Dan Akerson Wants a Big Raise, Washington Sugar Daddy Not Sure Yet, GM Says: Not True!
GM’s CEO Dan Akerson asked for a big raise. He thinks his work at GM is worth a paycheck of $11.1 million this year, up 20 percent from last year, Reuters reports, citing documents. The embarrassing part: Akerson and GM have to ask its white House sugar daddy for approval.
As part of GM’s government-funded bailout, the salaries of GM executives must be authorized by a special paymaster from the federal government. The request for a raise comes at an inopportune time.
Last month, the special paymaster faced strong criticism from the TARP Special Inspector General . The report said the government “continues to award excessive pay packages.” It also flogged executives who “continue to lack an appreciation for their extraordinary situations and fail to view themselves through the lenses of companies substantially owned by the U.S. Government.”
The report published the 2012 pay packages of executives of bailed-out companies and said:
“In stark contrast, the 2011 median household income of U.S. taxpayers who fund these companies was approximately $50,000.”
Akerson’s request for a pay raised is part of documents that were published a day before a U.S. House Oversight and Government Reform Committee would be looking into whether the U.S. Treasury has allowed excessive executive pay at companies aided by the Troubled Asset Relief Program.
Meanwhile in Germany, Volkswagen CEO Martin Winterkorn applied for, and received, a salary reduction. Based on Volkswagen’s record $29 billion profit, Winterkorn was entitled to a bonus that would have raised his 2012 remuneration to €20 million ($26 million.) Last week, Volkswagen’s supervisory board ruled that Winterkorn will be paid a total of 14.5 million euros ($19.17 million) for 2012 in fixed salary, bonuses and incentives, compared with 17.5 million a year earlier.
Winterkorn’s private taxi
A U.S. Treasury Department official said no determinations has yet been made for the 2013 compensation of GM execs. Once the government is out at GM, no more embarrassing requests for raises. Also, GM execs will get their jets back. This must be the most embarrassing part: While RenCen execs must fly commercial, Winterkorn has his private Airbus A319CJ, along with a fleet of Dassault Falcons.
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Damon Thomas Adding to the POSITIVES... It's a pretty fun car to mod
- GregLocock Two adjacent states in Australia have different attitudes to roadworthy inspections. In NSW they are annual. In Victoria they only occur at change of ownership. As you'd expect this leads to many people in Vic keeping their old car.So if the worrywarts are correct Victoria's roads would be full of beaten up cars and so have a high accident rate compared with NSW. Oh well, the stats don't agree.https://www.lhd.com.au/lhd-insights/australian-road-death-statistics/
- Lorenzo In Massachusetts, they used to require an inspection every 6 months, checking your brake lights, turn signals, horn, and headlight alignment, for two bucks.Now I get an "inspection" every two years in California, and all they check is the smog. MAYBE they notice the tire tread, squeaky brakes, or steering when they drive it into the bay, but all they check is the smog equipment and tailpipe emissions.For all they would know, the headlights, horn, and turn signals might not work, and the car has a "speed wobble" at 45 mph. AFAIK, they don't even check EVs.
- Not Tire shop mechanic tugging on my wheel after I complained of grinding noise didn’t catch that the ball joint was failing. Subsequently failed to prevent the catastrophic failure of the ball joint and separation of the steering knuckle from the car! I’ve never lived in a state that required annual inspection, but can’t say that having the requirement has any bearing on improving safety given my experience with mechanics…
- Mike978 Wow 700 days even with the recent car shortages.
Why not just pay Akerson to go away? I'm sure it'll be cheaper in the long run.
Bertel's not alone or new on this subject... Magazines have been running the "What's wrong with GM?" cover since the early 1980s. When Roger B. came in 1980 they had 46% market share; when he left they were at 35% and dropping fast. The real criminals aren't the CEO's (although I think Rick Wagoner should be in the CEO Protection Program he was so bad) but the potted plant board members who let this garbage go on for 30 years. NO ONE should still be on that board who was on prior to the bankruptcy; boards need to toss management when they're not hitting their marks instead of approving their bonuses. I'm a GMI graduate from 1990 (never worked at The General though) and I'm really happy they changed their name to Kettering University... at least Boss Kettering was a real engineer, not one of the worst management studies of all time like GM since 1970.