CAW May Try New Tactic Of Simultaneous Talks With Automakers

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

The CAW may abandon their tactic of using negotiations with one automaker as a precedent for other negotiations, and conduct simultaneous talks with Ford, Chrysler and General Motors.

The CAW is holding separate talks with the Big Three automakers in Toronto, and the union is staying mum about a possible “target automaker”, in the apparent hopes that the simultaneous talks are successful. The CAW’s contract expires at 11:59 P.M. on September 17th, and CAW President Ken Lewenza told Reuters that any decision regarding a target company would come at least five days beforehand.

The new tactic isn’t entirely unheard of; the UAW used the simultaneous negotiations move in 2009, though they ultimately settled on GM as their target. Given the incredible tough climate for both the CAW and the automakers, this could be a way for both of them to reach a compromise while mutually saving face. All three automakers are looking to reduce labor costs, while the CAW, at least publicly, is dead set against concessions on the part of the workers.

Speaking to the Windsor Star, Lewenza said that

“If I have it my way, I won’t have to announce a target company…If one of the companies will signal that we can get a deal, if we can get the framework of a deal in the next 10 days and I share that framework with the other companies, there won’t be a need for a target company,” he said.

Given Lewenza’s recent tone (which may be understandably firmer in the run-up to negotiations) this seems fairly pragmatic. And how about this nugget, also reports by the Star

If the companies “agree that workers are entitled to share in their success in a modest way, we can get a deal,” said Lewenza.

What does that mean? An open door for profit sharing…?

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 7 comments
  • Highdesertcat Highdesertcat on Aug 30, 2012

    If the workers want to share in their success, let them buy stock! Give them ESOPs or pay their bonuses with stock. Let's see how amenable they are to that.

  • Dimwit Dimwit on Aug 30, 2012

    The workers via the union already own a chunk of stock. Hell, they're on the board as well. Lewenza is trying to save face but the reality is that there is NO big 3 anymore. Each has become more different than alike. Even if one gave serious concessions the other two would go, "So?" You might as well deal with each simultaenously. Shortens the pain, anyway.

    • See 1 previous
    • Mikey Mikey on Aug 30, 2012

      @Dimwit...got to correct you on one point. The UAW owns GM shares via thier VEBA fund. The CAW, made no such deal. The Canadain and Ontario government hold around 9 percent, I think.

  • MaintenanceCosts Poorly packaged, oddly proportioned small CUV with an unrefined hybrid powertrain and a luxury-market price? Who wouldn't want it?
  • MaintenanceCosts Who knows whether it rides or handles acceptably or whether it chews up a set of tires in 5000 miles, but we definitely know it has a "mature stance."Sounds like JUST the kind of previous owner you'd want…
  • 28-Cars-Later Nissan will be very fortunate to not be in the Japanese equivalent of Chapter 11 reorganization over the next 36 months, "getting rolling" is a luxury (also, I see what you did there).
  • MaintenanceCosts RAM! RAM! RAM! ...... the child in the crosswalk that you can't see over the hood of this factory-lifted beast.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Yes all the Older Land Cruiser’s and samurai’s have gone up here as well. I’ve taken both vehicle ps on some pretty rough roads exploring old mine shafts etc. I bought mine right before I deployed back in 08 and got it for $4000 and also bought another that is non running for parts, got a complete engine, drive train. The mice love it unfortunately.
Next