Chrysler Restarts Second Shift At Toledo, Says It Has New Cherokee's Drivetrain Software Patched

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

Chrysler announced Thursday that it will restart the second shift of workers assembling the all-new 2014 Jeep Cherokee at the Toledo Assembly Complex next Monday after a week of downtime spent upgrading the software for the SUV’s powertrain. Chrysler had idled the 500 workers, it said, because it had built a sufficient number of vehicles to launch and that it didn’t want to overwhelm delivery logistics, but it was clear from the fact that none of the built Cherokees were being shipped and that some of the idled workers were conducting lengthy test drives that quality control was a factor in the shutdown. Chrysler software and drivetrain engineers have been working on patches to the engine and transmission mapping software and the company says that it has made progress on the upgrade.

“As we continue to refine the vehicle’s powertrain software, we are implementing a plan that will allow us to make the required updates more quickly than anticipated, thereby making additional layoffs unnecessary at this time,” Chrysler spokeswoman Jodi Tinson said in a statement.

Chrysler has been holding back over 12,000 finished Cherokees before shipping them to dealers. That’s more than $300 million worth of Jeeps at retail prices.

Automotive News had reported that the software at issue regulates how the ZF designed and Chrysler built nine-speed automatic transmission interacts with the Cherokee’s innovative free-wheeling driveshaft and rear differential which is supposed to save fuel. Chrysler confirmed the issue in its statement on Thursday.

“This is the world’s first application of a highly technical nine-speed transmission; on top of that, it is being mated to two new engines and three complex 4×4 systems. As our senior management has stated many times before, we will only introduce a vehicle to consumers when we are completely satisfied,” the statement said.

The engines are Chrysler designs, the transmission was licensed from ZF and the trick disconnecting driveshaft is made by American Axle, and Chrysler had to develop software to integrate the components and control shifting patterns and four-wheel drive implementation for each of the drivetrain combinations.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 43 comments
  • Readallover Readallover on Sep 27, 2013

    I don`t understand why they would stop producing the trucks in the first place. If it is a software problem, would you not just reflash them when you discover the fix?

    • See 1 previous
    • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Sep 27, 2013

      @Kinosh Well, they DID say they have 12,000 of 'em waiting for upgrades. If it weren't football season, a single stadium lot should hold them all. OTOH, the traditional storage is dealer lots, with dealers selling them and then scheduling the upgrades in a recall and having dealers' grease monkeys do the upgrades. The emphasis on PR is killing tradition!

  • Zackman Zackman on Sep 27, 2013

    Ahhh... makes one pine for the days of yearly tune-ups. Re-gapping plugs, adjusting dwell, etc. NO WAY! I love computerized cars, for they have never been more reliable and economical. Besides, I don't work on them anymore, and I'm happy about that! I just keep them cleaned and well-maintained. This gives me confidence in Chrysler I haven't had since Iacocca's reign. Seems they are trying to do it right. It's one thing to function in a lab under controlled conditions, but beta-testing in the real world is a different animal. I wish them the best with this launch!

    • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Sep 27, 2013

      I'm with you, Zackman. No more busted knuckles. Besides, I can't even find the engine anymore, there's just this big plastic thing in the engine bay.

  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
  • JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
  • Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
  • JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
  • JLGOLDEN Our family bought a 2012 Murano AWD new, and enjoyed it for 280K before we sold it last month. CVT began slipping at 230K but it was worth fixing a clean, well-cared for car. As soon as we sold the 2012, I grabbed a new 2024 Murano before the body style and powertrain changes for 2025, and (as rumored) goes to 4-cyl turbo. Sure, the current Murano feels old-school, with interior switchgear and finishes akin to a 2010 Infiniti. That's not a bad thing! Feels solid, V6 sounds awesome, and the whole platform has been around long enough that future parts & service wont be an issue.
Next