down to VW. The corrosion warranty and the TDI engine make it almost a forgone conclusion that I'll be buying another VW. I'm sure there will be some of the smarmy Honda and Toyota owners who will accuse me of being a VW PR rep working under cover, and I am only one data point, but I am a data point with well over 1,000,000 VW miles under my belt and a few hundred thousand miles of Ford ownership to my name. My experience is VW's stand out in paint, drivetrain, and interior material wear. They lag in rattles and in the electrical department, but they're nowhere near the level of crap that a lot of TTAC comments portend.

  • Noelleo2112 Noelleo2112 on Nov 10, 2016

    My kid just got a high mileage passat and paid way too much for it. A few google searches about the engine on this thing turns my stomach, a timing belt on one side and another whole timing chain on the other? Im hoping he keeps the old neon with the funny transmission, because it sounds like it will prove to be the more reliable car.

  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
Next