By on April 9, 2012

Start cutting into the wrong car and you’re likely to get hate mail from brand purists. When Jesse James’ old Monster Garage show turned a fairly rare 1971 Chevy El Camino SS into a Figure 8 race car, the producers wouldn’t tell the seller what their plans were for fear of queering the deal. Now Figure 8, being a step above demo derby, is admittedly not exactly a concours, but Chevy cowboy Cadillacs are not quite as rare as hens’ teeth. There were 44,606 El Caminos produced in 1971. I remember something guitar dealer and trader George Gruhn said to me about $25,000 Fender Strats and $50,000 Gibson Les Pauls (paraphrased), “Remember, they were built in factories, on assembly lines, by Mexican American immigrant women, not by artisans like Cremona violins.” Actually, carrying Mr. Gruen’s remarks to their logical conclusion, it’s worth noting that Amati, Stradivari and Guarneri themselves had workshops with craftsmen and apprentices working for them. A ’58 Les Paul may not be a Stradivarius but then a Stradivarius isn’t nearly as rare as a Shelby Daytona Coupe. Stradivari made over a thousand instruments. Rarity is a relative term until you get to one of one. So when I read about Hamburg, Germany gallery owner and artist Thomas Eigel and engineer Jürgen Ulmer cutting up irreplaceable 1960s vintage Ferrari 330GT and 365GT bodies to create wall hangings they call the Ferrari Project I was ambivalent.

 

On one hand, it’s wrong to waste something. My zayde was a junkman who raised a family of five daughters and two nephews dealing in scrap paper and rags. On the other, I’m sure that while he occasionally brought home an unexpected find amidst the rags, it’s quite likely that in his day to day business he bundled up and sold what would now be collectible and possibly valuable items of ephemera, without giving it a second thought. Every day recyclers smelt objects that have value beyond that of scrap. So it goes.

“Ghost signs” are old advertisements painted on walls exposed when newer adjacent buildings are torn down, revealing the old ads once again. There’s one for Champion Spark Plugs on Woodward near Seven Mile in Detroit. Since being exposed it’s been gradually painted over by new ads. Part of me mourns the loss of some cool commercial art. The other part says that today’s ads generate wealth and the Champion ad was no less commercial than they are, though, to be honest, I liked its aesthetics better than a knockoff Sponge Bob Squarepants hawking party rentals. Ultimately, though, the owner of property has the right to do whatever they want to do with it, even cut it up for the sake of art.

The Hamburg artists say that aesthetics is one of their motivations. Another is paying homage to Ferrari and to Pininfarina who designed those bodies. They say that many collectible cars are works of art that are too often hidden away in warehouses and garages.

A classic Ferrari is more than a viable sports car. Seen from an aesthetic angle it is primarily an object of art. The constantly rising prices paid by collectors impressively confirm this – as do art exhibitions worldwide. It is almost certainly no coincidence, that the renowned New York Museum of Art chose a 1960s Ferrari as its first automotive exhibit.

Sadly these jewels are usually condemned to a life in dark and dusky garages instead of being admired in an inviting ambience.

Keeping with the focus on aesthetics and design, Eigel and Ulmer use only the body panels, leaving off any trim, lights, mirrors or wheels.

The results are unique objects of art, which fascinate particularly because the clear and simple shapes created by legendary Ferrari designer Pininfarina have been brought out beautifully.

So why destroy a perfectly serviceable (and very valuable) car body? Ulmer says,

“Only the original possesses the aura of Pininfarina’s design, to whom this is an homage.”

Perhaps there’s more than a touch of modern art’s fascination with the transgressive in the Ferrari Project but they do have a point. Mega car dealer, race team owner and noted car collector Rick Hendricks, when asked about resto-mods and “tribute” cars or clones of rare muscle cars getting serious money at auction, said that one reason is that the originals are just too valuable to drive and risk damage or destruction. Ken Lingenfelter has battery tenders on 99% of the cars in his collection just so that they can be driven regularly, but he admitted that a handful are so rare and essentially irreplaceable that they can’t practically be driven on public roads. A Ferrari in storage may appreciate in monetary value but hardly anyone gets to appreciate it.

To their credit, the artists didn’t cut up functioning cars. In both cases they tracked down bodies that had been removed from their production chassis and were just sitting collecting dust in storage, and recalling George Gruen’s remark, neither car is ultra-rare. About 1,000 Ferrari 365GTs were made and about 1,100 330GTs were produced. Ulmer and Eigel have announced that they will be taking commissions for future wallhangings of specific models. It remains to be seen whether they’ll recover other unused bodies, salvage panels from wrecks, or if they’ll transgressively take a Sawzall to a Ferrari that was running when parked (or, if they’ll work with other marques as their media). In any case, though, they are emulating Enzo Ferrari in the way they do business.

Interested persons, who would like to know the prices of these unusual wall decorations, will be invited to a chat face-to-face. “We handle this just like Enzo Ferrari, when a unique model was ordered”, says Jürgen Ulmer in recognition of the great creator of the artwork’s basis: “The Commendatore used to utter these things over a glass of good red wine.”

Speaking of prices, Ars may be Gratia Artis but something tells me that each Ferrari Project wall hanging will be priced significantly higher than 50% of the market value of each of those complete Ferrari bodies. 

 

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, a realistic perspective on cars & car culture and the original 3D car site. If you found this post worthwhile, you can dig deeper at Cars In Depth. If the 3D thing freaks you out, don’t worry, all the photo and video players in use at the site have mono options. Thanks – RJS

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

15 Comments on “What’s Wrong With This Picture? Ferraris For Art’s Sake Edition...”


  • avatar
    LeMansteve

    Which is worse: purchasing a Ferrari as an investment that never leaves its climate controlled garage, or cutting one up to hang on the wall and appreciate its beauty?

    • 0 avatar

      Sadly, once they’ve transcended “machinery” and move into “art”, they really cease to be what they were originally intended to be. I frankly can’t mourn the loss of a 4-light Ferrari anyway; the side profile is quite good, but these things were just ugly at the front end.

  • avatar

    It has been popular at various times over the years to take the old 4-seat V12 cars (which, at various times, haven’t been worth much) and rebody them as more desirable 2-seat variants (Spider Californias, SWB Berlinettas, etc). The prices for 250GTEs and 330GT 2+2s have risen to the point where nobody is really doing this anymore, but there are still a bunch of discarded 4-seat Ferrari body shells sitting out in the rain behind shops around the world. I don’t really see anything wrong with making art out of them; it’s not like the cars themselves were sacrificed for this.

    • 0 avatar
      Ryoku75

      There wouldn’t be anything wrong with it, but the issue in this case is that they’re not being turbed into art, they’re just being cut and hung up on a wall.

  • avatar
    VanillaDude

    Sorry – it doesn’t work as art.
    It fails to present to us an original interpretation of the object. In this case, the artist has reduced the remarkable wholeness of the original car, into a bland car part which completely fails to capture the original’s beauty. Unless you were familiar with the entire car, you cannot completely understand the artist’s statement. There is a reason the artist put the famous Ferrari marque on the fender. Without it, the art piece would appear even less interesting.

    The installed piece is even less attractive than the idea behind it. It is lit from behind by a light that does nothing but distract. If the piece was lit from behind by a garage trouble light commonly found in garages, that would at least make some kind of cohesive auto statement.

    The car should have been cut up so that it’s corners could have been left intact, then mounted so that the fender would jut from a wall. By doing this, the piece would have presented the car as what it was – a 3D object with mass, volume and presense. Even stripping the front corner of the car of it’s chrome or glass would have been better.

    What we have here is a lifeless flat piece of auto art, poorly lit and hanging like it came right off an assembly line. Not good.

    • 0 avatar

      Still, I bet there’s a market for similar Mustang and Camaro wall hangings. You wouldn’t even have to cut up a car since Dynacorn has all the panels you’d need. One of these days I’m going to buy a Mini front end from the British Motor Heritage folks http://www.bmh-ltd.com/bodyshells2.htm and make a living room chair out of it.

      Also, I was struck by the irony that the artists say they want the bodies to be on display and enjoyed but the reality is that if anyone buys them, they’ll go into a private collection where few will see them.

      • 0 avatar
        Ryoku75

        A Camaro or Mustang grille would make a nice wall hanging, but not the side of one.

        That 2nd point is true, though you’d have a to be fool to call a section of a car “art.

    • 0 avatar
      Ryoku75

      What we’re left with is a section of an awful taxidermy.

  • avatar
    Felis Concolor

    It’s art? There’s a price tag on it? That would make it Ars Gratia Pecuniae.

  • avatar
    icemilkcoffee

    Art? That particular model is probaly the ugliest Ferrari ever made. It’s more wall cachet than wall art.

  • avatar
    Ryoku75

    As an artist I’m quite familiar with stuff like this, its “Modern Art” where some one will basically take something, hang it up, and call it “art”.

    I like to call it “A way of making art without using any talent whatsoever”, as Modern Art has become popular to both hipsters (idiots that love things only because they’re different) and who I call “Bums”, people that want things to be exteremely easy and expect other people to have no standards.

    This isn’t art, its just something thats stuck on a wall.

  • avatar
    Ryoku75

    Does anyone have anymore info on the Camino Monster garage stuff? I’d like to read about it, and maybe why they specifically chose an SS.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • bd2: Ironically, NAFTA decimated the small farmer in Mexico (subsidized American big agri) – which often meant...
  • bd2: The plant that builds those pickups in Mexico opened in 1994. Ford built Lincolns in Mexico and now the Mustang...
  • C5 is Alive: Except that the ES250 was introduced two model years after the last Cimarron infested Cadillac...
  • Jeff S: @jmo2–Much easier to work on a 70s car than a present day car because there were no computers. As for...
  • Jeff S: @Corey–Thank you looking forward to your piece on the Imperial.

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber